MGMT Album Leaks... Band Wants To Give Official Version For Free, But Denied

from the so-much-for-that dept

It's pretty common these days for musical releases from big name bands to leak early, followed by the band pushing up the release date. In the latest such case (sent in by reader Matthew), the band MGMT had its latest album leaked early, and then responded by putting up a free streaming version of the entire album. They're not the first band to do this, but what's interesting is the note on the band's website, where they claim they wanted to actually make the whole thing downloadable, but were told that wasn't allowed:
Hey everybody, the album leaked, and we wanted you to be able to hear it from us. We wanted to offer it as a free download but that didn't make sense to anyone but us
Well, actually, it makes sense to lots of us, but we're not running Sony Music. It's great that the band was able to put out a streaming version, and doesn't seem to mind that the album itself leaked, but not putting up an official downloadable version means that people will still be getting the unofficial version, and MGMT and Sony miss out on an opportunity to actually connect with the fans (such as by asking for an email address or giving people additional reasons to buy as they download).


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 23rd, 2010 @ 4:30pm

    of course it makes sense to you, you didnt pay to make the album. start putting 100,000 or more on the table and then ask if you want to just give it away. its easy to say give it away when you arent paying for it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    AC #3, Mar 23rd, 2010 @ 4:41pm

    harm? I see no harm.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Drewshannon (profile), Mar 23rd, 2010 @ 4:43pm

    Mike,
    I love all your pieces, and generally agree with you, but not here. Sony most likely paid for the recording, production, and marketing for the album. Why on earth would they give it away for free? I'm all for bands giving away their music (I think the days of recorded music being the final product are numbered), especially independent artists as a way to boost ticket sales, merch, premium physical products, etc., but in this situation, it makes absolutely no sense.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 23rd, 2010 @ 4:48pm

      Re:

      My view is that anyone who wants to can already download it. It can only help build goodwill and fan loyalty (and allow them to choose what marketing gets displayed next to the download link) if they offer an official free download.

      They can always put up a "pay what you think it's worth" button for people who want to contribute back and a pre-order link for people who want the album art.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Drewshannon (profile), Mar 23rd, 2010 @ 4:53pm

        Re: Re:

        I don't think bands are crazy in thinking / hoping that people will pay for their music, and I think Sony and the band should put the album up FOR SALE now. If I can throw $7 towards the band today to legally download the album, I'd happily do it.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Mar 24th, 2010 @ 6:03pm

        Re: Re: Pay whwat you want!

        FIXED:
        They can always BEG FOR CHARITY from for people who want to contribute back...


        You're welcome.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Mike Masnick (profile), Mar 23rd, 2010 @ 4:55pm

      Re:

      I love all your pieces, and generally agree with you, but not here. Sony most likely paid for the recording, production, and marketing for the album. Why on earth would they give it away for free?

      Because it already is free. So why not try to take advantage of that to actually make some money by embracing it and feeding it into a real business model?

      I'm all for bands giving away their music (I think the days of recorded music being the final product are numbered), especially independent artists as a way to boost ticket sales, merch, premium physical products, etc., but in this situation, it makes absolutely no sense.

      Why not?!? The music is already free. Not embracing it means people go elsewhere. Embracing it means a chance to earn money.

      Why would Sony purposely drive fans to download elsewhere?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Drewshannon (profile), Mar 23rd, 2010 @ 5:02pm

        Re: Re:

        "Because it already is free. So why not try to take advantage of that to actually make some money by embracing it and feeding it into a real business model?"

        But by this logic, why should bands bother trying to sell their music at all? I think you could make that argument for any album out there today.

        If I were the band / label, I would put up a cheap digital download today (or pay-what-you-want). Give the fans a simple, easy, quick way to pay for the music (digitally, or up-sell for a premium package), and I think you'd be surprised at how many pitch in.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Mar 23rd, 2010 @ 6:07pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          Umm...why? Maybe you should ask...umm...you.

          "I think the days of recorded music being the final product are numbered."

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            Drewshannon (profile), Mar 23rd, 2010 @ 9:52pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            Yes, in general, I think those days are numbered. However, the major labels will continue to base their business models, wrong or right, on selling music, until their dying breath.

