Confused Musician Threatens Google, Blog Because Her Works Are Found Elsewhere On The Internet

from the there-are-ignorant-people-on-all-sides-of-this-debate dept

If you look hard enough, on any side of a big debate, you can find people who are really ignorant, but not afraid to speak their minds. And, yes, this certainly includes those who are concerned about what has become of copyright law. You may recall that writer Mark Helprin wrote an entire book based on taking a few dumb comments from Techdirt out of context, and pretending that they were representative of the views of those who think copyright law has some serious problems. So, you have to be careful not to take a few ignorant comments and extrapolate further viewpoints on a particular subject. Still, sometimes, you come across an example of someone who is so willfully ignorant that it's difficult to know how to respond.

Take, for example, the ordeal that the site Torrentfreak recently went through, with famed 60s session musician Carol Kaye, who apparently doesn't quite understand how BitTorrent (or, potentially, the internet) works. Somehow, she got it into her head that Torrentfreak -- which is just a blog that writes about this stuff -- was distributing her works in an unauthorized manner. Of course, as a blog site that doesn't distribute any files, nothing could be further from the truth -- and the Torrentfreak folks tried to politely explain this to Ms. Kaye. They even went so far as to offer to contact the admins of certain torrent tracker sites about removing links to the files she was concerned about.

Rather than admit her mistake (and maybe even thank them for their help) she sent a series of increasingly angry emails, such as the following:
You're a liar, a pirate, and a thief and a no-body -- you're coming down buddy, don't give me that run-around BS! Whoever you are, you're THIEF AND A DELIBERATE PIRATE!
So much for helping. She also had her friends start emailing the TorrentFreak folks with similarly misguided emails. I'm reminded of a rather angry Hollywood lawyer who has blogged repeatedly bizarre (and totally false) claims about me -- saying that I (seriously) command an army of hackers who will vehemently attack any musician or songwriter who dares to disagree with me. Perhaps some readers here get a bit aggressive in responding to questionable statements made by musicians/songwriters, but you can always find some people who go too far -- on either side, as the experience of TorrentFreak demonstrates.

In the case of Carol Kaye, however, it looks like this isn't the only time she's been confused about how the internet works. Some folks note that on her own website is a statement suggesting that she thinks Google is responsible for unauthorized access to her content, and she's expecting the FTC to fix that:
Please do not download any of my books/CDs from Google. I filed FTC Complaint #25172648 against Google for those illegal downloads, don't be a pirate!
It might help if Ms. Kaye spoke to someone who could explain to her that Google is not the liable party here -- and the FTC isn't going to suddenly make Google liable just because Ms. Kaye is confused about how the internet works. But, then again, she might just accuse anyone who tries to help her of being a "thief." Clearly, Ms. Kaye is angry about some of her content being available in an unauthorized manner online, and seems uninterested in actually understanding how the content got there or what she can legitimately do in response. It's really too bad.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    icon
    Marcus Carab (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 7:39am

    These stories are so sad... someone clearly sat this women down and said "did you know people are downloading your music?" and then spat some buzzwords: TORRENTS! FILESHARING! P2P! GOOGLE! STEALING!

    Now she has crippling tunnel-vision. Many people would have shared her kneejerk reaction, but most wouldn't have dragged it out into such an extended campaign of stubborn misunderstanding. Whoever got her all up in arms over this did her a huge disservice.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Richard (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 7:58am

      Re:

      Now she has crippling tunnel-vision. Many people would have shared her kneejerk reaction, but most wouldn't have dragged it out into such an extended campaign of stubborn misunderstanding. Whoever got her all up in arms over this did her a huge disservice.

      Yes, once again we see that the real victims of copyright (and patent) law are exactly the people who are supposed to benefit from it. It is really sad to see someone get so worked up like this.

      Copyright law should be treated like cigarettes:

      WARNING BEING RIGHTSHOLDER MAY DAMAGE YOUR MENTAL HEALTH.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Designerfx (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 8:03am

      Re:

      you think it's bad now? It's likely to hit rock bottom before it gets any better. We're talking physical threats and such.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Valkor, Feb 24th, 2010 @ 7:56am

    Wow...

    I think my clue-o-meter just broke.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Poster, Feb 24th, 2010 @ 8:09am

    I sent her (and her "team") a couple of polite e-mails about this issue, trying to point out why they were being called out on this.

