While there still are all sorts of problems with UK libel law, a recent ruling in the UK's High Court tossed out a lawsuit because the potential damages were way too small to merit a trial. Specifically, someone charged a blogger with defamation for a blog post, but most of the content in that blog post was actually based on an article on the plaintiff's own website. From that, the court found that any "additional" damage beyond what was already known from the plaintiff's own article was so minimal that it wouldn't even be worth the cost of a trial.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Legal Challenges To Spying Mount In UK
- UK Police Target Advertising On Infringing Sites, Opens Door For Scammers And Malware Purveyors
- UK Court Rules That Software Functionality Is Not Subject To Copyright
- UK Parliament Makes A Mockery Of Itself Interrogating Guardian Editor
- NSA Worked Out Deal With GCHQ To Spy On UK Citizens, Secretly Expanded It