DailyDirt: Toys Are Too Cool For Kids

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

Technology has come a long way in the last few decades. Just about every computer (or smartphone) we use now is vastly more powerful than the primitive electronics that helped put astronauts on the surface of the moon. Gadgets are getting so cheap that toys are becoming impressively advanced. Here are just a few examples.

By the way, StumbleUpon can also recommend some good Techdirt articles, too.

Filed Under: , , , , , , ,
Companies: lego

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “DailyDirt: Toys Are Too Cool For Kids”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
14 Comments
Lawrence D'Oliveiro says:

XCKD Non-Free

It doesn?t matter what Munroe says, what matters is what the licence says:

You may not exercise any of the rights granted to You … in any manner that is primarily intended for or directed toward commercial advantage or private monetary compensation.

Now, this site is run as a commercial business, is it not? After all, you have a big ?Reasons To Buy? header at the top, and you regularly mention the paid work you do for clients.

Mike Masnick (profile) says:

XCKD Non-Free

It doesn?t matter what Munroe says, what matters is what the licence says:

That’s ridiculous on two different points.

1. It absolutely DOES matter what Munroe says because he’d be the one to enforce any license.

2. Linking to a website is not infringement — especially when it’s the authorized work.

Honestly, why even bring this up?

Lawrence D'Oliveiro says:

XCKD Non-Free

>It absolutely DOES matter what Munroe says because
>he’d be the one to enforce any license.

Does it really? If he was going to spell out the terms of use himself, why does he bother using a canned CC licence at all? How many places are we supposed to look to find out the terms of use?

>Linking to a website is not infringement

That?s not what the judge said in issuing the injunction against linking to the DeCSS code.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...