Olympics Tries To Block Olympian Newspaper (From Olympia, Washington) From Trademarking Its Name

from the and-the-gold-medal-in-trademark-pushyness-goes-to... dept

It's no secret that the Olympics can be ridiculously over aggressive with trademark claims, often getting governments to pass special intellectual property rules to allow the Olympics special control over certain names or phrases well outside the contours of existing intellectual property law. The various Olympic committees insist they "need" this to protect their revenue stream, but we didn't realize that gov'ts had any responsibility in helping the Olympics make lots of money. The latest move is that the US Olympic Committee is protesting a trademark application for the name of The Olympian, a newspaper in Olympia, Washington (thanks to Erik for sending that in). It would appear that the Olympian has been operating since 1889. That would be seven years prior to the first modern "Olympics" in 1896.

While I am left wondering why the Olympian suddenly decided to try to register the trademark on its name now (leading to the attempt to block the trademark), it does seem pretty ridiculous that the Olympics could suddenly claim that there might be confusion between the two after over a century of the two "brands" living together peacefully.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    icon
    ChurchHatesTucker (profile), Oct 8th, 2009 @ 8:12am

    You ask a question, then answer it

    "While I am left wondering why the Olympian suddenly decided to try to register the trademark on its name now (leading to the attempt to block the trademark)"

    Obviously the first part was predicated on the IOC's tendency to do the second. Better to get their claim established before the IOC starts printing a paper or somesuch.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Josh in CharlotteNC (profile), Oct 8th, 2009 @ 10:23am

      Re: You ask a question, then answer it

      My guess would be some IP lawyer needed some billable hours, with full knowledge of IOC/USOC litigiousness, told them, "Hey, I noticed you don't have a trademark on your name. You gotta get this for (long list of bogus reasons). I can do this for you quick and cheap, and in the very unlikely event someone challenges it, we can discuss additional payment."

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Free Capitalist (profile), Oct 8th, 2009 @ 8:25am

    Bad week for the USOC.

    This week's printed SI basically blames the non-cooperative nature at the USOC for Chicago getting virtually ignored at the IOC vote. Where did I get my hands on a printed SI? I'll never tell.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Ryan, Oct 8th, 2009 @ 9:09am

      Re:

      I've heard so much about this issue, but nowhere have I read why everybody in the U.S. is so shocked that Chicago didn't win(or got last). Seems to me that Madrid or Rio De Janeiro or whatever the other candidate was are equally appealing locations, if not more so.

      The U.S. has already hosted many times and been turned down many times. This would be the first event ever for South America. Additionally, Chicago is certainly no paradise and Obama's speech, like every speech of his, was all style and no substance. What made everybody think that Chicago was going to win, or even should have won?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Dark Helmet (profile), Oct 8th, 2009 @ 8:29am

    Stupid Olympics

    Don't get me started on those Jackasses right now. Chicago the least deserving bid? Please...

    On topic: Does the olympics present challenges with national laws because of their inherent multi-national-ness? Or are these laws and trademark issues actually handled by the local IOCs, like the USOC for instance? If it's the USOC, then why should they play by any rules other than their country's?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 8th, 2009 @ 9:10am

    Mount Olympus is next

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 8th, 2009 @ 9:10am

    HBR

    The HBR recently discussed why Olympic Sponsorship isn't effective with a quote to supplement your analysis:

    "the Olympics does its sponsors a disservice if it encourages them to think that legal enforcement is all that's required for a rewarding sponsorship experience."

    Taken from:
    http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/cs/2009/10/olympic_sponsorships.html

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Douglas (profile), Oct 8th, 2009 @ 9:25am

    Olympics

    Here in Washington State, we couldn't bid on hosting the Olympics because we have an Olympic Mountain Range that would have to be renamed!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      btr1701 (profile), Oct 8th, 2009 @ 11:59am

      Re: Olympics

      > Here in Washington State, we couldn't bid on
      > hosting the Olympics because we have an
      > Olympic Mountain Range that would have to
      > be renamed!

      Wouldn't be a problem. Read the linked article and you'll find that Congress specifically exempted uses of "Olympic" in Washington State from USOC jurisdiction for just that reason. Given that the law itself allows businesses in that area to use that name, I have no idea why the USOC thinks it will be successful in challenging the newspaper's trademark application.


      But McClatchy attorneys point out that
      the amendment also includes a provision
      that recognizes Washington state's claim
      to the Olympic name. This exception covers
      naturally occurring mountains or the
      geographic region named prior to Feb. 6,
      1998, and where "such businesses, goods,
      or services are operated, sold, and marketed
      in the State of Washington west of the
      Cascade Mountain range and operations,
      sales, and marketing outside of this area
      are not substantial."

