Share/E-mail This Story

Email This



Microsoft Caught Copying Software Code In China...

from the piracy? dept

Lots of folks have been submitting the story of Microsoft's China operations being caught with its fingers in the cookie jar in directly copying the code from a small company called Plurk. This isn't just the look and feel that was copied, but it appears that some of the code itself was directly copied. Of course, this seems doubly amusing, since Microsoft has, in the past, been at the forefront of complaining about "piracy" in China -- even as the details have long suggested Microsoft benefited greatly from unauthorized copying of its software in China, by building tremendous lock-in and making Microsoft the defacto standard. Of course, when a Microsoft exec recently announced that "piracy" was no longer a threat who knew he meant because Microsoft had decided to go in the other direction and use it to its own advantage?

Of course, I'm joking there. Microsoft continues to insist that piracy is a huge problem, and over in India, Dan alerts us that Microsoft has actually been fined for harassing "pirates" by trying to take them to court in the national capitol, instead of where the "piracy" actually happened:
According to the Court, Microsoft is needlessly abusing its unlimited cash flow as a power tool to financially hurt the defendants, who will have to travel all across the country in order to defend themselves. This abuse of "money power" to "harass" defendants is unacceptable according to the Court.

"When the constitution of India provides equality before law, this equality has to be all pervasive and cannot be allowed to be diluted because of money power or lobbying power," Judge Dhingra commented on the case.
So, it's fine to try to bankrupt "pirates" as you're pirating software yourself? Of course, Microsoft will squirm out of this one just fine. It'll claim it was a mistake, probably throw some money at Plurk (who just got a ton of free PR) and move on, still claiming that "piracy" is bad, bad, bad and must be stopped (especially in China).


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    compgeek, Dec 15th, 2009 @ 1:42pm

    tsk tsk tsk

    funny how piracy is only a problem for software/movie/music companies when other people besides the whining companies doing it

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    aguywhoneedstenbucks (profile), Dec 15th, 2009 @ 1:47pm

    Vendor

    Actually they're claiming it was a vendor that did it. As little faith as I usually have I actually believe this entirely.

    http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/12/15/microsoft-gives-final-answer-on-plurk-disaster-it- wasnt-us/

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Tom D. Harry, Dec 15th, 2009 @ 1:53pm

    jeeze

    I find it more funny that so many are causing such a furor over this as though it were an official certified "Microsoft Corporation Sanctioned Plan of Action."

    It's a bit of copied code in a country and culture where copying is a way of life, especially business life, and almost certainly no more than a handful of employees was aware of it. Hold Microsoft to a fair standard as the act and react to this revelation, but blame the employees and the culture for the act.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 15th, 2009 @ 2:28pm

    Microsoft supposedly has copied Linux code (I believe it was TCP/IP code). While we don't have the source code it was said that the allegedly copied code behaved exactly like the linux code, bug for bug, and the stack looked identical even. I believe it was allegedly windows 2000 that copied the code.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 15th, 2009 @ 2:29pm

    Re: jeeze

    No, I hold Microsoft responsible because they should take responsibility for who they hire and for ensuring they don't steal code from others.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 15th, 2009 @ 2:32pm

    Re:

    Actually it was supposedly BSD code that Microsoft stole. My mistake.

    "Unlike Microsoft, who stole BSD code and then used it in Windows NT's TCP/IP stack"

    http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-1222045.html

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 15th, 2009 @ 2:34pm

    Re: jeeze

    and this is one of the problems with our society. If an individual or small business does infringes then sue the individual out of a house and home. If the rich and the powerful do it behind the protection of a corporation then it's perfectly OK, there is no one to blame and certainly the rich people in control of the corporation who are responsible are not to blame. They can just pass blame off to someone else. In the end only the rich benefit, they can break laws and hide behind corporate protection.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    jackie lee, Dec 15th, 2009 @ 2:38pm

    theft of copyrights

    we should also look at the movie studios who take other
    people work and infringe. one such studio is sony.
    I notice there are a lot of sony lawsuits for infringement.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    NullOp, Dec 15th, 2009 @ 2:49pm

    Abuse

    Microsoft abusing the little guy.....now why is that news again?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    icon
    senshikaze (profile), Dec 15th, 2009 @ 2:58pm

    Re: Re:

    well, the bsd tcp/ip stack is more than likely under the bsd license, which, unlike the gpl, gives everyone full right to the code, so can be used in all programs, open source or not.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    ., Dec 15th, 2009 @ 3:23pm

    Punishment.

    Ok so punishment is hard, but it should be equal to all parts and just and in that spirit I think financial punishment should be a percentage of the income of people or companies.

    :)

    By the way, why is that courts still don't use video conferencing?

    That way a lawsuit could be filled anywhere and people should just go to the nearest court of law. Sure the government can afford broadband no?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    ., Dec 15th, 2009 @ 3:27pm

    Microsoft borough a lot

    The EXE file is the unix bin file with some modifications to it.

    and there are many other instances but I wouldn't worry about that.

    Actually open source is great counter to software monopolies.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Simple Mind, Dec 15th, 2009 @ 3:27pm

    it is unusual for me to defend MS

    I am all for frying Microsoft when they deserve it. You can perhaps blame them for a poor reaction to this incident, but I wouldn't blame them for the incident happening (once). It is probably one developer that did this, and that developer is probably Chinese. If you recall, the same thing happened to Google a couple of years back. I was working at Google when it happened, and it was something they just weren't expecting or looking for. After it happened they fired the guy and made it clear (to the Chinese development) that this just wasn't acceptable practice and put in checks to make sure it didn't happen again.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    TSO, Dec 15th, 2009 @ 3:38pm

    > Microsoft has, in the past, been at the forefront of complaining about "piracy" in China

    Who could have seen that they've been, in fact, complaining about *their very own* piracy!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 15th, 2009 @ 3:49pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    But not for commercial purposes, and if Microsoft did steal it they used it for commercial purposes. That's the point.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 15th, 2009 @ 3:54pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    Well, it actually depends on which BSD license was used. However, the point is that I doubt that Microsoft actually followed the terms of the BSD license, and it does have some terms that they must follow.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 15th, 2009 @ 4:54pm

    Re: Re: jeeze

    Funny, that's just what they've done. The blame lies with those who copied the code and Microsoft is acting to make it right.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    identicon
    Bjorn, Dec 15th, 2009 @ 5:31pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    I guess google doesn't work on your internet. Try e.g. this article: http://www.kuro5hin.org/?op=displaystory;sid=2001/6/19/05641/7357

    So, yes, MS has used BSD code in it's tcp/ip stack, and followed the license completely. Even in my Windows 7 64bit ftp.exe, I find

    Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of
    California.n All rights reserved.nx00

    which satisfies the BSD attribution clause.

    There are enough real reasons to chastise MS, spreading lies about something they did right just shows intellectual laziness.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    identicon
    Bjorn, Dec 15th, 2009 @ 5:41pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Neither the GPL, nor the BSD, limits use to only include non-commercial uses. Stop spreading FUD. In particular you (and MS) are entitled to use source licensed under the BSD in any way you see fit as long as you don't violate any of the specifically mentioned conditions of the license (see e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This