Cash4Gold Drops Lawsuit Against Consumerist... Still Suing Whistleblowers
from the dear-streisand... dept
It looks like the folks over at Cash4Gold have finally realized that it wasn't a particularly smart move to sue Consumerist for reporting on various allegations made against Cash4Gold. The company has dropped that part of the lawsuit, though it continues to sue the ex-employees it accuses of both defamation and "publishing any more confidential, proprietary information" (and, note, they don't say which info was defamatory or which was confidential and proprietary). Consumerist makes it very clear that this wasn't a settlement. They didn't ask to be dropped from the case or agree to anything. One would guess that somewhere down the line a lawyer explained to Cash4Gold that its likelihood of winning such a case was about as close to zero as you could imagine...






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Or of anyone else with a little common sense.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Broken law
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Broken law
Smartest thing I have read all day.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Broken law
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Broken law
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Broken law
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Suggestion
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Broken law
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Clara_County_v._Southern_Pacific_Railroad
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Broken law
I find it interesting that a corporation has the right to free speech. This makes no sense. How does a corp speak, as it is not a living being. Is its speech similar to that of a mannequin ? Everyone can see the ventriloquist's lips moving and only small childeren are fooled.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment