Careful What You Wish For: Greater IP Enforcement In China Being Used Against Foreign Companies...

from the you-asked-for-it... dept

Supporters of stronger intellectual property laws in other countries ought to be careful what they ask for... they just might get it, and then discover they didn't really want it after all. For example, for many, many years, US companies have been screaming loudly about how the US should pressure China to be more respectful of intellectual property. China, for example, regularly makes the "priority watch list" of the USTR's "Special 301" report, which is effectively a catalog of what countries US companies are complaining most about. However, China has suddenly taken an interest in intellectual property in the last few years, and it doesn't seem to be turning out quite like US companies expected.

First, a few years back, we wrote about a high profile counterfeit DVD bust in China, where the "culprit" was actually a rich American. Then, we noticed in 2008 that China was starting to talk about China cracking down on video game piracy, but only when it concerned others copying China's video games. Finally, late last year, we noted that a French company had lost a patent lawsuit in China.

It turns out that was just the beginning. Joe Mullin points us to a story about how there have been a series of recent patent and trademark rulings in Chinese courts all of which appear to be going against large multinational companies and in favor of Chinese companies.

Of course, this isn't a surprise at all. Various studies have shown that greater copyright, patent and trademark protections tend to follow a period of great innovation, when the companies that did that innovation look to protect their position from upstarts elsewhere. In other words, it acts in the exact opposite manner as it's supposed to. It's not an incentive to innovate, but a tool used to stop competition and innovation from others. The situation in China is playing out exactly according to that formula. The country is growing into a bigger believer in intellectual property laws -- but only for the sake of using it to protect against foreigners -- which, we assume, is not what US companies wanted, but which they should have expected if they ever bothered to look at the actual history of stronger intellectual property laws.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    icon
    Andrew F (profile), Apr 8th, 2010 @ 12:15am

    It might also be simple retaliation. The Chinese government probably views IP as protectionism, so ... tit for tat.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    MrSonPopo, Apr 8th, 2010 @ 1:11am

    Thank you, ocident

    Now you've messed up the global economy for the next few decades.

    Once China becomes the leading superpower again, we will all be suffering at their newly acquired taste for insane IP protectionism.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Richard (profile), Apr 8th, 2010 @ 2:21am

    When China gets on the IP bandwagon

    It will be their ORGANISED greed vs the West's DISORGANISED greed. Guess who's going to win...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 8th, 2010 @ 4:52am

    Where is east texaschun?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    NAMELESS.ONE, Apr 8th, 2010 @ 7:02am

    haha on americans

    this will end good

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Megore, Apr 8th, 2010 @ 7:39am

    Well its what the dumb asses wanted.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    www.eZee.se (profile), Apr 8th, 2010 @ 8:59am

    Whats that about ignoring history and it coming back to bite you on the ass? Well, dear greedy industries, your ass is grass and the Chinese are making a lot more lawnmowers ;))

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    william (profile), Apr 8th, 2010 @ 9:18am

    my simple prediction in previous articles are coming true.

    hooray?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Ian Channing (profile), Apr 9th, 2010 @ 2:51am

    Calling for better arguments against Patents

    I agree with the article, but not the last paragraph. In the last paragraph it's stated - "patent and trademark protections tend to follow a period of great innovation" then "In other words, it acts in the exact opposite manner as it's supposed to."

    The first statement is blindingly obvious. The innovations allow the inventors to apply for patents. This then doesn't actually imply the second statement.

    What would be useful to see was that innovation drops after a large swathe of patents.

    I know patents are abused, but the arguments put in the last paragraph are pretty poor.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Nathan Vegdahl (profile), Apr 11th, 2010 @ 2:16am

    Re: Calling for better arguments against Patents

    I think Mike meant that IP laws themselves become broader and stricter (or come into existence at all) after periods of great innovation. Meaning that the laws didn't exist as incentive when the innovation happened, but rather were put in place afterwards.

    I don't have a lot of background in that, so I can't verify it in a broad sense. But it's certainly true of software patents at the very least.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This