Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1.  

   

   Misanthropist (profile), Sep 29th, 2009 @ 5:47pm

   
   

   huh

   Gee, I wonder what lobbying group paid for this legislation.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2.  

   

   slackr (profile), Sep 29th, 2009 @ 6:22pm

   
   

   Update

   This was initially the case but the Government have realised the error of their ways. 3news.co.nz

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

3.  

   

   slackr (profile), Sep 29th, 2009 @ 6:23pm

   
   

   Re: Update

   actually there's an update link in the original article now too.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

4.  

   

   Mike Masnick (profile), Sep 29th, 2009 @ 6:39pm

   
   

   Re: Update

   Aha! Updated the post. Thanks!

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

5.  

   

   Anonymous Coward, Sep 29th, 2009 @ 6:51pm

   
   

   It's funny to see how in the US they would have never retracted the law. Nice to see a govt that actually listens to its people.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

6.  

   

   Anonymous Coward, Sep 29th, 2009 @ 7:18pm

   
   

   Re: Re: Update

   I'd say that the update would be worthy of it's own post.
   
   Sad as it may be, it's quite impressive when legislators can promptly respond to public outcry and fix unintended side effects of legislation.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

7.  

   

   zcat (profile), Sep 29th, 2009 @ 7:58pm

   
   

   Re:

   You wish.
   
   We had a referendum recently, following up on a fairly controversial change of law under the previous government. 54% of the electoral roll voted, 87.6% of those voted NO.
   
   You think they listened?
   
   http://www.voteno.org.nz/polls.htm

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

8.  

   

   Lawrence D'Oliveiro, Sep 29th, 2009 @ 8:18pm

   
   

   The Stupid Thing Is...

   ...there is already a law against driving “without due care and attention”, which you would think would be ample to catch those misusing mobile phones, make-up compacts, cheese graters, lion-taming kits, or indeed any past, present or future technological item that could reasonably cause a distraction. Yet the Government had to go out of its way to pass a new law specifically addressing mobile phones. Thereby catching some unintended fish in its net, which it then has to go back and release by adding yet another complication on top of the unnecessary complication it already introduced.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

9.  

   

   Oh noes, Sep 29th, 2009 @ 9:01pm

   
   

   Oh noes

   Look! An apostrophe! Let's lose our minds and fall over backwards, frothing at the mouth!
   
   
   It's 2009.
   
   
   Learn to deal with apostrophes.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

10.  

    

    Anonymous Coward, Sep 30th, 2009 @ 12:05am

    
    

    Re: Oh noes

    What the hell are you talking about?

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

11.  

    

    ChadBroChill (profile), Sep 30th, 2009 @ 1:21am

    
    

    Re: Oh noes

    Que? Are you crazy or just on the wrong site?

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

12.  

    

    Anonymous Coward, Sep 30th, 2009 @ 3:55am

    
    

    Re: Oh noes

    Let's lose our minds and fall over backwards, frothing at the mouth!
    
    What are you doing, giving a demonstration?

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

13.  

    

    Anonymous Coward, Sep 30th, 2009 @ 3:59am

    
    

    Texting too...

    They should update the law to allow texting and emailing while driving too. Sometimes you need to get directions while driving and not everyone has GPS.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

14.  

    

    Killer_Tofu (profile), Sep 30th, 2009 @ 6:46am

    
    

    Re: The Stupid Thing Is...

    That is the same problem I have with them passing "no talking on cell phone while driving" laws here in the US (or anywhere really). There are already laws for reckless endangerment and failure to illustrate due care and stuff like that. So why do we need laws banning tiny little things here and there. Some people drive just fine talking on a cell phone. Others do not. For those who do not there are already laws to ticket them.
    I guess it is just the politicians trying to justify their existence. If only we had actual public servants instead of politicians we would be a lot better off.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

15.  

    

    Anonymous Coward, Sep 30th, 2009 @ 7:12am

    
    

    Re: Re: The Stupid Thing Is...

    That is the same problem I have with them passing "no talking on cell phone while driving" laws here in the US (or anywhere really). There are already laws for reckless endangerment and failure to illustrate due care and stuff like that. So why do we need laws banning tiny little things here and there. Some people drive just fine talking on a cell phone. Others do not. For those who do not there are already laws to ticket them.
    
    Amen. The same thing applies to those stupid drinking and driving laws too. Some people can drink and drive just fine, others cannot. For those who cannot there are other laws that can be applied.
    
    I guess it is just the politicians trying to justify their existence. If only we had actual public servants instead of politicians we would be a lot better off.
    
    It's the feminization of society and the resultant pandering by politicians to groups like MADD.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

16.  

    

    leo, Oct 1st, 2009 @ 4:06am

    
    

    what a stupid legislation system.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment