Murdoch Gets His Feet Wet In Bringing Hot News Lawsuit Against Briefing.com

from the and-here-we-go dept

Well, you had to know this was going to happen. In the last year, there had been an awful lot of talk about a previously considered obsolete concept of "hot news" -- which created a copyright-like protection for factual information, without any statutory basis. It's a very troubling concept that shouldn't have any real basis in the law, but does exist due to a nearly century old Supreme Court case. Lots of news publishers have started making noises about "hot news," and in March we had the first ruling that blocked a publication from reposting factual information under a "hot news" claim. Once that ruling was made, you had to know that more lawsuits would follow pretty quickly.

And off we go. What's interesting here is that it appears that it's Rupert Murdoch testing the waters this time. Murdoch, of course, has been making odd claims about Google "stealing" content, while also suggesting that fair use doesn't exist. But rather than take on Google in court, it looks like Murdoch is targeting easier prey. Murdoch-owned Dow Jones is suing Briefing.com for copyright infringement and hot news appropriation. You can read the full complaint below:
Basically, the complaint is similar to TheFlyOnTheWall complaint from last month that successfully claimed "hot news." Dow Jones claims it puts out info over its wire service, and minutes later Briefing.com seems to put out similar news, often using the same headline. Of course for the most part, headlines are not copyrightable, but are they covered by hot news? We may find out soon enough. The whole thing is silly of course. If Dow Jones can't compete against some company copying its headlines and summarizing its stories, it must not be adding very much value. Suing over this is basically an admission of that very fact.

Either way, my guess is that this particular lawsuit has little to do with Briefing.com -- or even Dow Jones and its newswires. This is Murdoch testing the waters on hot news. Of course, he may come to seriously regret doing so, given how many of his own sites probably violate the same hot news concept.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 21st, 2010 @ 2:44pm

    More reason why we need a system that somehow holds judges accountable to the people. We don't need judges creating bad laws, Congress already does a good enough job at that.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 21st, 2010 @ 2:46pm

    probably violate? is that the best you can do? after a week off i figured the masnick would come back with a material, but this is cut rate. the case appears strong enough to prosecute and with one good judgement already there it is easy to follow up. i would think you would shy away from this one considering how the courts are ruling.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 21st, 2010 @ 2:52pm

    Re:

    So it's not good for people to criticize a court ruling TAM? Courts are perfect and never make bad decisions unless their rulings disagree with you?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 21st, 2010 @ 3:01pm

    Re: Re:

    no but the court ruling is pretty clear, and this case appears to be a slam dunk based on that ruling. i would figure the masnick would use some other example that is more questionable. i guess its just his hatred of murdoch coming out.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Quick Brown Fox, Apr 21st, 2010 @ 3:16pm

    Why are there so many Anonymous Cowards in the room? Is creative thinking in such short supply that more distinctive pseudonyms are not possible?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Bill Enator, Apr 21st, 2010 @ 3:23pm

    DOW scrapes headlines and content from others.

    Stupid Stupid Stupid lawsuit

    I'd like to point out that DOW JONES does this ALL THE TIME.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    David, Apr 21st, 2010 @ 3:29pm

    The examples of verbatim copying in the complaint are pretty damning - Dow will probably win this on that basis alone, regardless of the hot news charge.

    I wonder if Briefing had waited an hour to post the headlines, does it still count as hot news?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    icon
    Modplan (profile), Apr 21st, 2010 @ 3:44pm

    Stay classy Dow

    2. There are other entities, including the defendant in this action, which instead base their business model substantially on the early and systemic taking of proprietary content published by media organizations like Dow Jones. Whiles those companies might derive some content from their own legitimate news-gathering operations, they also unfairly ride for free on the backs of others. By instantaneously cutting and pasting into their own products the reports of news events uncovered and verified by other news outlets at significant investment and expense, they offer a pirated product at cheaper cost.

    3. To combat this unauthorized free-riding, and to preserve the strength and viability of its intellectual property and newsgathering efforts, Dow Jones is seeking relief through copyright, contract and hot news misappropriation claims. The misappropriation of news and other content not only devalues news products, it also threatens the very economic structure upon which journalistic enterprises such as Dow Jones are built and on which its customers depend.

    TAM?

    So many things wrong with this opening statement alone. No one told them the interwebs is an inherently free rider tolerant system.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Beta, Apr 21st, 2010 @ 3:51pm

    asymmetry

    "[Murdoch] may come to seriously regret [this], given how many of his own sites probably violate the same hot news concept."

    There's a biiiig difference between a case that Rupert Murdoch can win, and a case that you could win against Rupert Murdoch.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 21st, 2010 @ 4:13pm

    Re:

    how dare you call me a pesdomame?!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 21st, 2010 @ 4:26pm

    Re:

    everyone should be. it would be better because poeple would maybe debate ideas instead of personalities.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 21st, 2010 @ 4:51pm

    Re: Stay classy Dow

    nothing wrong with the first statement. only techdirties will disagree because they are all about free-riding and getting something for nothing.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    icon
    Modplan (profile), Apr 21st, 2010 @ 5:13pm

    Re: Re: Stay classy Dow

    When something costs nothing, it's difficult to consider people who get it for nothing free riding. More like the people who want to make cost more than nothing are free riding.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    sick of the ac troll, Apr 21st, 2010 @ 5:16pm

    Re:

    "i figured the masnick would come back with a material"

    A material what? Is that the best the AC can do?

