Libraries Cost Publishers $100 Billion Per Year! Ban Them!

from the this-is-fun dept

So a whole bunch of you submitted the story last week about a "study" claiming that unauthorized downloads of books was "costing" the publishing industry $3 billion per year. I avoided the study for a variety of reasons. Mainly, the reason I ignored it was because it was done by a company selling "solutions" to the (non) "problem," Attributor is a company that has a very long history of putting out totally ridiculous studies like this to try to sell more of its pointless service. And, of course, if you looked at the details of the study, you realized how ridiculous it was -- designed solely to generate headlines. So we ignored it.

However... we feel compelled to mention it now because Slashdot points us to an absolutely brilliant response by a blogger who used the same basic methodology to point out that, according to this line of thinking, libraries are costing publishers $100 billion per year:
Hot on the heels of the story in Publisher's Weekly that "publishers could be losing out on as much $3 billion to online book piracy" comes a sudden realization of a much larger threat to the viability of the book industry. Apparently, over 2 billion books were "loaned" last year by a cabal of organizations found in nearly every American city and town. Using the same advanced projective mathematics used in the study cited by Publishers Weekly, Go To Hellman has computed that publishers could be losing sales opportunities totaling over $100 Billion per year, losses which extend back to at least the year 2000. These lost sales dwarf the online piracy reported yesterday, and indeed, even the global book publishing business itself.

From what we've been able to piece together, the book "lending" takes place in "libraries". On entering one of these dens, patrons may view a dazzling array of books, periodicals, even CDs and DVDs, all available to anyone willing to disclose valuable personal information in exchange for a "card". But there is an ominous silence pervading these ersatz sanctuaries, enforced by the stern demeanor of staff and the glares of other patrons. Although there's no admission charge and it doesn't cost anything to borrow a book, there's always the threat of an onerous overdue bill for the hapless borrower who forgets to continue the cycle of not paying for copyrighted material.
Good stuff. The blog post goes on to discuss a shifty "meeting" of so-called "librarians" set out to destroy the publishing industry. Satire at its finest. Of course will the mainstream press remember this the next time Attributor puts out some silly report? Probably not...


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    icon
    Matthew Cruse (profile), Jan 20th, 2010 @ 2:09pm

    /sarcasm

    hey, did the auther pay his licensing fee for the sarcmarc? If not he's in for a world of legal hurt.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    Matthew Cruse (profile), Jan 20th, 2010 @ 2:10pm

    Re: /sarcasm

    "author" speling-FAIL

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    icon
    P.Jacob (profile), Jan 20th, 2010 @ 2:14pm

    I will be smiling all the way to the library

    I recently decided to donated a big portion of my personal DVD library. Yes dear Hollywood producers, you are going to loses a few more sales! LOL!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 20th, 2010 @ 2:21pm

    Re: Re: /sarcasm

    *cough*

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    icon
    jjmsan (profile), Jan 20th, 2010 @ 2:21pm

    Libraries

    I have heard serious arguments that libraries should have to pay a license fee to lend books for that very reason.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    icon
    ObjectiveR (profile), Jan 20th, 2010 @ 2:23pm

    What more needs to be said?

    "Attributor is an early stage start-up, creating a DNA map of the Internet"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 20th, 2010 @ 2:42pm

    I saw the posting on Slashdot and wondered how long till it got here. Good humor...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 20th, 2010 @ 2:54pm

    On Libraries

    A city I used to live in recently made an executive decision to close a library. The area HOA responsible for donating the land is now suing the city because the land was originally donated to The City on the basis that they would create a Library and staff it for fifty years.

    Granted technological progress changes things, I believe that people should live up to their obligations. Folks like Amazon, Wikipedia, Google and others who want to indirectly become the World's Library should consider their effect on the established world around them.

    I know I'm dreaming, and such a suggestion may cause a flame war, but it would be a win-win-win if libraries were given a reason to exist. If content providers made more information available at libraries over Google. A libraries that had expanded search options, and digital versions of all the newspapers and all books to exist.

    I know I will butt heads with Mike, but today, there are few reasons to visit a library, and I don't want to see it bulldozed and turned into a city owned mini-mart.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Justin Roberts, Jan 20th, 2010 @ 3:05pm

    Purpose of Libraries

    People need to bare in mind why we have Libraries in the first place.

    It was so those poorer people whom couldn't afford access to information resources would still be able to, compared to those more wealthy citizens that had no trouble purchasing such material.

    Now admittedly we have come a long way from such distinct class issues and differences, but even today many people still can't afford to by a book, let alone a PC or Laptop to access this wealth of information. If charges are placed on these services, then once again it will be those in the community that can least afford it that will be hurt the most.

