Arizona Court Says Metadata On Public Records Is Public As Well

from the lobbyists-rushing-to-scrub-metadata dept

An interesting ruling in the Arizona Supreme Court found that the metadata on a public record should be public as well -- so people could, conceivably, look at who created certain documents and when they were created. While that might not seem like a big deal, as the article link above describes, plenty of interesting data often can be found in the metadata -- such as what lobbyist wrote up what documents for other organizations to send. While this only applies in Arizona right now, you have to imagine that lobbyists are quickly learning how to better scrub metadata off their astroturfing letters.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro, Oct 30th, 2009 @ 4:06pm

    People whose idea of a sentence with �metadata� is...

    “I never metadata I didn’t like”.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro, Oct 30th, 2009 @ 4:25pm

    As on metadata I did meditate ...

    ... I met a date whom May did hate, as my Mediterranean mate.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    icon
    Fred McTaker (profile), Oct 30th, 2009 @ 6:40pm

    Falsification?

    Does this carry any explicit or implicit penalty for metadata falsification or spoofing? A recent case showed that astroturfing lobbyists even used false letterhead in faxes, to send letters to congress members as other "grassroots" organizations, to fraudulently attribute "grassroots" support to their own messages. Most Spam exists by falsified header data, so I'm pretty sure lobbyists know how to falsify data. I want to make sure they can be punished for it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 31st, 2009 @ 7:28am

    simple solution

    use vi

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 31st, 2009 @ 2:22pm

    Here's a problem with all this: What happened to the concept of private communications?

    Will freedom of speech be lost if people's personal opinions expressed to representatives or to government agencies becomes public record? Where does it stop? Would my request for a clarification on my properties taxes become public record?

    I think the court sort of missed the boat on this one.

    On the plus side, you got to use Metadata in a headline. SEO score!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This