Study: More Gov't Funding Of The Press, Less Political Corruption Reporting

from the questions-abound-however dept

There's been some talk of having the government bail out newspapers or somehow fundamentally support newspapers. Of course, for good reason, that scares a lot of people who believe that news organizations (not just newspapers, mind you) play an important role in acting as a government corruption watchdog. So it's interesting to see a new study that found that the more government support the press gets, the less they covered government scandals. Of course, this is a correlation -- so it's entirely possible that governments that support the press are simply less corrupt and less prone to scandal. However, the study did look at the timing of gov't funding as compared to press coverage which suggests that there might be a causal relationship, as the lower incidence of press coverage for gov't scandals tended to lag funding slightly. There are still some questions, but this certainly suggests that if you believe news organizations are important in holding government accountable, pushing for gov't support may not be a good idea.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2009 @ 7:57pm

    post hoc ergo propter hoc?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Jake, Oct 27th, 2009 @ 8:45pm

    Quick point of clarification: The case study cited in the link is talking about buying advertising space in the media, rather than explicitly tax-funded media outlets like NPR or the BBC. The author of the blog post emphasises that in the third comment.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    icon
    Pwdrskir (profile), Oct 27th, 2009 @ 9:32pm

    Bad idea

    “…to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” would take on a whole new meaning. Companies would lobby congress to suppress stories related to their company. Can you imagine the increase in lobbying this would bring.

    Congressional representatives would hold the power of the purse over news organizations which is a built in “check” mechanism for congress to hold those receiving funds accountable. Checkmate.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    question, Oct 28th, 2009 @ 4:57am

    Re:

    What percentage, exactly, does NPR recieve from taxes?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    icon
    Sean T Henry (profile), Oct 28th, 2009 @ 7:28am

    Re: Bad idea

    "Companies would lobby congress to suppress stories related to their company. Can you imagine the increase in lobbying this would bring."

    At least their time and money would be well waisted, there are worse things they could be lobbying for/against. Also if they would do that to suppress stories in that way the main stream media will suffer and internet based news will more easily push to the forefront.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 28th, 2009 @ 10:11am

    Re: Re: Bad idea

    At least their time and money would be well waisted,

    Yeah, because everyone knows that members of Congress ignore lobbyists, huh?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Nov 15th, 2009 @ 8:58am

    penis

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    Jerry, Dec 30th, 2013 @ 7:35am

    Re: Re: Re: Bad idea

    "waisted"

    Obv. bot; do not feed.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Jerry, Dec 30th, 2013 @ 7:57am

    Re:

    Exactly. And not only do they speak Spanish in Argentina, but it's in the southern Hemisphere ~

    And, the BBC.

    And, not only have the broadcast companies always gotten their frequencies nearly free, but now the FCC doesn't even enforce the requirement that they provide a public service or be of general benefit to the people. No, do not conceptualize print independent of broadcast; it has not been for nearly 100 years. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Book_(FCC)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This