    They called the e-mails "harassment" and said they were getting the BBB in on this, too.

    I don't think Ms. Kaye or anyone associated with her has any idea how the Internet works.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Feb 24th, 2010 @ 9:36am

      Re:

      They probably dont understand how reality works either.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      violetleigh (profile), Dec 25th, 2011 @ 3:07am

      Clueless Kaye, Carol

      Ignorance is no excuse and if you have your own website and forum, it appears on the face of it that she does have a clue about how it works but chooses to be an ignorant hag.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Josh in CharlotteNC (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 8:12am

    Reminds me of

    That email reminds me of that town mayor (councilman maybe?) a few years ago that went ballistic on the makers of a Linux distro cause his server wasn't configured and he got the standard error message built into the distro. He starting sending emails to the claiming they were hackers and thieves, and wouldn't quit when they tried to refer him to his hosting company to get the thing fixed.

    Searched, but couldn't find the story.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Hephaestus (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 8:20am

    "I'm reminded of a rather angry Hollywood lawyer who has blogged repeatedly bizarre (and totally false) claims about me -- saying that I (seriously) command an army of hackers who will vehemently attack any musician or songwriter who dares to disagree with me. "

    Mike you views are wrong about some IP stuff, but you are consistant, and consistantly correct on most of the issues. Your army isnt a bunch of hackers. Its like minded individuals that just hate really stupid, self serving people. When they are pointed out they tend to get shown the error of their ways (hazed).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Emo the Libertarian (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 8:25am

    Commander Mike, when do you order the attack...LOL

    Seriously for a second: while I agree almost anyside of a debate has reactionaries and downright crazies, I really wish we could find away to keep them out of the light (on both sides) it would go along way in bringing together bothsides to make a "deal" both can live with.

    The mis-guided idiots always get heard loudest (thanks for thier headline grabbing ability, and the fact we all click, or read for the humor content) but what they really do is entrench both sides from working together to solve a problem (you see it in the US Congress R's V.s. D's, and on every single big issue, patent, copyright, trademark, you name it)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Hephaestus (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 8:33am

      Re:

      "but what they really do is entrench both sides from working together to solve a problem"

      Actually what makes both side not work together is "Quarterly Profits" vs "Constitutionality and Rights". Currently Profits is winning ... give it a little time and things will swing the other way :)

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Emo the Libertarian (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 10:00am

        Re: Re:

        Can't really say I agree.

        Yes, Company's have a profit motive, of course so do people, but that doesn't push them against the Constititution.

        Just like people like the think everything is a Right, but do not know the Constitution beyond yelling out what ever THEY want is a "protected" Right.

        The Constitution worked well for a long time in a free market society, and Companies had a need for Quarterly Profits then too...

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Hephaestus (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 10:28am

          Re: Re: Re:

          "Yes, Company's have a profit motive, of course so do people, but that doesn't push them against the Constititution."

          It is not a direct push against the constitution but a lack of understanding of what these little errosions of civil liberties all add up to. Slowly but surely they pile on top of one another. Eventually allowing for things like your ISP spying on everything that you send or recieve on the internet. That spying being done on behalf on a non government entity with out a warrant. Being able to be cut you off from essential services based on accusations and no due process.

          "Just like people like the think everything is a Right, but do not know the Constitution beyond yelling out what ever THEY want is a "protected" Right."

          People want their rights. They also want to not be burdened by entrenced monopolies that have the money to buy "protected" rights.

          "The Constitution worked well for a long time in a free market society, and Companies had a need for Quarterly Profits then too..."

          The Constitution did work and still does, the problem is now things are accelerated Faster travel, Faster communications, faster mail (e-mail), laws getting passed faster. In the past this abuse of power existed. In the past the courts worked at roughly the same rate that unconstitutional changes were made. Now the changes are happening faster because our ability to communicate has accelerated. The courts cant keep up because they move at a glacial rate.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            Emo the Libertarian (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 1:41pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            I agree that rights are being eroded at an accelerated rate (which in and of its self is cause for alarm) But I do not think that the "companies" deserve all of the blame, I lay that at the feet of the "polititians"/government in that they are
            1) creating the laws
            2) allowing the monopolies
            3) pushing the agenda of the lobbyist, which are set in place by some companies,and special interest groups

            I view the Courts, the Legislative, and Executive Branchs as the ultimate betrayers here because each and everyone took an oath to Uphold/Defend the Constitution not figure out ways around it, or put in more controls on what was supposed to be a free market... if they where doing their jobs the "company" mind set (Record Labels as a great example, and the Artist as well) would not be what it is today (entitlement and protectionist)... They became what they where taught by action or inaction of the government.

