RIAA: We Support Net Neutrality, Just As Long As It Includes The Ability For ISPs To Block File Sharing

from the so-that's-how-it-works? dept

Because I know how much you've all been wanting to know what a bunch of dying record labels and their chief lobbyist thinks about net neutrality, the RIAA's president Cary Sherman put out a statement saying that they're happy with the new rules because the FCC's Julius Genachowski has said it's okay for ISPs to ignore all those rules as long as they're going after "illegal conduct" online -- which of course the RIAA assumes must mean file sharing.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2009 @ 6:05am

    Wow so how are they gonna difrentiate betwene ubuntu iso and James brown? Both are "file sharing"?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    chris (profile), Oct 27th, 2009 @ 6:06am

    Re:

    all file sharing supports terrorism.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Johnny Lilburne, Oct 27th, 2009 @ 6:13am

    Repeat after me...

    Home killing tapes music.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2009 @ 6:18am

    I can dream, can't I?

    What would happen if a non-profit alternative to Comcast and Verizon entered the market?

    ... maybe one who took a stand against the antiquated policies of exploiting a monopolistic choke hold on internet access.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2009 @ 6:20am

    Fawk the RIAA, I could care less! They are dead to me, as well as any musician under their radar!


    Listen up musicians!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Yogi, Oct 27th, 2009 @ 6:24am

    Ubuntu

    is synonymous with terrorism - it is stealing money from Microsoft and Apple , isn't it?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    icon
    Rabbit80 (profile), Oct 27th, 2009 @ 6:26am

    How is it possible to determine what is "illegal" content being downloaded without invading peoples privacy and monitoring everything?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    icon
    Dark Helmet (profile), Oct 27th, 2009 @ 6:40am

    Re: Re:

    "all file sharing supports terrorism."

    Chris, we've been over this before. File sharing does NOT support terrorism. That is a ridiculous claim, stupid on a level that is out of control.

    Raporism on the other hand...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    icon
    minijedimaster (profile), Oct 27th, 2009 @ 7:01am

    Re:

    How is it possible to determine what is "illegal" content being downloaded without invading peoples privacy and monitoring everything?

    Thus negating ANY net neutrality they were supposed to have in the first place. Good question.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    icon
    Free Capitalist (profile), Oct 27th, 2009 @ 7:04am

    Re: Re:

    If you had nothing to hide you could haz your neuter-ality.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    icon
    Designerfx (profile), Oct 27th, 2009 @ 7:08am

    Re:

    oh it gets better. Who decides what is "illegal" or not? Oh right, back to DMCA claim equivalents. "filesharing could be illegal, it must be blocked". "web browsing could be illegal, it could be blocked".


    I also don't get that police approval/requirement thing.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2009 @ 7:28am

    Re: Rabbit80

    Do you really the RIAA cares about your privacy?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    klink, Oct 27th, 2009 @ 7:28am

    Re: I can dream, can't I?

    the oligarchy would never allow any competition to its monopoly on media transmission, however; a community in one of the carolinas, being fed up w/ high internet and cable prices, started a nonprofit to provide those services as well as VOIP phone to thieir community. they were successful in lowering the costs of these services to their community. i wonder what ever became of that experiment. homeland security and the NSA would view this as the thorn from hell in their sides. if your are interested in helping me research this subject, please e-mail me w/ subject-mediastruggle.

    P.S keep in mind all electronic communications are monitered for key words.

    klink

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    McBeese, Oct 27th, 2009 @ 7:33am

    Encrypted P2P VPN

    It's only a matter of time before encrypted P2P VPN links become commonplace in the consumer market, just as they are already in the business world. When that happens, the ISPs will no longer be able to see what their data pipes are being used for.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    icon
    rebrad (profile), Oct 27th, 2009 @ 7:36am

    "We Support Net Neutrality, Just As Long As It Includes The Ability For ISPs To Block File Sharing"

    Hmm, then it wouldn't be neutral would it and if they can block activity that may or may not be illegal, what else can they block without proof? Can they block "government defined" inappropriate speech, ideas or writing they don't like. Tyrants have no qualms manipulating labels and language to cover it's abhorrent and repressive behavior.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    icon
    rebrad (profile), Oct 27th, 2009 @ 7:37am

