Studies

Studies

by Mike Masnick


Filed Under:
social networking

Companies:
gartner



Gartner Finally Realizes That Social Networking At Work Isn't Evil

from the could-have-found-that-elsewwhere-earlier... dept

It wasn't that long ago that Gartner was spreading FUD about the use of social networking tools at work, saying it didn't think the technology would be beneficial within corporations. It seems that Gartner has a new tune. Just a week or so after we pointed out how silly it was to block social networks at work, Gartner has come out and said the same thing, pointing out that such blocks don't really work, and most people now use such tools for important forms of communication, which would be harmed by IT decisions to cut them off. Of course, some of us have been saying that for years. Good thing companies are paying billions to Gartner for its advice, right?

12 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments

(Flattened / Threaded)

    Oct 19th, 2009 @ 6:57pm
  • Talk until you a blue in the face...

    by Freedom

    Sometimes a message won't be heard because it just isn't the right time for it.

    It is only now that businesses are using Facebook and such that the social networking value is seen to both the business mgt/owners and IT departments.

    Until you have major companies invested in a meaningful way, you weren't going to get any traction on the argument of not blocking what appears to be the new water cooler to management. Now that it is seen as the new Golf Course or pick your analogy, it is A-OK with management but they need a study to justify it :)!

    Freedom

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Oct 19th, 2009 @ 7:37pm
  • by Cheezeburger

    Gartner says whatever they are paid to say

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Oct 19th, 2009 @ 8:40pm
  • Gartner?

    Who is this Gartner?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Oct 19th, 2009 @ 10:49pm
  • by Doctor Strange

    Good thing companies are paying billions to Gartner for its advice, right?

    Someone's a little jealous...

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Oct 20th, 2009 @ 6:39am
  • Some companies embrace these sites

    by Andrew

    Our company has a presence on Facebook, Twitter, Linkedin and a few other sites, and actively encourages employees to participate. So not everyone just thinks of them as time wasters.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Oct 20th, 2009 @ 7:36am
  • "Best Practice" != Best Solution

    by icon Free Capitalist (profile)

    There are still plenty of private networks that I would not recommend opening up to social networking. High security environments with a broad authorized user base should still avoid non-critical "targeted services" such as Facebook to protect themselves from the gullible majority.

    If it were easier to fire people for under-performing, I would say sure, open up the services wherever there isn't a security policy in place that would dictate otherwise. For mid to large size corporations, they probably need to decide whether or not to open to social networking based on their employees' use patterns and experiences.

    Social networking is good, but its also a form of crack for some people, who create burden for their teammates. Work ethic should always come before being socially connected, and for many in the workforce this is unfortunately not the case.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Oct 20th, 2009 @ 9:47am
  • The fine line....

    by icon Overtkill (profile)

    Being a Systems Admin myself, I would argue that there is a fine line between justifying use of sites like FaceBook while at work. Companies will still have to shovel out cast to make sure their employees are not spending many hours a day on social network sites.

    I would argue that this is definitely one of those situations where there is a fine line between wasting time at work, and helping the company by contributing the the common good. Not many people understand that when they pass through the corporate proxy gateway, they are logged to the teeth. These logs in the hands of a good admin can be broken down in seconds to find out what employees are actually doing online.

    I once held the Sysadmin gig along with a management job (multitasking) for a small business before venturing out on my own. I was actually quite lenient in that I allowed people to do what they generally wanted, provided that their work was done in a timely manner. But there were those who simply couldn't help themselves. What cracked me up most, was watching the light above "offender's" cubicle change with a couple of mouse clicks as someone walked in that direction, only to change back after the person walked on by.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Oct 20th, 2009 @ 12:36pm
  • by icon jdub (profile)

    People will always find away around things. People/governments/corporations will always try to block the consumer on not doing something, and the consumer WILL always find away around.

    Anyone who believes they can stop everyone from doing something is sorely misinformed.

    examples:

    1. The U.S. War on Drugs (That worked out well eh)
    2. Newspapers putting up pay walls (Still waiting to see if that will work out, my bets on people flocking to the free alternatives)
    3. Movies/music concerning file sharing (**AA still haven't stopped that one from happening, and doesn't appear to be dropping anytime soon)

    This blocking social networks on company networks is just another dead end. How to get around it? People are just using there smart phones now, to browse, and do whatever they like. So it really hasn't stopped anything.

    Hell I even don't even use ITunes for my ipod, cause I refuse to be locked down to it, and want to be able to transfer my files, back and forth to any computer I choose.

    What is it they say in Hackers: "You may stop me, but you can't stop us all!"

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML
Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It