    Maybe the Administration might want to think about which constituints it wants to look after more - Hollywood / Publishing Industries / Recording Industries, etc, representing people who most likely have never set foot in a Library in their life, and wouldn't need to, or those who will find their chances of bettering themselves in society cut off if their access to free information is cut off as well.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 20th, 2010 @ 3:09pm

    Re: Purpose of Libraries

    Right. So we take control away from the Government Library Model and replace it with a PPV business model subsidized by market desires.

    Genius. Evil, but Genius.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    NullOp, Jan 20th, 2010 @ 3:23pm

    Cost?

    This is just the sort of thing that could spiral into some really stupid shit. 'Studies" such as the one mentioned are potentially harmful to the few good things that exist in American society. All it takes is some bored lawyer or a ill informed, moronic congressperson, take your pick, to blow this up into a real something. The site that started this stupid crap needs to be taken down! NOW!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 20th, 2010 @ 3:29pm

    Re: I will be smiling all the way to the library

    "I recently decided to donated a big portion of my personal DVD library. Yes dear Hollywood producers, you are going to loses a few more sales! LOL!"

    You do know that the majority of book and media/DVD/CD donations to libraries end up on the library book sale tables in monthly, quarterly or annual sales to the public? It's highly likely those DVDs you donated never hit the library shelves at all. Even worse, some library systems contract out to slimeball booksellers, giving them first crack at the good stuff for resale, which is why most of the time, you can't find shit at library book sales anymore.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 20th, 2010 @ 3:54pm

    HEY!! Shouldn't that story have that SarcMarc tag around it? That author could be in VERY BIG TROUBLE for having that kind of sarcasm on the internet without using that copyrighted mark explained here:

    http://techdirt.com/articles/20100115/1200127774.shtml

    Very deep ****.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    icon
    Nastybutler77 (profile), Jan 20th, 2010 @ 3:54pm

    Re: Re: /sarcasm

    Maybe this was intentional, but "spelling" spelling-FAIL...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    icon
    Chargone (profile), Jan 20th, 2010 @ 4:08pm

    Re: On Libraries

    Huh. The city libraries here seem to be doing well (Christchurch, New Zealand, that is). the only one there was even consideration about closing was due to it being too small and too close to another one.

    of course, apart from the main central library, all the others are also 'council service centers' where people can pay their rates (basically a local utilities and services tax, which covers the libraries themselves, as well as water, general city maintenance, whatever stupid plans the council takes it into their heads to undertake in a given year, and probably some other stuff). most of them provide at least limited internet access now too. it helps that they're all linked up in one system, as well.

    some also offer conference rooms, or contain cafe's...

    they all get plenty of use from people of all ages, too.

    i dunno, maybe it's different in the USA or where ever...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    icon
    Chargone (profile), Jan 20th, 2010 @ 4:11pm

    Re:

    ... ya know, I'm fairly sure that, at This point, you'd get in trouble for using it without license, not for failing to use it.

    you know, just in case you weren't joking there...

    at least until someone gets around to seeing a way to make enough money to justify the hassle in getting that changed...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    icon
    Steve R. (profile), Jan 20th, 2010 @ 4:17pm

    Another Broken Window Fallacy

    Maybe the publishers really lost $100 billion. But then the people who borrowed the free books, being very innovative, added $200 billion dollars to the economy based on what they learned in those books. The free market at work.

    Just because one sector of the economy "looses" doesn't mean that our entire economy looses. In fact the economy, overall, is probably stronger because of the free exchange of information.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    icon
    Tom Landry (profile), Jan 20th, 2010 @ 4:22pm

    part of me wishes that Publishers would go that route (litigation against libraries) as it would cause such social outrage that people would educate themselves about the tactics of of not only publishers but music/movie industry parasites as well.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    identicon
    bob, Jan 20th, 2010 @ 4:44pm

    Go To Hellman

    The article is worth the time it take to read it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 20th, 2010 @ 6:03pm

    The entertainment industry should take the publishing industry to court over unauthorized use of their loss fabrication formula.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    identicon
    semantics, Jan 20th, 2010 @ 6:15pm

    Re: Libraries

    "I have heard serious arguments that libraries should have to pay a license fee to lend books for that very reason."

    Serious arguments - I don't think so...

    I would agree with "seriously misguided attempts at persuasion"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    icon
    Mike Masnick (profile), Jan 20th, 2010 @ 7:12pm

    Re: Another Broken Window Fallacy

    Heh. Steve, the $100 billion number is a joke. It's making the same point you are. It's satire.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    identicon
    Darrel, Jan 20th, 2010 @ 9:08pm

    Libraries - The Original File Sharers!

