There's Some Echo On This Skype Call... Or Is It Just Doublespeak?

from the what-we-have-here-is-a-failure-to-communicate dept

Skype has been one of the louder voices in pushing for broadband providers to be forced to keep their networks open. One of the company's execs has taken to its blog supporting net neutrality regulations in the EU, making some useful points about how it's services like Skype that sell broadband subscriptions and, specifically, mobile data plans. But how does that reconcile with Skype's mobile moves in the US, where it appears to be pushing exclusive deals with operators over "open" access? So, on the one hand, Skype doesn't want to have to pay telcos for access to its customers. But then on the other, it looks like Skype wants to charge telcos to be able to offer its service to their customers. This makes it look like Skype is okay with pay-to-play systems, but only when it's on the receiving end. Certainly Skype is free to use whatever business model it likes, but it certainly appears it's trying to have the best of both worlds here.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 22nd, 2010 @ 8:36pm

    carlo skype wants net neutrality because they need the p2p aspects to make their network go. otherwise they are out of business. they leech bandwidth to make their business viable.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 22nd, 2010 @ 8:38pm

    Carlo,

    Get some facts straight..,
    Qwest has the largest internet fiber backbone in the United States, and the 2nd largest internet backbone in the World. Provides fiber connections to 95% of all the Fortune 500 companies. And is one of only 3 backbone service providers for the U.S. Government. It's not the small fry company you make it out to be.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 22nd, 2010 @ 8:41pm

    Re:

    Delete this comment, wrong post

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 22nd, 2010 @ 10:07pm

    echoback

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 22nd, 2010 @ 10:10pm

    Re:

    well I can't find any sources right now, but the technical term when you say something in a phone and you hear your echo back is called echo back or echoback (I forget if it's one word or two).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    icon
    mjb5406 (profile), Apr 23rd, 2010 @ 1:26am

    You Nailed It, Mike

    When I started reading your post, the first thing that popped into my mind was Skype's exclusive deal with Verizon, basically cutting off every other mobile carriers' customers from Skype Mobile. What I find even more disingenuous is, when you look at the Skype Mobile site, they actually have a sign-up where they will alert you when your current cell contract is up so you can switch to Verizon Wireless! That takes a lot of balls... and I think it'll just be a matter of time before Skype blocks alternative mobile programs, like Fring and iSkoot, from accessing its network. Great "neutrality"... neutral only if you have Verizon... anyone else, they tell you to get screwed.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 23rd, 2010 @ 4:49am

    Re:

    How can they leech bandwidth if their customers are the ones paying for it? It's not like they keep half the packets each customer sends in a vault somewhere.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    abc gum, Apr 23rd, 2010 @ 4:51am

    Re:

    Please explain, exactly, how p2p "leeches" bw.
    Extra credit for a real life example.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    not "the AC", Apr 23rd, 2010 @ 4:54am

    Re: Re: Look at ME I'm Perfect

    No, let's leave it here as a monument to "the AC".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 23rd, 2010 @ 5:06am

    Re: Re:

    skype will often use your computer to pass traffic for others. you could not make a single skype call and use plenty of bandwidth supporting the skype product anyway. you are basically reselling bandwidth to them which is against your customer agreement when you get residential service from an isp.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 23rd, 2010 @ 5:07am

    Re: Re: Re: Look at ME I'm Perfect

    except it was the ac just an ac.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 23rd, 2010 @ 5:45am

    Re: Re: Re:

    Wait is this true? TAM, did you make an argument based on logic? Is this actually how skype works? Of course, screw the customer agreement with a rake, but if they do use your badnwidth for calls other than your own, how much consent/information on that is there? I'm guessing there is a clause in their TOS saying "by using Skype(TM)(R)(LMFAO) you agree to blah blah blah..." Again, who cares about the BS agreement? The main thing here is that if true, in exchange for using their service, they require access to an undisclosed amount of your decidedly non-infinite badwidth. That's kinda wonky.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 23rd, 2010 @ 5:49am

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Well, *bandwidth, but I guess depending on your provider, "Badwidth" would be appropriate too...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 23rd, 2010 @ 5:50am

    Re: Re:

    There is also cross-talk, where you hear someone else's conversation.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 23rd, 2010 @ 9:26am

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    it doesnt matter you cannot consent to resell your bandwidth on a residential internet installation.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 23rd, 2010 @ 10:17am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Damnit TAM, why'd you have to go and screw it up? Nobody should care if some words on paper don't match up quite right. The issue here is that Skype is doing something kind of shady by using you for their traffic. The terms on the agreement can be changed to fit whatever. A business that acts against their customers' interest (Skype) is what was interesting about this. You had me agreeing with you on this one point, and now you come back in and say "lol u broke teh law get to the back to the bus 'the parks'".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 23rd, 2010 @ 10:25am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    it is the doubly whammy. skype makes you agree to something you cant agree with, buries the idea deep in their terms, and then effectively resells you bandwidth to other people who may pay for service. you cant resell your bandwidth, but skype has suckered a bunch of people into doing it really without them knowing. http://chris.pirillo.com/are-you-a-skype-supernode/ the default setting is on and active.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 23rd, 2010 @ 10:32am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    "skype makes you agree to something you cant agree with"

    Aaaannnd...I'm back on board on this issue. Even if I think that the ToS itself is bogus, Skype should not make me break it as a compuslory prerequisite of using their service. Because even if I don't care if I break my ISP's ToS, my ISP sure as hell will.

    That option should be opt-in; especially when ISPs have caps and serious upstream limits.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 23rd, 2010 @ 10:53am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    hence at the end of this all of course skype is for net neutrality because they dont want isps to take action to kill off their source of free unlimited bandwidth. without it skype would like disappear in minutes.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    icon
    Derek Kerton (profile), Apr 23rd, 2010 @ 2:54pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    "Is this actually how skype works? Of course, screw the customer agreement with a rake, but if they do use your badnwidth for calls other than your own"

    They don't carry calls through your connection. What they do is manage the routing using what are called "supernodes". Supernodes are often people running skype on a decent computer, with a good connection, and steady uptime. Anyone can become a supernode, and thus have call handling/management and connection data passed through them. This is P2P.

    The actual call is connected directly...um...P2P, but Skype uses the supernodes to help the caller find the callee.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    icon
    Derek Kerton (profile), Apr 23rd, 2010 @ 3:02pm

    Re: Re:

    See my explanation, above. I didn't use the word "leech", but Skype does potentially use a fair bit of bandwidth even if you are not currently making a call or chat.

    One night, I was working on my desktop, and noticed my laptop's cooling fan kept ramping up very high. This happens automatically when the processor is being used. I checked what process was burning cycles on my Centrino. It was Skype. I checked network use, and sure enough Skype was using my PC as a supernode. I consider this a cost of using Skype, so am not peeved. I don't see it as evil. This is how P2P works...you have to pitch in to the network for the network to exist. You can call it "leeching", but it's not a secret. Any geek worth his salt would know that P2P doesn't have central servers to manage traffic, so the work is pushed out to the edge.

    However, since I wasn't using it, I did exit Skype on the laptop, which ended the supernode.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    icon
    Derek Kerton (profile), Apr 23rd, 2010 @ 3:05pm

    Re: You Nailed It, Mike

    Cool. But Carlo wrote this post, and I wrote the prior one it links to.

    Who is this Mike?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This