    Net Neutrality/Not

    "We Support Net Neutrality, Just As Long As It Includes The Ability For ISPs To Block File Sharing"

    Hmm, then it wouldn't be neutral would it and if they can block activity that may or may not be illegal, what else can they block without proof? Can they block "government defined" inappropriate speech, ideas or writing they don't like. Tyrants have no qualms manipulating labels and language to cover it's abhorrent and repressive behavior.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2009 @ 8:03am

    Re: Re:

    also hurts corn farmers

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    identicon
    PlanB, Oct 27th, 2009 @ 8:18am

    HR3458 - Net Neutrality

    This is nothing more than big government's attempt to put their hands in the cookie jar of a free market internet. Look for the process of any future internet technologies bog down due to oversized government intrusion. More government = less freedom.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2009 @ 8:57am

    ignore the d*mn troll

    if you all can't see the intent of that comment, then
    you must have been raised under a certain bridge.


    let's have you and he go outside and fight!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    icon
    chris (profile), Oct 27th, 2009 @ 9:10am

    Re: Re: Re:

    Chris, we've been over this before. File sharing does NOT support terrorism. That is a ridiculous claim, stupid on a level that is out of control.

    not recognizing sarcasm supports terrorism. it's also racist.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    icon
    chris (profile), Oct 27th, 2009 @ 9:12am

    Re: Repeat after me...

    killing music homes tape.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    icon
    chris (profile), Oct 27th, 2009 @ 9:15am

    Re: Ubuntu

    is synonymous with terrorism - it is stealing money from Microsoft and Apple , isn't it?

    unbuntu is arabic for "death to america".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    identicon
    Nathan, Oct 27th, 2009 @ 9:17am

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Epic win, Chris!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24.  
    icon
    Free Capitalist (profile), Oct 27th, 2009 @ 9:30am

    Re: ignore the d*mn troll

    You are hereby accused and convicted of Raporism (C&TM 2009 Dark Helmet), failure to heed your own subject-line and failure to submit to bitter, bitter sardony. Your rights to neuter-ality have been revoked pending review by your RIAA appointed judicial and conciliator panel.

    Also, I accept your proposed schoolyard match. (sorry Jedi, nothing against you, we have to make an example of these Raporists)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  25.  
    icon
    Dark Helmet (profile), Oct 27th, 2009 @ 9:46am

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    "not recognizing sarcasm supports terrorism. it's also racist."

    Not to mention it also kicks puppies, beats Rihanna's, and gives bailout money to AIG execs.

    ...you know, as long as we're hitting all the "he's a bad guy" buzzwords.

    Why oh why have I not uploaded the term "raporism" to the urban dictionary yet?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  26.  
    icon
    Dark Helmet (profile), Oct 27th, 2009 @ 10:16am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    ....aaaaand done, pending approval..

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  27.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2009 @ 11:28am

    Net Neutrality has as little to do with neutrality as social/environmental justice have to do with justice. It's just the way liberals use antonyms to describe all their plans. They want to silence opposition, they try to pass laws with names like fairness doctrine, net neutrality, hate crimes bill, diversity rules.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  28.  
    icon
    Daemon_ZOGG (profile), Oct 27th, 2009 @ 11:36am

    RIAA Statements... and Bin Laden

    Every time the RIAA Mafia Group Inc issues a statement, it's starting to sound more and more like those osama bin laden terror videos. }:>

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  29.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2009 @ 2:23pm

    Re:

    Is that like how the "Internet Freedom" bill does the exact opposite?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  30.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2009 @ 3:06pm

    Re: Re: Ubuntu

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  31.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2009 @ 3:29pm

    Re:

    Ah, I see, so it's actually those liberals' fault now!

    Partisan commentators...what would we ever do without you.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  32.  
    identicon
    The Idiot, Oct 28th, 2009 @ 1:55am

    Here's a fun analogy:

    If you support the RIAA, you're a terrorist. You force people to pay for illegal content, and share 'their' files. This is regardless of what it actually is you download. I actually received a nastygram for obtaining NIN's The Slip from Mininova.

    They are spreading the terror around.,because they've lost control of the market.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  33.  
    icon
    chris (profile), Oct 28th, 2009 @ 9:17am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    that's socialist.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This