Politics

Politics

by Mike Masnick


Filed Under:
net neutrality

Companies:
riaa



RIAA: We Support Net Neutrality, Just As Long As It Includes The Ability For ISPs To Block File Sharing

from the so-that's-how-it-works? dept

Because I know how much you've all been wanting to know what a bunch of dying record labels and their chief lobbyist thinks about net neutrality, the RIAA's president Cary Sherman put out a statement saying that they're happy with the new rules because the FCC's Julius Genachowski has said it's okay for ISPs to ignore all those rules as long as they're going after "illegal conduct" online -- which of course the RIAA assumes must mean file sharing.

33 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 6:05am
    by Anonymous Coward

    Wow so how are they gonna difrentiate betwene ubuntu iso and James brown? Both are "file sharing"?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  2. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 6:06am

    Re:

    by icon chris (profile)

    all file sharing supports terrorism.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  3. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 6:13am

    Repeat after me...

    Home killing tapes music.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  4. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 6:18am

    I can dream, can't I?

    by Anonymous Coward

    What would happen if a non-profit alternative to Comcast and Verizon entered the market?

    ... maybe one who took a stand against the antiquated policies of exploiting a monopolistic choke hold on internet access.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  5. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 6:20am
    by Anonymous Coward

    Fawk the RIAA, I could care less! They are dead to me, as well as any musician under their radar!


    Listen up musicians!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  6. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 6:24am

    Ubuntu

    by Yogi

    is synonymous with terrorism - it is stealing money from Microsoft and Apple , isn't it?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  7. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 6:26am
    by icon Rabbit80 (profile)

    How is it possible to determine what is "illegal" content being downloaded without invading peoples privacy and monitoring everything?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  8. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 6:40am

    Re: Re:

    by icon Dark Helmet (profile)

    "all file sharing supports terrorism."

    Chris, we've been over this before. File sharing does NOT support terrorism. That is a ridiculous claim, stupid on a level that is out of control.

    Raporism on the other hand...

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  9. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 7:01am

    Re:

    by icon minijedimaster (profile)

    How is it possible to determine what is "illegal" content being downloaded without invading peoples privacy and monitoring everything?

    Thus negating ANY net neutrality they were supposed to have in the first place. Good question.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  10. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 7:04am

    Re: Re:

    by icon Free Capitalist (profile)

    If you had nothing to hide you could haz your neuter-ality.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  11. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 7:08am

    Re:

    by icon Designerfx (profile)

    oh it gets better. Who decides what is "illegal" or not? Oh right, back to DMCA claim equivalents. "filesharing could be illegal, it must be blocked". "web browsing could be illegal, it could be blocked".


    I also don't get that police approval/requirement thing.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  12. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 7:28am

    Re: Rabbit80

    by Anonymous Coward

    Do you really the RIAA cares about your privacy?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  13. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 7:28am

    Re: I can dream, can't I?

    by klink

    the oligarchy would never allow any competition to its monopoly on media transmission, however; a community in one of the carolinas, being fed up w/ high internet and cable prices, started a nonprofit to provide those services as well as VOIP phone to thieir community. they were successful in lowering the costs of these services to their community. i wonder what ever became of that experiment. homeland security and the NSA would view this as the thorn from hell in their sides. if your are interested in helping me research this subject, please e-mail me w/ subject-mediastruggle.

    P.S keep in mind all electronic communications are monitered for key words.

    klink

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  14. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 7:33am

    Encrypted P2P VPN

    by McBeese

    It's only a matter of time before encrypted P2P VPN links become commonplace in the consumer market, just as they are already in the business world. When that happens, the ISPs will no longer be able to see what their data pipes are being used for.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  15. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 7:36am
    by icon rebrad (profile)

    "We Support Net Neutrality, Just As Long As It Includes The Ability For ISPs To Block File Sharing"

    Hmm, then it wouldn't be neutral would it and if they can block activity that may or may not be illegal, what else can they block without proof? Can they block "government defined" inappropriate speech, ideas or writing they don't like. Tyrants have no qualms manipulating labels and language to cover it's abhorrent and repressive behavior.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  16. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 7:37am

