Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

•  

  

  zcat (profile), Jan 8th, 2010 @ 5:50pm

  
  

  To be honest, I totally agree with ANY move that makes 'ringbacks' go away. The couple of times I've called a number with 'ringback' music I have immediately hung up assuming a faulty line, because the only time I expect to hear music over the top of an outgoing call is when there's a faulty connection and my phone is picking up a nearby AM station. The entire concept of ringback music is pointless technowankery and basically annoys the hell out of me.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  mrtraver (profile), Jan 8th, 2010 @ 5:58pm

  
  

  Re:

  @zcat: I second that!

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  zcat (profile), Jan 8th, 2010 @ 6:14pm

  
  

  Re:

  Oh, and also IMHO a ringback tone is very much in the same category as 'hold music' in terms of performance. I don't agree that hold music should have to pay a performance licence, but given that it does it seems quite consistent that ringback tones should pay the same.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Chunky Vomit, Jan 9th, 2010 @ 6:33am

  
  

  Re:

  Ringback tones are just a costly way to tell people that the user is a douche.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Jake, Jan 8th, 2010 @ 5:59pm

  
  

  On the other hand, I never would have even heard of ringback tones if not for this lawsuit, so maybe they're shooting for a Streisand Effect.
  
  Not going to get me to waste money on something so frivolous, mind you.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, Jan 8th, 2010 @ 6:00pm

  
  

  I feel like such an aging goober. I didn't realize there was a difference between a ringtone and a ringback. Thanks for keeping me in the loop, Mike.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Chargone (profile), Jan 8th, 2010 @ 9:26pm

  
  

  Re:

  well, I'd never heard of a ringback tone, so there you go.
  
  (that said, i barely even use our land line phone, let alone a cell... yay internet.)

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, Jan 8th, 2010 @ 9:02pm

  
  

  http://xkcd.com/479/
  
  Although...I'd pay good money for a ringback that spouted out derogatory language about whomever is not answering their phone.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Jerry in Detroit, Jan 9th, 2010 @ 9:01am

  
  

  RE:

  Best way to deal with this is to focus attention on BMI. T-Mobile should boycott BMI and make sure that everyone who complains is told that BMI caused this. Turn off the T-Mobile ring tone store, cancel renewals on any BMI ring tones, and BMI is not allowed into the T-Mobile system from any 3rd party.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Hephaestus (profile), Jan 10th, 2010 @ 5:49pm

  
  

  Re: RE:

  I agree just ban BMI ringbacks. Use the example taught by youtube ... "F" you! you need us more than we need you... and be done with it. Then tell your customers due to a law suit with BMI we will be charging you for the use of all BMI music... here is a list of music that we will not charge for.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, Jan 9th, 2010 @ 10:27am

  
  

  While I fully support banning BMI from T-Mobile, I do understand the possible ringback-hold music correlation. Just because you've purchased the rights to certain music, doesn't give you the rights to perform it for someone else, and that's in essence what you're doing with a ringback tone. However, since you're not performing the song in its entirety, it might come under the "fair use" doctrine. Pretty grey area, but BMI AND ringback tone users both end up as douches!

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Yosi, Jan 10th, 2010 @ 7:21am

  
  

  Re:

  >> Just because you've purchased the rights to certain music, doesn't give you the rights to perform it for someone else
  
  By this "logic" when you've bought a CD you can't play it on your birthday party. Or wait, it gets even better:
  
  >> ...since you're not performing the song in its entirety
  
  So you will play only half of each song? And then watch together half of DVD you rented.
  
  One word - idiot.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, Jan 9th, 2010 @ 11:02pm

  
  

  BMI = Buttheads Morons & Idiots!

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Lachlan Hunt (profile), Jan 10th, 2010 @ 3:02pm

  
  

  "On Hold" Music

  This is very different from a ringtone. With a ringtone, the owner of the phone owns a copy of the track being played on their device, to them, and maybe a few people who happen to be in earshot of the phone.
  
  I've not experienced ringback tones before, and until reading this article I had never heard of them. But the idea seems like it has more in common with on-hold music that many companies play when they put you on hold or when you're in a call centre queue. The only difference seems to be that this music is playing to the caller while the phone is ringing, rather than after the call has been answered, and it's being played by the telco, rather than the callee.
  
  I'm fairly sure the companies that do that have to licence the music for use on-hold, at least in Australia (I'm not sure about the US rules, but I'd assume they're similar). But assuming that in the US companies do have to licence it then, then surely those rules would apply to this too.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, Jan 10th, 2010 @ 10:47pm

  
  

  Ringbacks are in fact the product of Le Douche!
  
  If you ever call someone who uses a ringback, be sure to punch them in the face next time you see them.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Valkor, Jan 11th, 2010 @ 10:00am

  
  

  Re:

  Agreed.
  Nothing says "I love music" like making someone listen to your favorite song through a crappy cell phone earpiece.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Vince, Jan 14th, 2010 @ 9:07pm

  
  

  I had no idea what ringbacks were; I thought they were the same as ringtones. Can you create your own ringbacks, like you do ringtones? I've seen sites like mobilespin.net that have tools for you to create ringtones for free, but not ringbacks.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  The Best BMI Calculator, May 9th, 2013 @ 2:07am

  
  

  The Best Body Mass Index Calculator

  A person’s body mass index is a number calculated based on their height and weight. It is used for a comparative analysis of people with similar heights. The body mass index is a brainchild of a Belgian statistician and mathematician named Adolphe Quatelet who created the BMI sometime from1830 to 1850. To calculate the BMI, divide the person’s weight in kilograms by their height in meters squared.
  
  History of Body Mass Index
  The Body Mass Index has been in use as a medical benchmark for obesity and is the statistical estimate for Adiposity. It is also the standard employed by the WHO (World Health Organization) for its obesity statistics.
  
  This number was introduced to the public through the government’s efforts to promote sanguinity, nutritional knowledge, and healthy eating habits. This simple statistic has rendered itself very important since it can adapt itself to continuous changes inherent in a community and can indicate the economic development on a nutritional basis.
  
  http://www.coconutoil4health.co.uk/body-mass-index/

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

Add Your Comment