Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1.  

   

   Big Al, Sep 3rd, 2009 @ 9:36pm

   
   

   Meanwhile, WTO sanctions against the US over this ridiculous farce continue...

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2.  

   

   Roman, Sep 4th, 2009 @ 12:25am

   
   

   The law was put into place only because income derived from online gambling cannot be monitored and therefore does not generate tax revenue. It is yet another example of how we are not allowed to make money unless the govt gets their cut.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

3.  

   Re:

   

   Nick, Sep 4th, 2009 @ 5:06am

   
   

   Actually, if you're talking about Antigua, the sanctions don't "continue." They can start any once Antigua moves to enforce them, but they haven't yet.
   
   But I absolutely agree. It is definitely illegal for Congress to protect OTB (which is what this law was all about) at the expense of authors and artists who now have lost (once Antigua decides to move on it) the right to be paid for their works abroad. Once Antigua moves, expect a lawsuit against this law of a very different kind than the one mentioned in this post.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

4.  

   Re:

   

   Sean T Henry (profile), Sep 4th, 2009 @ 6:50am

   
   

   "The law was put into place only because income derived from online gambling cannot be monitored and therefore does not generate tax revenue."
   
   That does not make sense, the same thing could be said about Vegas gambling. All that would have to be done is pass a law stating when any funds are withdrawn from an online gambling taxes (federal) must be deducted from payout. Then if the site does not do so they would be charged with tax evasion and illegally running a gambling establishment.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

5.  

   

   JEDIDIAH, Sep 4th, 2009 @ 7:36am

   
   

   Actually, Vegas gambling is very tightly regulated. That is something likely sorely missing from the operations on Antigua. However, that is not the point. This law has nothing to do with "protectionism". It's a manifestation of the MPD syndrome that America has regarding "vice" in general. This is stuff that isn't even consistent on a state to state or county by county level in the US. The idea that another country has a cause of action is absurd.
   
   This isn't lumber or DRAM chips we're talking about. All attempts to conflate this issue with those involving non-controversial commodities or products is fundementally dishonest.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

6.  

   

   Kazi, Sep 4th, 2009 @ 7:56am

   
   

   Remember how China protects its interests with Patent Law? (Recently posted)
   
   USA is protecting its interests with Gambling Law!

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

7.  

   Re: Re:

   

   Kazi, Sep 4th, 2009 @ 7:58am

   
   

   What if they aren't US companies and have no US based operations. Their operations are internet based.
   
   Your response does not make sense. Not every online gambling company is in the USA. US law can't force companies outside the USA to do something.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

8.  

   What!?

   

   Glenn, Sep 4th, 2009 @ 9:19am

   
   

   You mean there are people who think they have the right to decide what they can do with their own money? ...how to live their own lives? Well, shame on them!
   
   (We did it once--prohibition. We can do it again. If it's going to take a Constitutional amendment to actually enforce our basic human rights, then We The People will do it... or just ignore asinine, fascist laws in the first place.)

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

9.  

   Re: Re:

   

   btr1701 (profile), Sep 4th, 2009 @ 9:44am

   
   

   > Then if the site does not do so they would be charged with tax
   > evasion and illegally running a gambling establishment.
   
   How exactly is the US going to charge a web site owner in Belize with tax evasion? Citizens of Belize have no obligation to follow US tax law.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

10.  

    Weird Laws

    

    Ben, Sep 4th, 2009 @ 11:33am

    
    

    Here is the thing though. Let us pretend Congressman A wants a law in place but in order to get it to pass Congressman B has to vote for it. Congressman B, however; doesnt really care about this particular law but instead wants a different law passed, something small but important to B's career. Suddenly you get a law saving the ports and at the same time preventing online gambling. Completely unrelated topics and a bad law for that but law nevertheless. Not necessarily is that what happened here but it does occur.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

11.  

    Re: What!?

    

    Wise one, Sep 5th, 2009 @ 2:20pm

    
    

    We the people? There's been a major cultural change since the prohibition. Most Americans today don't even know the constitution, let alone most amendments thereto, nor even the English language! And the porch monkeys have multiplied some million-fold it seems, most of who can't read anything as simple as "see Dick run". These are today's American voters. And you expect them to do what?
    
    VRP

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment