The Same Day The NY Times Praised Google For Standing Up To China, The Times Paid Singapore's Leaders
from the parallels dept
Two big stories recently were Google's decision to effectively leave China and the NY Times' agreement to pay Singapore's leaders for daring to refer to the fact that a father and son pair had both been prime minister as a "dynasty." The Times' public editor is now comparing the two situations -- and while he notes that Singapore is an important market for many media publications, and from a business perspective, the decision makes sense, he seems to suggest that Google got this right, while the Times got it wrong:
Google faced a similar painful dilemma in China. With potentially billions of dollars at risk, it stuck to its principles, and The Times applauded editorially. I think Google set an example for everyone who believes in the free flow of information.






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Oh the irony! A 'free flow of information' from the NYT can be yours for $17.99 a month...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I mean, yes, stand up to censorship, but do it from the start, not when it suits your childish need for revenge.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
They had to be around long enough to influence the people who live there. More importantly, the up and coming generation of "makers"
Then they made a huge point over what's wrong in China.
Then they punctuated the sentence with an exclamation point, and walked.
It's now up to those people who they influenced to change their own country.
I think this is all going according to a very brilliant plan. In fact, I know it is.
The "attacks" are just a convenient excuse to execute the next part of the plan.
(I mean, Chinese hackers have been attacking US sites since got their first IP address. Get real.)
Idealism is good and necessary. But idealism should only inform realism, not replace it. We need China to change. For real.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Heh. In your rush to slam me, perhaps you missed that this was the NY Times slamming the NY Times.
Details: not your strong suit.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Oh please, praise Google?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment