Security companies love using stats to make something appear to be a bigger problem than it really is. Take for example this claim that links to malware are "abundant" on Twitter. The problem is that this is totally meaningless. Because you only see the tweets of people you follow, if spammers are putting up malware links, it only matters if anyone's following them and then clicking on the links. The number of links that point to malware alone is meaningless, because one "spammer" could just post a ton of malware links, but that won't mean a thing if no one is following them. The real question should be how often are people getting malware because of clicks on Twitter. Unfortunately, that data isn't provided.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- NSA Has A 50,000 Computer Botnet From Secretly Installing Malware Around The Globe
- Sports Journalist Gets Trolled On Twitter, Tattles To Troll's Parents
- GCHQ Used Fake Slashdot Page To Install Malware To Hack Internet Exchange
- North Korean Megaweapon: Malware In Games, Porn
- Sports Radio Blowhard Blowhards After Parody Twitter Account