    Net Neutrality/Not

    by icon rebrad (profile)

    "We Support Net Neutrality, Just As Long As It Includes The Ability For ISPs To Block File Sharing"

    Hmm, then it wouldn't be neutral would it and if they can block activity that may or may not be illegal, what else can they block without proof? Can they block "government defined" inappropriate speech, ideas or writing they don't like. Tyrants have no qualms manipulating labels and language to cover it's abhorrent and repressive behavior.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  17. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 8:03am

    Re: Re:

    by Anonymous Coward

    also hurts corn farmers

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  18. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 8:18am

    HR3458 - Net Neutrality

    by PlanB

    This is nothing more than big government's attempt to put their hands in the cookie jar of a free market internet. Look for the process of any future internet technologies bog down due to oversized government intrusion. More government = less freedom.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  19. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 8:57am

    ignore the d*mn troll

    by Anonymous Coward

    if you all can't see the intent of that comment, then
    you must have been raised under a certain bridge.


    let's have you and he go outside and fight!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  20. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 9:10am

    Re: Re: Re:

    by icon chris (profile)

    Chris, we've been over this before. File sharing does NOT support terrorism. That is a ridiculous claim, stupid on a level that is out of control.

    not recognizing sarcasm supports terrorism. it's also racist.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  21. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 9:12am

    Re: Repeat after me...

    by icon chris (profile)

    killing music homes tape.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  22. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 9:15am

    Re: Ubuntu

    by icon chris (profile)

    is synonymous with terrorism - it is stealing money from Microsoft and Apple , isn't it?

    unbuntu is arabic for "death to america".

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  23. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 9:17am

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    by Nathan

    Epic win, Chris!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  24. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 9:30am

    Re: ignore the d*mn troll

    by icon Free Capitalist (profile)

    You are hereby accused and convicted of Raporism (C&TM 2009 Dark Helmet), failure to heed your own subject-line and failure to submit to bitter, bitter sardony. Your rights to neuter-ality have been revoked pending review by your RIAA appointed judicial and conciliator panel.

    Also, I accept your proposed schoolyard match. (sorry Jedi, nothing against you, we have to make an example of these Raporists)

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  25. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 9:46am

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    by icon Dark Helmet (profile)

    "not recognizing sarcasm supports terrorism. it's also racist."

    Not to mention it also kicks puppies, beats Rihanna's, and gives bailout money to AIG execs.

    ...you know, as long as we're hitting all the "he's a bad guy" buzzwords.

    Why oh why have I not uploaded the term "raporism" to the urban dictionary yet?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  26. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 10:16am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    by icon Dark Helmet (profile)

    ....aaaaand done, pending approval..

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  27. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 11:28am
    by Anonymous Coward

    Net Neutrality has as little to do with neutrality as social/environmental justice have to do with justice. It's just the way liberals use antonyms to describe all their plans. They want to silence opposition, they try to pass laws with names like fairness doctrine, net neutrality, hate crimes bill, diversity rules.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  28. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 11:36am

    RIAA Statements... and Bin Laden

    by Daemon_ZOGG

    Every time the RIAA Mafia Group Inc issues a statement, it's starting to sound more and more like those osama bin laden terror videos. }:>

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  29. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 2:23pm

    Re:

    by Anonymous Coward

    Is that like how the "Internet Freedom" bill does the exact opposite?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  30. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 3:06pm

    Re: Re: Ubuntu

    by Anonymous Coward

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXqnUOehDiM

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  31. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 3:29pm

    Re:

    by Anonymous Coward

    Ah, I see, so it's actually those liberals' fault now!

    Partisan commentators...what would we ever do without you.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  32. Oct 28th, 2009 @ 1:55am
    by The Idiot

    Here's a fun analogy:

    If you support the RIAA, you're a terrorist. You force people to pay for illegal content, and share 'their' files. This is regardless of what it actually is you download. I actually received a nastygram for obtaining NIN's The Slip from Mininova.

    They are spreading the terror around.,because they've lost control of the market.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  33. Oct 28th, 2009 @ 9:17am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    by icon chris (profile)

    that's socialist.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It