Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, Nov 10th, 2009 @ 12:52am

  
  

  They just needed more time to choose which information was appropriate to release and which information was not. That way they can release only the info that won't upset the public while hiding the info that the public would be upset about and rightfully should know about.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  John Doe, Nov 10th, 2009 @ 4:13am

  
  

  Re:

  Exactly like their release of the visitor list to the White House. Names will be removed for "national security" reasons. So the list being released is as good as no list because it has been edited. So much for a transparent administration.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  deadzone (profile), Nov 10th, 2009 @ 6:07am

  
  

  Who really knows at this point. They could release several sheets with nothing but "Redacted" on them.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Overcast (profile), Nov 10th, 2009 @ 6:27am

  
  

  Amazing... the White House is actually sharing something with the public?

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Dark Helmet (profile), Nov 10th, 2009 @ 6:37am

  
  

  Re:

  "Amazing... the White House is actually sharing something with the public?"
  
  Wait until you see the lists. This should be funny...

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Captain Obvious, Nov 10th, 2009 @ 8:27am

  
  

  Someone should just hack into their computer systems and get the complete, unaltered list and post it online everywhere.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

Add Your Comment