    Did you not learn anything in elemantary school about capitalization?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 21st, 2010 @ 5:18pm

    Re: Re:

    EXACTLY! I'VE BEEN SAYING THAT FOR YEARS NOW! ENOUGH WITH THE PERSONALITY, PEOPLE.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 21st, 2010 @ 5:20pm

    This is just horrible!

    My toilet is clogged.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 21st, 2010 @ 5:24pm

    Well.........................

    ......does ANYONE have a plunger!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    identicon
    Capt. Obvious, Apr 21st, 2010 @ 5:25pm

    Re: Re: Stay classy Dow

    There's no such thing as a free ride.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    identicon
    Ha!, Apr 21st, 2010 @ 5:26pm

    Re: This is just horrible!

    That's hot news

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 21st, 2010 @ 6:21pm

    Re: Re:

    Yeah, TAM never debates personalities, except when he does.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 21st, 2010 @ 6:35pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    What? Use another example for what? and who are you to determine the purpose of his examples.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 21st, 2010 @ 7:11pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    What?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 21st, 2010 @ 7:12pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    You talking to me?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24.  
    identicon
    Richard, Apr 21st, 2010 @ 7:36pm

    Whats going on with this blog?

    The last few weeks I've noticed antagonist posts that are clearly designed to flood the thread with adolescent scribble. I could have just said trolling, but this is bigger. I'm starting to suspect that these posts are malicious in their intent, as are the posters. The overall quality of discussion has gone south. This thread is a great example of that. This is an important story. I cant think of many things more important than the first amendment being blatantly violated. Yet the first half is a silly flame war and again about someones toilet.

    Maybe it's just me but I see a consorted effort to diminish the credibility of this blog, by making it's community look like fools.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  25.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 21st, 2010 @ 8:42pm

    Re: Whats going on with this blog?

    If it is actually a focused effort to ruin a community, it really says a lot about industry shills...and how out of touch they are.

    People on the internet have been routing around user inputted garbage for over a decade. A little more won't change very much.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  26.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 21st, 2010 @ 9:13pm

    Re: Whats going on with this blog?

    actually, what you are seeing is reverse shills attempting to drown out people who dont agree with the masnick, and in turn they are ruining things for everyone. instead of addressing issues, they attack and flood out comments from their foes. i actually think it is either mike or members of his staff that have provoked it as they are too quick on the responses like they have live monitoring or something.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  27.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 21st, 2010 @ 9:14pm

    Re: Re: Re: Stay classy Dow

    i will allow the masnick to explain the apparent differences between cost and value.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  28.  
    icon
    techflaws.org (profile), Apr 22nd, 2010 @ 1:40am

    ignore the bs

    i actually think it is either mike or members of his staff that have provoked it as they are too quick on the responses like they have live monitoring or something.

    And who gives a damn about what TAM thinks?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  29.  
    identicon
    abc gum, Apr 22nd, 2010 @ 5:45am

    Re: Re: Whats going on with this blog?

    "reverse shills "

    That's too funny!
    I knew you were full of it, but that is amazing.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  30.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 22nd, 2010 @ 6:29am

    Re: Re: Re: Whats going on with this blog?

    ahh you got a name instead of anonymous. what an improvement.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  31.  
    identicon
    Michael, Apr 22nd, 2010 @ 7:41am

    Re: asymmetry

    True, but he has a lot of news organizations and if 10% of them are dealing with even bogus claims about them stealing headlines, he is going to take a pretty big hit to his bottom line.

    The "hot news" doctrine is a lot different now than it was when it was created. We no longer have just three news organizations reporting news. If one blogger gets out a news story that happens to have the same headline as a New York Times news story the next day, he could be on the losing end of a lawsuit.

    With patent trolling becoming a big deal, it seems like it may be profitable to create a website that generates headlines about every major political figure and celebrity every day and then just file suits against news organizations that happen to have a similar headline the next day.

    Wait - I think I just cam up with a new business idea...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  32.  
    identicon
    Anonymous, Apr 22nd, 2010 @ 8:09am

    When you write the following: "If Dow Jones can't compete against some company copying its headlines and summarizing its stories, it must not be adding very much value. Suing over this is basically an admission of that very fact."

    I just have to ask: Am I to believe that you wouldn't object if an unauthorized person were selling your posts verbatim and cutting into your traffic?

    I'll go ahead and say that you or your employer would object.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  33.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 22nd, 2010 @ 8:21am

    Re: Whats going on with this blog?

    I agree!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  34.  
    icon
    slander (profile), Apr 22nd, 2010 @ 8:39am

    Re: Re: Re: Stay classy Dow

    That's not what they say about my ex-wife...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  35.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 22nd, 2010 @ 9:54am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Whats going on with this blog?

    YOU ARE SO DUMB!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This