Sneaky UK Attempt To DRM Television

from the not-this-again dept

Danny O'Brien over at the EFF has the details on how the entertainment industry is attempting to push through an attempt to DRM TV in the UK. It's not quite a "broadcast flag," but close enough. In the last few years, since the original fight over the "broadcast flag" ended in "failure" for Hollywood, they keep attempting to sneak it through in other ways. In the US, it's been via "selectable output control," or SOC. Over in the UK, it's a bit different, but no less ridiculous. Basically, there would be some encoded metadata with all digital TV channels, and the algorithm would be kept "secret." As Danny notes, this has nothing to do with preventing copying, and everything to do with giving the entertainment industry yet another "veto" on innovation (similar to the anti-circumvention clause of the DMCA):
In Britain, as in the United States, this proposal isn't about piracy. It's about creating a rightsholder veto over new consumer technologies in DTV.

No British commercial digital TV manufacturer would risk any innovation that might invalidate their "metadata compression parameter" license, and leave them open to litigation. And competition between devices would be limited by the byzantine requirements that DRM requires (it's notable that the BBC says the rightsholders demands came via the Digital Transmission Licensing Administrator (DTLA), a DRM consortium who would clearly benefit from mandatory adoption of its own system.)
But, of course, in an era of copyright moral panics, we'll hear over and over again about how this is all about stopping "piracy" -- even though it actually does nothing to prevent unauthorized copying.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 15th, 2009 @ 3:20pm

    This looks like another licensing fee broadcasters will have to pay to ensure their content will play on compliant TV sets.

    Aren't there enough fees, licenses, taxes and payouts to third parties not involved with the creative workflow already?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    Richard (profile), Sep 15th, 2009 @ 3:25pm

    As far as I can see the only function of this is to minimally lock in the equipment manufacturers before it's too late (HD terrestrial broadcasts are scheduled for this December).
    Fortunately it sounds like the BBC doesn't really want it but would like somebody else (OFCOM) to tell them not to so they can stand up to the content lobby more effectively.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    MattP, Sep 15th, 2009 @ 3:48pm

    Something's missing

    I saw no 'think of the children' clause in there. How do they expect to get this passed without some good ole fashioned FUD.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    icon
    DJ (profile), Sep 15th, 2009 @ 3:50pm

    Re:

    The answer to that question will be "No" until the government has complete control over ALL broadcasts.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    The Stuffy Churchill of Meeeeedia, Sep 15th, 2009 @ 4:06pm

    The frustration of every home in our Island, in our Empire, and indeed throughout the world, except in the abodes of the compensated, goes out to the entertainment industry lobbyists who, undaunted by odds, unwearied in their constant challenge and encroaching obsolescence, are turning the tide of the Information War by their bribery and by their devotion. Never in the field of human entertainment was so much ($$) "owed" by so many to so few.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 15th, 2009 @ 5:49pm

    "In the United States, rightsholders claimed that without DRM, digital TV would herald an age of uncontrolled piracy and they would have no choice but to boycott a flag-less terrestrial digital TV transition."

    http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/09/broadcast-flag-uk

    Great, more unsubstantiated scare mongering and threats of the world falling apart and life as we know it ending if the rich and the powerful don't get their way with government sanctioned distortions of the free market in their favor. Then these people turn around and claim to be free market capitalists, roflol.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    ..., Sep 15th, 2009 @ 6:13pm

    Outer Limits

    There is nothing wrong with your television set. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling transmission. If we wish to make it louder, we will bring up the volume. If we wish to make it softer, we will tune it to a whisper. We will control the horizontal. We will control the vertical. We can roll the image, make it flutter. We can change the focus to a soft blur or sharpen it to crystal clarity. For the next hour, sit quietly and we will control all that you see and hear. We repeat: there is nothing wrong with your television set. You are about to participate in a great adventure. You are about to experience the awe and mystery which reaches from the inner mind to... The Outer Limits.
    — Opening narration – The Control Voice – 1960s

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    Krusty, Sep 15th, 2009 @ 6:41pm

    Re:

    "Aren't there enough fees, licenses, taxes and payouts to third parties not involved with the creative workflow already?"

    NO, now shut up and pay up suckers.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Rekrul, Sep 15th, 2009 @ 7:17pm

    This would be a non-issue if all the electronics manufacturers told the entertainment industry to shove their demands. The entertainment industry might succeed in getting a law passed that says that electronics companies have to include this crap in their devices, but there's no law that says the companies have to build them in the first place. I'd like to see what the entertainment industry would do if every company refused to build any new TVs or DVRs until these demands were withdrawn.

    Of course that would never work because there isn't a single company that will put their customers ahead of profits...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    icon
    Richard (profile), Sep 16th, 2009 @ 2:20am

    Re: Outer Limits

    Sadly what we won't get is the bit at the end that said "now we return control of your TV set to you..."

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 16th, 2009 @ 10:47pm

    Fawk 'em!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This