            And i have to say we the People get to share a portion of the blame as well, we allowed them to keep doing the same things and find more ways around rights, and teaching kids to be "entitled" to things... then the wheels came off and bang now everyone is mad... We should have forced this issue in the 80's and 90s we would be less indebt and they would have much less power than now.

            Think about this when they banned drinking in the US, it took a Constitutional Ammendment (because the Government rightly believed that they did not have the power to ban anything with out Ammending and the consent of the States) but after that was squashed and depression hit they banned things left/right/and center, no Ammendments to the Constitution needed...

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Hulser (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 8:42am

    Google is to phone book as...

    "Please do not download any of my books/CDs from Google. I filed FTC Complaint #25172648 against Google for those illegal downloads, don't be a pirate!"

    Maybe she also files official complaints against the White Pages when she gets telemarketing phone calls.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Chronno S. Trigger (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 8:43am

    "Please do not download any of my books/CDs from Google."

    Sure, I can do that (or not do that). I have no idea who Carol Kaye is so I probably won't download anything of her's from any of the sites that actually share things.

    Can I borrow the army for a few days. I want to attempt to teach Microsoft that they don't need half the crap that comes pre-installed in windows. Seriously, there are probably more security updates for Outlook Express then users of OE. (where's my SarcMark?)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Kaden (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 8:51am

      Re:

      Given that Carol Kaye is quite arguably the most recorded bassist in history, that may be a bit of a challenge.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Feb 24th, 2010 @ 9:34am

        Re: Re:

        She's 80 years old. What does she care if her songs get pirated?

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Chronno S. Trigger (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 9:45am

        Re: Re:

        Ok, now you made me look her up.

        If her Wikipedia article is complete, then she still has nothing to worry about from me. In fact, I'm now less likely to be introduced to her music and run the risk of downloading it.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    deadzone (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 8:55am

    :)

    That's great! Wow is she clueless. :)

    Sometimes you just need a good laugh to keep you sane. It also demonstrates once again that it's ignorance about the issues that is the root cause of all of these issues surrounding this debate.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Bengie, Feb 24th, 2010 @ 9:11am

    WTB Darwin award

    We can only hope she is removed from the gene pool. Too bad our current society even tries to protect people from themselves.

    Is she that person who caused high-chair makers put on a warning to "Remove Child before folding"?

    I think the best movie quote for her is "How long did you pee on the toilet before someone told you to lift the seat"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Perry K (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 9:13am

    :-)

    Carol Kaye should move to Italy then she'd be able to sue Google for the illegal downloads.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Bugsy, Feb 24th, 2010 @ 9:20am

    Except...

    Interesting how the article does not spend much time on the real issue: that her music is being pirated, and pirated from torrent based, pier sharing sites, etc. She is completely wrong in the direction of her anger but she is righteously angry. Her rants will fall on deaf ears because she has blamed the wrong people and she is apparently not that bright. But she is right on a much grander level. Her ignorance turns into an excuse to divert attention from the indisputable issue that is at the core of all these discussions, writers and performers are being ripped off.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      deadzone (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 9:29am

      Re: Except...

      Righteously angry but still woefully stupid and ignorant. The sad thing is: you missed the part in which they talk about how the falsely accused site offered to help her out only to receive an unhinged E-Mail back from her.

      In short, it's really not their problem or this site's problem, so why should they do anything outside of report what is happening?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Feb 24th, 2010 @ 9:38am

      Re: Except...

      Ripped off by whom? Labels have been ripping off writers and performers for years.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Feb 24th, 2010 @ 9:46am

      Re: Except...

      So is the consuming public. What's your point?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      rjk (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 9:49am

      Re: Except...

      Her ignorance turns into an excuse to divert attention from the indisputable issue that is at the core of all these discussions, writers and performers are being ripped off.

