RSS
Google Fights Back And Wins Against Bogus Patent Lawsuit From Guy Who Couldn't Even Code His 'Invention'
from the a-win-in-east-texas! dept
Joe Mullin, in his usual incredibly thorough manner, has a detailed blog post about Google emerging victorious in a patent infringement lawsuit in East Texas, against one of many non-practicing entities to sue Google claiming patent infringement in the last few years (Mullin notes 46 filed since 2007). In this case, a husband and wife team received two patents (7,240,025 and 7,249,059) on putting ads on other websites, and claimed that Google's AdSense infringed. While there was no assertion whatsoever that Google got the idea from these patents -- and everyone seems to recognize that Google came up with, implemented and built up AdSense entirely independently, the holder of the patent thought he deserved 20% of all of Google's AdSense profits. Oh, and the kicker? He never even finished building the system himself, because the programming was beyond him:
As Mullin notes, Google appears to be one of a rather small number of big tech companies who are willing to stand up to such bogus patent lawsuits, rather than just paying them off to go away. Many other companies realize that it's cheaper to just pay off the patent holder than to fight it in court, but Google recognizes -- correctly -- that this just encourages more lawsuits of the same nature, and perpetuates the problem.
While being questioned by one of his lawyers, Dean told the jury that his limited knowledge of code-writing--derived from a junior college programming class--wasn't sufficient to allow him to complete the project. Instead, he hired his programming teacher to finish the job. Unfortunately, Dean and Stone ran out of money before the teacher was done. Dean insisted to the jury, though, that he could have finished the project...And yet he felt he deserves 20% of all of Google's AdSense revenue? Someone is clearly overvaluing the idea vs. the implementation. Thankfully, though, the jury actually recognized that Google was the victim here. Beyond finding that Google didn't infringe, the jury also found parts of the two patents to be invalid.
As Mullin notes, Google appears to be one of a rather small number of big tech companies who are willing to stand up to such bogus patent lawsuits, rather than just paying them off to go away. Many other companies realize that it's cheaper to just pay off the patent holder than to fight it in court, but Google recognizes -- correctly -- that this just encourages more lawsuits of the same nature, and perpetuates the problem.
I have a business...
Why 50,000 Monthly Active Users Weren't Enough To Stop This Company From Pivoting, With Spun Co-Founder Scott Lindenbaum
To Understand The Data Move It Closer
I’m looking for research...
The Growing App Market
Why Data Is The New Oil, With Dan Foreman Of Lumi Mobile
I’m looking for policy...
Application Developers Alliance Applauds Schumer Plan To Introduce Patent Legislation
Developers On Patents: Ron Garret of Awun
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Google
Elishia Windfohr
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Flip Side
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Flip Side
I can think of a few hardware ideas (in computing and otherwise) that make me thing "someone should invent that..." They're just different...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Flip Side
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Wiser to Fight
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
technically right
so just on these grounds the claim of this guy was valid
of course I don't know if his patent was valid or relevant to the case!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: technically right
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: technically right
That isn't true of any national patent law in Europe. Unfortunately it isn't a bad description of how the EPO (European Patent Office) operates.
Fortunately these patents have to be enforced under national law - which isn't required to follow the same rules.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
shill!!!
Permit me to educate you...Edison hired various skilled artisans to assist him on his inventions who provided skills or knowledge he was lacking in. Similarly, so did Bell on the telephone and Farnsworth on the TV. Often times 'inventors' as you say have the foresight, but lack specific knowledge or ability to complete their invention alone. You might consider that GM has more than one engineer working on the Corvette. Gawd, you are such a shill for invention theives!!!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Flip Side
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Inventor who is reputed to not be a strong programmer
It is unlikely that the author Mr. Masnick knows all the ins and outs of his server, or the other codes and code structures that permit him to denigrate something he really knows not a thing about.
Or in a less polite way- SHUT YOUR PIEHOLE MASNICK.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment