U.S. Leaders Should Heed Their Own Advice On Internet Filters

from the glass-houses dept

It has been kind of entertaining (some would say frightening) watching the Australian government's futile efforts to clean the Internet of its naughty bits. As part of their filtering plans, the government conducted trials with a handful of ISPs, many of whom have been very vocal in their beliefs that the filters won't technically work. These ongoing trials had no quantifiable metric to determine whether the trials were a success or failure, so obviously, Australian Communications Minister Stephen Conroy proudly announced that the trials proved the filters to be 100% effective. Political leaders in favor of the filters haven't exactly been open to feedback on the dangers of filters, and the country learned nothing early on, when a teenage kid hacked their original filter system in all of half an hour.

Recently, U.S. politicians have been ramping up their criticism of Australia's filtering efforts, with the State Department last month issuing a rather vague statement indicating "we have raised our concerns on this matter." This week, the U.S. Ambassador to Australia Jeff Bleich was willing to get a little more specific in a low-quality poetry sort of way, insisting that the Internet "needs to be free" in much the same way "the polar caps have to be free" (whatever that means). Bleich went out of his way to state that there are other methods to deal with extremism and child pornography, like addressing them at the source:

"We have been able to accomplish the goals that Australia has described, which is to capture and prosecute child pornographers and others who use the Internet for terrible purposes, without having to use Internet filters. We have other means and we are willing to share our efforts with them in order to allow them to at least look at a range of choices, as opposed to moving in one particular direction. It's an ongoing conversation."

While Bleich insists it's a conversation, all indications are Australia's government isn't listening. They've already spent a fortune on the idea, and have ignored critics every single step of the way. As is usually the case when talk of imposing filters fires up, the specter of child pornography and other societal menaces are used as the scary red herring. Given how susceptible U.S. citizens are to sales pitches involving "protecting the children," it seems like only a matter of time (and lobbyist effort) before the United States requires ISPs to impose copyright filters at the behest of the entertainment industry and Bono. We've already had a few close calls, like with the ACTA or with U.S. lawmakers trying to bury filtering plans into the broadband stimulus effort -- so it sounds like Uncle Sam should heed his own advice.



Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 15th, 2010 @ 10:46am

    sort of a very long lead from child pornography to copyright filters. is the masnick engaging in his own version of scare mongering?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    Karl Bode (profile), Apr 15th, 2010 @ 10:53am

    sort of a very long lead from child pornography to copyright filters. is the masnick engaging in his own version of scare mongering?
    I'm confused. Child porn and extremism have repeatedly been used as justifications by those looking to push copyright filters around the globe. There is scare mongering afoot, but it's not "the masnick" doing it (who didn't write this post anyway).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    icon
    Chronno S. Trigger (profile), Apr 15th, 2010 @ 10:55am

    Re:

    Not long at all. They've already pushed for filters to prevent copyright violations with the guise of fighting child pornography.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 15th, 2010 @ 10:57am

    Re:

    Copyright infringement supports terrorism and the raping of innocent woodland creatures. I really don't understand why they just don't shut off the internet. Why would anyone use a tool that potentially supports terrorism and the raping of innocent woodland creatures? It's just rude.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 15th, 2010 @ 11:50am

    Re:

    the scare mongering is in the other direction. if they do anything about child porn, the *aa people will get them to block everything else too! the sky is falling! everything is some sort of slippery slope. that is scare mongering at its finest.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 15th, 2010 @ 12:02pm

    Re: Re:

    http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/04/entertainment-industrys-dystopia-future

    "The planned release of a blockbuster motion picture should be acknowledged as an event that attracts the focused efforts of copyright thieves, who will seek to obtain and distribute pre-release versions and/or to undermine legitimate release by unauthorized distribution through other channels. Enforcement agencies (notably within DOJ and DHS) should plan a similarly focused preventive and responsive strategy. An interagency task force should work with industry to coordinate and make advance plans to try to interdict these most damaging forms of copyright theft, and to react swiftly with enforcement actions where necessary."

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 15th, 2010 @ 12:10pm

    Re:

    Didn't you hear, Karl?

    Everyone who points out TAM's stupidity is actually Mike. In disguise. Secretively. As part of a massive conspiracy.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    icon
    Steve R. (profile), Apr 15th, 2010 @ 12:13pm

    Filtering and Third Party Liability

    An important aspect concerning filtering is third party liability which you discuss a few posts down. We already see too many companies declining to produce products or services because of the bogeyman word "liability".

    Beyond the liability issue there is that of the police state. Are we going to end up being a nation were people are mandated by law to spy on their neighbors and turn them in for "infringing" on some obscure special interest group?

    How Third Party Liability Can Stifle An Industry

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 15th, 2010 @ 12:17pm

    Re: Re:

    hi mike

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 15th, 2010 @ 1:05pm

    Re:

    if I could give you a "thumbs up" on the site I would

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    icon
    The Groove Tiger (profile), Apr 15th, 2010 @ 3:07pm

    Re:

    is the masnick engaging in scaremonging? this makes the hulk angry! the todd calls for a high five! some people just call him: the stig!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Big Al, Apr 15th, 2010 @ 3:34pm

    Re:

    AC, you should actually look at what the Australian filter proposal covers. It isn't just about child porn (although that's how it's being 'marketed' to the unwashed masses) but also about anything that the censors (i.e. the government) don't like.
    That could conceivably extend to the criticism of the incumbents or, in fact, anything a lobbyist with enough cash doesn't like, such as The Pirate Bay. All with no public oversight.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 15th, 2010 @ 5:41pm

    Re: Filtering and Third Party Liability

    third party liability is important. it stops companies from offering safe havens for those people who want to break the law.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 15th, 2010 @ 5:54pm

    Re: Re: Filtering and Third Party Liability

    Yeah, darn those evil criminal safe havens called phone lines.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    abc gum, Apr 15th, 2010 @ 6:13pm

    Re: Re:

    Dont expect anything resembling an intelligent comment from that particular AC.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 15th, 2010 @ 6:16pm

    Re: Re: Filtering and Third Party Liability

    Nice shirt ... is that a shade of brown?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    Glenn, Apr 16th, 2010 @ 2:11am

    Logic...

    It's going to rain, therefore I should paint the living room blue.

    (What? ...you wanted it to make sense?)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 16th, 2010 @ 7:41am

    Re: Re:

    "everything is some sort of slippery slope" ... that's rich, coming from the guy who said that because some kids download songs a WHOLE GENERATION is growing up with no repect for ANYONE'S property.

    See, your problem is you have been here too long, talking drivel. Such is your inability to adopt a singular and consistent viewpoint abut anything that there is now no need to negate your posts with logic since there is a large history of your own statements that can be drawn upon to contradict anything you say either now or in the future. You, sir, have reached an unsustainable level of contradiction that will cause yourself to compress into a black hole of BS from which logic and reason cannot escape. Congratulations TAM Wormtonge!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This