      I have a choice to make... I can legitimately purchase a $1 piece of plastic for $13 or I can download pirated music for $0. If I download pirated digital files, I'm a thief. If I pay $13 for a $1 piece of plastic the Artist is a thief.

      Until I can purchase a digital album (high quality format) for $2.50 or a CD for $5-7 writers and performers can keep their mouth shut.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      The Infamous Joe (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 9:49am

      Re: Except...

      the indisputable issue that is at the core of all these discussions, writers and performers are being ripped off

      I don't think you know what indisputable means.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      DocMenach (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 9:53am

      Re: Except...

      Interesting how the article does not spend much time on the real issue: that her music is being pirated, and pirated from torrent based, pier sharing sites, etc.....

      Did you say "pier sharing sites". I want a pier sharing site. My town only has one pier, and I get tired of fishing off the same pier all the time.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Free Capitalist (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 10:21am

        Re: Re: Except...

        I live in a landlocked town, and I would like to share piers too.


        Damn Pierates!

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Valkor, Feb 24th, 2010 @ 12:37pm

        Re: Re: Except...

        Pier to Pier file sharing! Arrrrr! Avast me hardies!
        We sail with the morning tide, our hold full of Spanish Doubloons and illicit MP3s! YO HO!

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Dementia (profile), Feb 26th, 2010 @ 5:56am

        Re: Re: Except...

        I want to be able to fish from multiple piers at the same time. Isn't that what pier sharing is?

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        violetleigh (profile), Dec 25th, 2011 @ 3:16am

        Re: Re: Except...

        I was going to comment on the pier as well. But, in my recent Anthropology class, I was referred to as a "human bean" (sic) so while the pier thing is funny, being a "bean" is funnier.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Dom S, Feb 24th, 2010 @ 9:53am

      Re: Except...

      "Her ignorance turns into an excuse to divert attention from the indisputable issue that is at the core of all these discussions, writers and performers are being ripped off."

      valid point, but i think YOU ignore the fact that most artists are inherently ripped off by the labels they sign to and most other mainstream distributors are constantly screwing artists.
      the RECORDING industry does exactly that, record musicians work. they dont create the music, they dont write the music (mostly, although pop-puppets are the exception - i.e. manufactured boy/girlbands etc) and therefore they dont have the inherent right to the majority of the profits from the music they RECORD (although they have set their business model up in this way).
      if they (i.e. the recording industry) want to sit around and complain about piracy and how its "killing the music industry", let them. the rest of us will watch as they crash and burn and enjoy our non-mainstream entertainment, recorded and produced by truly talented individuals/groups who will flourish when they dont have to compete with the monopolistic labels who pollute the industry.

      the "real" issue is not at dispute here. the article is highlighting how this woman is clearly wrong and misguided in her efforts to sue/threaten google etc. the article is not skipping over the piracy element, just pointing out how moronic this woman is being.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Feb 24th, 2010 @ 9:53am

      Re: Except...

      Sorry, you're wrong.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Rose M. Welch (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 10:15am

      Re: Except...

      "...her music is being pirated...writers and performers are being ripped off."

      It's possible that she owns the rights to her music, but most writers and performers whose works are being shared do not. So, you should amend your statement to the following:

      ...the record label's music is being pirated...the record label is being ripped off.".

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Richard (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 10:22am

      Re: Except...

      But she is right on a much grander level. Her ignorance turns into an excuse to divert attention from the indisputable issue that is at the core of all these discussions, writers and performers are being ripped off.

      There is the real problem.

      They THINK they are being ripped off. Whether (objectively) they are or not is not relevant.

      If you go around thinking you are being ripped off you will end up in a sorry state.

      If you free your output you will also free yourself.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    :), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 9:28am

    That one is funny :)

    I wonder what face she will do when people still pirate her "art" in other places?

    Probably she will sue the ISP's, the cable guy and other LoL

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Tom Landry (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 9:42am

    She's old so she'll be dead soon. No more problem.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Redwulf (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 9:45am

    Wow...

    Apparently, this old lady never heard of a band called Metallica...and how efficiently and effectively they discharged a large-caliber round through their collective foot. Interestingly, I'd never heard of this woman, so publicity has been effectively generated. Unfortunately (for her) it is very negative, and guarantees that I will never explore any of her works at any time. I certainly won't be giving her any money.