            If MGMT were an independent or unsigned band, I would tell them to put it up for free download in a heartbeat. As other people have mentioned, it could be a good idea have the fans submit an email address for the album (or half the album), and build the email list. Then you can reach out to them later and upsell to a higher price point or tell them about tour dates.

            HOWEVER, I don't think Sony would never and will never do that as long as they are a major record company. As far as I know, MGMT doesn't have a 360 deal with Sony, and thus, Sony is making no money off of the band's ticket sales and merch sales, only recorded music. Until that changes, they will want to sell as much music as possible.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              icon
              PaulT (profile), Mar 24th, 2010 @ 2:30am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              "HOWEVER, I don't think Sony would never and will never do that as long as they are a major record company."

              That's their decision. They're wrong, and will pay the consequences in the long term, but it's their right to do so.

              "As far as I know, MGMT doesn't have a 360 deal with Sony, and thus, Sony is making no money off of the band's ticket sales and merch sales, only recorded music."

              Again, that's their problem. If they signed a deal with the band that only gives them access to a small and shrinking section of the potential market, and they inevitably lose money because of it, they deserve to pay the consequences for following a business model that's going the way of the dinosaur. They've had over a decade since Napster to build a business model for the 21st century, and haven't bothered to do so.

              "Until that changes, they will want to sell as much music as possible."

              Indeed. But what they *want* to happen and what will actually happen may well be two completely different things.

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              •  
                identicon
                Solohan50, Mar 24th, 2010 @ 8:05am

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                I can't believe I'm going to side with Sony in this comment, but it sounds like Sony is making the only decision that they can make with their current arrangement with MGMT. This isn't to say that Sony's reliance on CD sales is a smart thing, but at this point in time it's the reality of their situation.

                If Sony does not have a 360 deal with MGMT then they will only make money on album sales. If that's the case, then even if releasing the album for free did boost sales of other scarce goods that MGMT has to offer, Sony doesn't see any money from that. Sony has stuck themselves with one good to sell, which is albums. While betting everything on CD sales is not a smart business decision, it's what they're stuck with with MGMT, so they have to make the decision based on what makes sense with their current situation.

                 

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Drewshannon (profile), Mar 23rd, 2010 @ 5:07pm

        Re: Re:

        I totally agree that they need to figure out some way to let fans download the album, today, from them. I'm just not sure that free is the right answer.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Mar 23rd, 2010 @ 6:10pm

        Re: Re:

        Why would Sony purposely drive fans to download elsewhere?

        Because then they can find those pirates and sue them into poverty. Its taken a while to get started and there were some bumps along the way but this suing fans thing is starting to pan out. Best to stick to the old model.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    sehlat (profile), Mar 23rd, 2010 @ 4:44pm

    Since it's Sony...

    why should I care? I haven't bought *anything* Sony since they tried to rootkit my machine with Neil Diamond's album.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    David T, Mar 23rd, 2010 @ 4:47pm

    It's just sillyness

    These kind of restrictions are put in place be people who are still clueless about how consumers consume their product.

    It's like the stupid restrictions on skipping songs in Pandora when you can just hop to Youtube and listen to whatever you like as you like.

    Sooner or later the fuddyduddies are going to all pass on and digital arts will be free (and used as advertising).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 23rd, 2010 @ 6:14pm

      Re: It's just sillyness

      Don't be silly, if they force you to listen to the same terrible song 50 times, you'll suddenly forget that it's a terrible song!

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Kevin Bondelli, Mar 23rd, 2010 @ 5:10pm

    Artists vs. Publishers

    What is interesting about stories like this is that it turns the talking points used by publishers on their heads. They argue that music piracy is primarily hurting the artists who are actually creating value. However we keep seeing artists who want to take advantage of a new model and the publishers prevent them from making decisions about their own music.

    Right now the band is getting nothing from the downloaded music. What Mike is saying is that by offering an official free download they can get emails and contact information from their fans in order to get them to shows, purchase merch, or even offer limited content to those who downloaded through the site.