    Government sponsored file sharing, who woulda thunk it?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24.  
    identicon
    Luci, Jan 20th, 2010 @ 10:10pm

    Re: On Libraries

    Conference rooms, cafes, audio/video, periodicals, references, fact and fiction, artwork and rare books... Are you so certain there are few reasons to visit a library? Or have you just not been to your's in a while? It's hard for me to imagine not having libraries around, let alone having them with so few patrons as to close them up.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  25.  
    identicon
    hhaha, Jan 21st, 2010 @ 1:17am

    just close them let ht epublishers hav the money

    ya know
    if the goal is to absolutely make america a bunch a retards your spot on and right on track

    i say ok let em ban or remove millions form the book shelves
    YUP
    go for it
    and in 10 years you will see the effect.

    stupid
    dumb retarded
    go america
    BE #1

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  26.  
    icon
    John Fenderson (profile), Jan 21st, 2010 @ 7:12am

    Re: On Libraries

    "I know I'm dreaming, and such a suggestion may cause a flame war, but it would be a win-win-win if libraries were given a reason to exist. If content providers made more information available at libraries over Google. A libraries that had expanded search options, and digital versions of all the newspapers and all books to exist."

    Hmmm...

    Here in my medium-sized city, the library is thriving and completely relevant. It's fully connected to the internet, such that I can look through it's catalog, reserve books, CDs, DVDs, and all sorts of things to be picked up later. Some video & audio can be streamed over the net, even, when copyright allows. In short, it's hard to imagine doing a better job at leveraging the internet.

    It wasn't always this way -- for a time, there was some question about its survival. Then it reinvented itself and is more popular than ever. Yay libraries!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  27.  
    identicon
    MCR, Jan 21st, 2010 @ 7:19am

    Re: On Libraries

    Why can't Google be your library? Why does the library even need to be at a physical location?

    Don't get me wrong, I loved going to the library as a kid. And I do actually prefer reading a physical book (as opposed to an e-reader). However, if the content can be spread more effectively through digital means, I think it would be counter-productive to limit digital libraries accessible through the internet.

    The very idea behind creating public libraries was education and content distribution, paid for by the government (and charity).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  28.  
    identicon
    batch, Jan 21st, 2010 @ 9:40am

    Re: Re: I will be smiling all the way to the library

    Hollywood doesn't make money off secondhand sales.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  29.  
    icon
    Chargone (profile), Jan 21st, 2010 @ 1:24pm

    Re: Re: Re: I will be smiling all the way to the library

    Hollywood doesn't make money off Most book sales, so far as i can tell...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  30.  
    identicon
    Haha, NOOBS, Jan 21st, 2010 @ 5:01pm

    haha

    At least I can make lost sales while being legal :)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  31.  
    identicon
    Lucky Taylor, Jan 22nd, 2010 @ 10:31am

    Libraries

    Is this just idle chatter or are you ready to do something about this? Point the finger inward voters and non-voters: http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/NewsBreaks/Voters-and-Public-Library-Funding-An-OCLC- Market-Research-Report-50000.asp Conspiracy with the libraries? I should believe that your volume about the state of the U.S. dollar would blow my ear drums. Take care.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  32.  
    identicon
    T, Jan 25th, 2010 @ 4:58am

    Re: Re: Libraries

    Many libraires in countries ot her than the US pay a fee to authors for their loss of revenue due to library borrowing.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  33.  
    identicon
    T, Jan 25th, 2010 @ 5:01am

    Re: Re: On Libraries

    Google can't be your library because you are less good at finding things than you think you are, and Google is less good at finding things than you think it is.

    For leisure reading, sure, Google all you like.

    For serious information about serious questions? Google's no better than the median usefulness of its most popular websites, and given that the web is full of snake-oil salesmen, con artists, distracted spiritualists and self-appointed experts, that's not much good. Why not get a skilled researcher, with access to information of known high quality, to help you out?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  34.  
    identicon
    Jeannette S., Sep 6th, 2013 @ 12:06pm

    Libraries

    Mr. Masnick;

    You put a lot of background work into your article. How did you obtain all the information? Did you have a place to go to when this article was penned? You seem to be one of the new young computer generation prodigies. Nothing wring with that, as many of us adopted a keyboard and retired our typewriters.

    Libraries were originally the result of our country's efforts to make sure that our young people were given the highest level of education that we as a people could afford. Any member of the community, young or old can go to this location and grow in literary knowledge and experience.

    I believe that libraries are necessary for two reasons. First, not every family can afford a computer or the extra expense of the internet. We still have three economic classes and responsible for the education of all. Secondly, the library houses a vast treasure trove of books that cannot be found anywhere else as they do not bring in enough profit for Barnes and Noble, etc. Where else can you go to get titles that have been out of print for eighty years? What about books printed 150 years ago? How titles that are so rare that you need the presence of a librarian to examine them?

    I like the library. They are vast treasure troves that have their own place in our society. As for the possible millions in sales that they supposedly deny the retail markets; ever hear of the expression, "You can't squeeze blood from a turnip?"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This