    It's called 'greed' old lady. Some call it 'killing the golden goose'. I'd say that any washed-up old singer would be tickled pink and purple to have their songs pirated. It would at least be getting them some attention, perhaps even connecting with a new generation. Supporting it or laughing it off would definitely go a long way to help this. Railing against it? Well, you're about to find out what that'll do.

    Say 'hi' to Lars when you go for your next unemployment check?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      violetleigh (profile), Dec 25th, 2011 @ 3:23am

      Re: Wow...

      Thanks, Redwulf, for your interesting input. I will say, though, that singers are generally the ones ripped off by old musicians (that is what she is, NOT a singer, but a sideman or sidewoman).

      She used cuts I paid for on her recording promoting herself and when I had the cojones to call her on her use of the tracks and making money and not properly compensating me for her worldwide complicity to distribute, she then labeled me as a so-so singer. The tracks and the voice speak for themselves, however, she is in a position to viciously and without impunity, denigrate any artist who calls her on her piracy.

      She is old and will die soon and that is a good thing. This is not a rant but just a comment upon what transpired in dealings with this old bag.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    The Buzz Saw (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 9:53am

    Army of Hackers

    I thought I was part of the Masnick Elite! Why did you crush my dreams???

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    MikeC, Feb 24th, 2010 @ 9:53am

    Who is Carol Kaye?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Kirk (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 10:05am

    Backlash

    It looks like the forum on her website is closed for comments. Oops.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 24th, 2010 @ 10:09am

    The threats to linux over the default apache message

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/03/24/tuttle_centos/

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Flakey, Feb 24th, 2010 @ 10:18am

    Stealing her music

    Oh please, it's folk like this that gives any sort of credence to the idea that you should be licensed to surf the internet.

    Mrs. Kaye will not have to worry about me downloading her music for free but then she won't have to worry about me buying it either. I don't download music. Nor would I support artists so worried about aged material from 40 years ago being of the same value that present day rates bring for the hot items.

    No doubt her label or publisher has told her she doesn't make as much on royalties as she used to. Instead of telling her it is aged material and not worth as much, they have probably sent her on a snipe hunt of it's those pirates on the interpipes stealing to get her out of their hair.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Ron, Feb 24th, 2010 @ 10:31am

    According to her website, she and her band owns the record label.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Smack Down, Feb 24th, 2010 @ 10:45am

    Slap...

    Some of these buzz-word spewing cronnies seem to have P2P version of Tourette syndrome.

    Cronnie: "Hi, I'm Bob... P2P!"

    Song writer: "What?"

    Cronnie: "Oh, I was just saying that... GOOGLE DOWNLOAD ILLEGAL TORRENT!!!"

    Song writer: "What's that about Google?"

    Cronnie: "P2P! ILLEGAL! TORRENT! TORRENT! DOWNLOAD! GOOGLE! FISHHEAD!"

    Song writer: "Google is doing something illegal?"

    Cronnie: "Well, I was trying to say... TORRENT! P2P! BIT TORRENT! GOOGLE! ILLEGAL!"

    Song writer: "Oh my... that sounds serious... I should um..."

    Cronnie: "TORRENT! TORRENT! DOWNLOAD ILLEGAL! FREAK!"

    Song writer: "Maybe... call the FTC?"

    Cronnie: (Nodding) "TORRENT! ILLEGAL DOWNLOAD! P2P! UNAUTHORIZED!"

    Song writer: "Let me look up the number... do you know how to connect to the internet on my computer?"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    NAMELESS.ONE, Feb 24th, 2010 @ 11:02am

    WHAT SHE said was a threat

    going down as in dead , as in shut down ?

    its illegal to threaten people in that manner

    and doom9.org wasn't a secret website
    sounds to me like TAM is back just hiding again

    what does 50 year copyright do for you citizen?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 24th, 2010 @ 11:17am

    They'll just point to this to show why they need internet licenses.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Art, Feb 24th, 2010 @ 11:25am

    Dear Ms. Kaye

    Your CDs are located in a big dumptruck somewhere, along with Ted "the tubes" Stevens's emails.

    Sincerely,
    The Internet

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    @KSL, Feb 24th, 2010 @ 11:35am

    Education man

    This would be less sad, if it were a single incident but its so clear that the "have" and "have no freakin clue (*hnfc*)" gap is pretty steep and getting steeper. Mix a little social media into the picture and it gets even more "magic-mo-jo" scary for the "hnfc" class.