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      elana bogff, Feb 21st, 2010 @ 3:43pm

      Re: Olympics

      ryfgyfddfghgguy hfghjfghjfghfdhdfhfghh jhgfbhfgbhgfhfvjhfhfhhbvjvbhjbgbvhvcfcbhfvfghfghjdfbjbjvffdbhjvfbvhjbbbvbhvfhbfgvhvdfbhdfhbfhfghdfff ghjfhjfgjhfghfgjhfghfgfhjfghjfg

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 8th, 2009 @ 9:32am

    Lets not get started on the Olympiad challenge that use to be on TV. Gasp, asking high school students questions on local TV must in some way steal money from the Olympics.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    william (profile), Oct 8th, 2009 @ 9:37am

    BAH! Olympics. It's coming to my town very soon and I don't like one bit on how it operates. I don't like how the City suddenly becomes the bitch for the Olympic committee or how they are kicking, pushing, shoving everyone around for protesting the coming of Olympic games or how the Canadian government have the bend over on command.

    In my town a long time running pizza store, exists well before the Olympic coming to town, was taken to court because it's called "Olympia". I think the case was eventually dropped though.

    You can ignore the fact that most city that hosted Olympics suffered after it's over. The whole Olympic thing is so commercialized that it's losing the spirit of the original games. I personally haven't cared or watched Olympics in like, 20 years.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Ed Woychowsky, Oct 8th, 2009 @ 9:42am

    Olympics

    Since the newspaper pre-dates the Olympics by seven years the name should belong to the newspaper. The Olympics has four possible choices:

    1 License the name.
    2 Change their name.
    3 Accept that Olympics is a historical name and therefore cannot belong to anyone.
    4 Continue their self destructive path.

    My bet is that they'll opt for number 4.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Darren, Oct 8th, 2009 @ 10:58am

    Vancouver Restaurant To Change Its Name

    http://www.998denman.com/

    How about the Olympia restaurant in Vancouver being forced to change it's name/sign during the Olympics? That place has been operating in the area for 15 years.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Palmyra (profile), Oct 8th, 2009 @ 11:32am

    There are others the IOC/USOC can go after

    The Olympia Brewing Company and its Olympia Beer. Wonder if the IOC/USOC wants to get into a barroom brawl?

    Then there is Olympia Snow Senator from Maine.

    How about the USS Olympia (SSN 717)Los Angeles class attack sub?

    And on and on....

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Dark Helmet (profile), Oct 8th, 2009 @ 11:59am

      Re: There are others the IOC/USOC can go after

      "The Olympia Brewing Company and its Olympia Beer. Wonder if the IOC/USOC wants to get into a barroom brawl?

      Then there is Olympia Snow Senator from Maine.

      How about the USS Olympia (SSN 717)Los Angeles class attack sub?"

      Well, I think those three should just enter into a Civ III style mutual protection pact. Then Senator Olympia Snow can drink a ton of Olympia Beer and issue an attack order from a USS Olympia L.A. Class attack sub upon IOC HQ.

      Ah, Civ III....

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Killer_Tofu (profile), Oct 8th, 2009 @ 11:43am

    Stupid Olympics

    I haven't cared much about the Olympics in awhile.
    The events themselves are insanely commercialize.
    Too much so.
    I just don't want them anymore.
    The only things I have watched, are some of our (our referring to USA, where I reside) insanely amazing athletes.

    These being Michael Phelps the swimmer and our female beach volleyball team Misty May-Treanor and Kerri Walsh.
    Truly amazing at what they do.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Chris Maresca (profile), Oct 8th, 2009 @ 1:05pm

    There's also an Olympian ...

    ... gas station chain (AFAIK).

    Seems pretty ridiculous and reminds of Nissan vs Nissan.

    Chris.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 8th, 2009 @ 1:12pm

    I guess next in line will be a lawsuit against the USG challenging the name "Olympic National Park" and "Olympic National Forest".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Dan, Oct 8th, 2009 @ 3:13pm

    I promise to not even look at the games or anything associated, including the advertising, ever. They can keep them all to themselves.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Jason, Oct 9th, 2009 @ 6:41am

    You should see the IP protection the Olympics get in Canada! Section 9 of the Trade-marks Act grants special "official" marks to certain entities. The rights granted by this section trump all other user rights, even if the user preceded the granting of the official mark! If The Olympian newspaper tried to register now in Canada, they would be SOL.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This