    Wishing file sharing away isn't going to work, and publishers like Sony are preventing artists from adapting to a 21st century digital economy.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 23rd, 2010 @ 5:46pm

      Re: Artists vs. Publishers

      Well, filesharing won't go away with that kind of attitude. Thankfully ACTA will turn the internet into a broadcasting medium that can be controlled by a few gatekeepers and less like it is now, being a communications medium, controlled by all of its users.

      I can see why the legacy industries are pushing so hard for ACTA and secrecy.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    mrtraver (profile), Mar 23rd, 2010 @ 7:25pm

    whodunnit

    Anyone else think that MGMT leaked this themselves, a la Trent Reznor seeding NIN's Ghosts I-IV on torrent sites (only Ghosts I was officially available for free download from the NIN website)?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 23rd, 2010 @ 9:15pm

    I went to their website and listened to the entire album for free, so I guess that means I win?

    I didn't have to pay any money to hear the album. So all those lawsuits and the end result is the same as it was ten years ago?

    Shocking.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 23rd, 2010 @ 9:25pm

    "Why not?!? The music is already free. Not embracing it means people go elsewhere. Embracing it means a chance to earn money."

    You assume that everyone who downloads the music is a pirate and will illegally download it. This is simply not the case. Also, do you honestly think a few email addresses are worth the bandwidth and support it costs to host an an entire album?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Dirk Belligerent (profile), Mar 23rd, 2010 @ 9:54pm

    Just when I'm trying to think of a position stupider than Mike's constant diaper-filling because movie theaters aren't offering DVDs at the ticket window, in case anyone would rather not go into the big dark room with all those strangers after driving to the theater, along he comes with his cheerful burbling that "music is free," obviously thinking he's quite the savant.

    Many years ago, before the music biz cause was finally, irretrievably lost, some punk on a forum was talking about seeing some band opening at a show and how he was downloading everything they had online. I told him what the singer from Sevendust said about downloading, "At the end of the year, if our album didn't scan [SoundScan] enough copies, I'm back flipping burgers at McDonald's." The little brat didn't reply, but I'm starting to think he aged to become Mike.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 23rd, 2010 @ 9:57pm

      Re:

      The music industry is doing just fine, but please continue ranting, since it's entertaining.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Mike Masnick (profile), Mar 23rd, 2010 @ 10:20pm

      Re:

      Many years ago, before the music biz cause was finally, irretrievably lost

      Odd, multiple studies show the music industry has been growing both in terms of output and money. "Lost" seems to be defined differently in your book.

      I told him what the singer from Sevendust said about downloading, "At the end of the year, if our album didn't scan [SoundScan] enough copies, I'm back flipping burgers at McDonald's." The little brat didn't reply, but I'm starting to think he aged to become Mike.

      Ah, so you spoke to one idiot who didn't have a good business model, and because of that you want to condemn me for pointing people to business models that work?

      You have a really screwed up way of thinking.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    NAMELESS.ONE, Mar 23rd, 2010 @ 11:12pm

    "But by this logic, why should bands bother trying to sell their music at all? I think you could make that argument for any album out there today."

    YEA good idea dont sell the music go on tour you lazy gits and or play in bars

    sell some tshirts and mugs or somehting useful
    YA KNOW DO SOME REAL WORK

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Matthew, Mar 24th, 2010 @ 8:46am

    yay

    my first time having a story posted on techdirt :D

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    The Mad (Patent) Prosecutor, Mar 24th, 2010 @ 12:23pm

    "Hey everybody, the album leaked, and we wanted you to be able to hear it from us. We wanted to offer it as a free download but that didn't make sense to anyone but us "

    Oh really? Hmmmm, so the band can't understand: the band gets their advance from Sony, Sony intends to make back the advance through music sales, and Sony has no confidence that giving away something will help sales? Regardless of whether the band agrees with Sony's (intermediate) conclusions, Sony logic can be understood even by a "moron-in-a-hurry."

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    JoFresh, Mar 28th, 2010 @ 5:55pm

    it's def worth paying for

    I've been lucky enough to get a preview copy of the actual (non-leaked) new MGMT album, and... wow. This is gonna make them even more popular. Siiiick. I see why they called it Congratulations. http://bit.ly/c7gREl

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This