    We need refrain from judging and reach out to teach people about the "new world" - information sharing, collaborative success, etc. set the example. Keep doing the right thing for the right reasons and it will all work out - they just don't know (yet) how much better it is here.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Monarch (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 11:37am

    From the quotes I've read attributed to her, I think she needs to start taking her meds again. Maybe she fired her shrink and accused him of being a pirate for prescribing generic drugs. Who knows, but she definitely needs those meds to make her close to sane.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    yozoo, Feb 24th, 2010 @ 11:56am

    helter skelter

    "I'm reminded of a rather angry Hollywood lawyer who has blogged repeatedly bizarre (and totally false) claims about me -- saying that I (seriously) command an army of hackers who will vehemently attack any musician or songwriter who dares to disagree with me."

    Just tell us when to strike mike!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 24th, 2010 @ 12:06pm

    Soylent Green!!!

    The internets should have an age limit - anyone X cannot log in and has to use EBooks

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    The Groove Tiger (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 12:23pm

    "Deliberate Pirate" sounds awesome tho.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    EVIL_BASTARD, Feb 24th, 2010 @ 12:38pm

    Carol Kaye = not sane

    Carol Kaye is mentally not sound. She angry and bitter, and really upset that she is not James Jamerson.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Dave, Feb 24th, 2010 @ 12:41pm

    sad.

    Carol Kaye was once a skilled musician. Now she has just about as much of a clue about how the internet works as my mother does.

    Authors seem to share this malady. Because they're published, they somehow seem to think that their expertise extends to just about everything. Right-brainers. Funny.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    SeekMocha (profile), Feb 24th, 2010 @ 3:25pm

    Sue the Post Office

    Carol Kaye suing Google for delivering users to TorrentFreak is equivalent to suing the Post Office for delivering junk mail. Wait, can I do that?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    AlienDK, Feb 24th, 2010 @ 3:52pm

    alzheimers

    Maybe she has alzheimers, and maybe she should live the rest of her days in a retirement center? :).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 25th, 2010 @ 5:31am

    There's now a group on Facebook about this.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    david in atlanta, May 3rd, 2010 @ 11:22am

    Carol Kaye's other weirdness

    According to the author of "Standing in the Shadows of Motown" a bio of James Jamerson, a motown regular,Kaye has repeatedly tried to take credit for his work
    http://www.bassland.net/jamerson.html

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    joseph, May 8th, 2010 @ 10:24am

    what we're here for....CAROL KAYE

    I HAVE BEEN AROUND MUSIC MOST OF MY LIFE, I HAVE SPOKEN TO ALOT OF ARTISTS AND RECORD CO. PEOPLE..AS YOU ALL KNOW, PEOPLE WILL TRY AND STEAL YOUR GOOD NAME...I BELIEVE THAT CAROL IS ONLY WATCHING OUT FOR HER INVESTMENT SO TO SPEAK, THAT HAS TAKEN MOST OF HER LIFE OF CONTRIBUTION...THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS, SHE DID RECORD FOR MOTOWN...SHE WAS ALWAYS READY FOR WORK...DOCUMENTS PROOVE THAT MR. JAMESON,GOD REST HIS SOUL,WAS A PROBLEM AT THE STUDIO'S. I TRULY BELIEVE THAT MOTOWN, because of MR.JAMESON'S DEATH,did in fact change everything around to make it look like he had played on said records.....hey, if the U.S goverment can do cover up's...so can't motown..they're a very powerful country in themselves... REMEMBER...MOST OF THE PEOPLE THAT ARE WRITING THEY'RE COMMENTS,including my-self, WERE NOT THERE AT SAID SESSIONS,NOR DO WE HAVE ACCESS TO UNION CONTRACTS...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    violetleigh (profile), Dec 25th, 2011 @ 3:01am

    Carol Kaye

    She is deluded into thinking that she actually played on Jamerson's recordings. She also has no problem promoting herself on tracks that she didn't pay for and when called on it, denigrates the artist. Yes, she does. I hope this old hag dies and goes away soon! It would be a blessing to the music business and innocent bystanders whose lives have been affected by this heiffer.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This