Burning Man's Copyright Grab

from the and-that's-how-it-goes dept

The Burning Man event is supposed to be all about personal freedom and freedom of expression... but apparently the organizers feel a bit differently about it. The EFF notes that the terms of service you agree to in attending Burning Man, includes a neat little legal claim that if anyone does anything that the Burning Man organizers don't like with your photos or videos, you agree to hand the copyright over to them, so they can force it offline.
I agree that, in the event I post, or allow to be posted, any images (still or video) on a personal website or a website controlled by a third party, that (1) in the event Burning Man notifies me that any such images must be removed, for any reason whatsoever in Burning Man's sole discretion, I will promptly remove or cause to be removed those images; and (2) I will place, or cause to be placed, on any website in which such images are displayed a notice that the images can be used only for the poster's personal use and not for any other purpose and that downloading or copying of the images is prohibited. I further agree that, in the event any third party displays or disseminates any of my images in a manner not authorized by this agreement, I assign to Burning Man the copyright so that Burning Man can enforce against the third party any restrictions concerning use of the images, and I appoint Burning Man as my attorney-in-fact to execute any documents necessary to effectuate such assignment.
Free expression! Except if we don't like it.

EFF also notes that the same agreement attempts to get you to waive your fair use rights (which can't be taken away that way) on its trademark, even to the point that you're not allowed to, say, post images labeled "Burning Man 2009." The reasoning behind this is that Burning Man wants to avoid any sort of "commercialization," but abusing copyright and trademark law to do so doesn't seem particularly reasonable.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    icon
    slacker525600 (profile), Aug 13th, 2009 @ 10:47am

    gonna go ahead and say

    they are also probably a bit worried about having photos labeled Burning man 2009 of people doing massive amounts of drugs in the middle of the dessert.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 13th, 2009 @ 11:00am

    I am a bit worried about not having a pony on my 16th birthday like I always wanted. If wishes were fishes...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Doctor Strange, Aug 13th, 2009 @ 11:09am

    This is the second time in two days you've indicated that you cannot waive your fair use rights in some way (license, contract). I did some searching but couldn't find anything to substantiate (or specifically refute) this. Can you cite a source for this assertion?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      taoareyou (profile), Aug 13th, 2009 @ 11:50am

      Re:

      This is the second time in two days you've indicated that you cannot waive your fair use rights in some way (license, contract). I did some searching but couldn't find anything to substantiate (or specifically refute) this. Can you cite a source for this assertion? The waiver of your constitutional right of freedom of speech cannot be usurped by a legal paragraph printed on the back of a ticket. Buying a ticket to an event does not equal signing a non-disclosure act. And it certainly would not cover arbitrary forced control and censorship of your personal photos and accounts based on non-published criteria. As long as what you post is not maliciously false with the intent to cause damage to the Burning Man trademark they cannot force you to give up certain rights. Imagine if that was the case, then every business you walk into would post a little page on their front windows stating that you waive all rights to sue them for any reason upon entering, and you transfer copyright of any experiences you publish related to them in any format so they can force anything negative about them to be removed. Fortunately that is not the case and business cannot force you to waive basic rights through the act of patronage. Of course, if that were to come to pass, I can see people wearing t-shirts declaring that by allowing them entrance to a store, the store is waiving all rights to prosecute them for shoplifting. :)

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Mike, Sep 6th, 2009 @ 7:39am

        Re: Re:

        They just want to make money off the posters of these pictures from law suites is all. By making you hand over your stuff to them to start legal proceedings, The promoters win the bucks. Greed, what is it good for? Absolutly nothing!

        Everyone that steps onto the playa knows if you get in the buff there you will probably get a pic of yourself online if you are good looking and female and even male. You go there to let your hair down and do these things. My god just google some of the porn sites and you get way more. This is innocent expression of the of the people of the world that is one of the last places to go to be extreamly happy for a week. Start cutting back the fun and we will find it els where!

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Pwdrskir (profile), Aug 13th, 2009 @ 11:20am

    Hypocriminal

    How do these guys justify allowing massive illegal drug consumption, but get uptight about pictures and video posts? Cartman: “They're not people! They're hippies!”

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Alan Gerow (profile), Aug 13th, 2009 @ 12:11pm

      Re: Hypocriminal

      Actually, there are very few hippies at Burning Man. It's a majority of artists, retirees, and ravers. You're more likely to find a redneck in a pick-up truck with a bullhorn making fun of hippies than actually seeing any hippies.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Alan Gerow (profile), Aug 14th, 2009 @ 12:10pm

        Re: Re: Hypocriminal

        And my fiance pointed out that I missed mentioning techies. You can't throw a rock at Burning Man without (1) getting yelled at for mooping/littering, and (2) hitting a programmer or DJ.

        There's a long standing joke that you can't get code written in Silicon Valley the week before Labor Day. Because all the programmers are at Burning Man. The two Google founders still attend regularly.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      brc burning girl, Aug 15th, 2009 @ 12:31am

      Re: Hypocriminal

      "massive illegal drug consumption"
      You are an idiot! You have never even been there so, how the hell do you know what is allowed?
      NOTHING illegal is tolerated and there are several jurisdictions of law enforcement present at this event.

      Get your head out of your ass!

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Pwdrskir (profile), Aug 26th, 2009 @ 10:29pm

        Re: Re: Hypocriminal

        I wonder how the guy who holds up a bag of drugs in the following Burning Man video got away from the several jurisdictions of law enforcement. You’re a fool if you don’t think illegal drugs are being used, hell, I went to a concert in the middle of a city last weekend and there were people sitting on the grass smoking dope and doing all manor of hallucinogens and X. Pull your head out of your ass and face reality, illegal drugs are everywhere. The video sure looks and sounds like a hippie gathering to me.
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYEBdlRLJhI

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 13th, 2009 @ 11:25am

    Hell if I am going to have a party there it will be greater than 3.

    Good luck enforcing that overseas!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Phillip Vector (profile), Aug 13th, 2009 @ 11:30am

    Photos and such

    If anyone going to burning man wants to protect their files, then email me and I'll host them (no charge). If anyone comes to me with a request to take them down, I'll site fair use and won't.

    Yes, I'm serious.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Michial Thompson, Aug 13th, 2009 @ 11:37am

    If you agree not to use them fair use does not apply

    IF you agree to their terms, then fair use won't apply because you will be in violation of you agreement not to use the photos.

    Your "fair use" rights to using photos only apply if do not agree to any other terms for their use.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Aug 13th, 2009 @ 11:44am

      Re: If you agree not to use them fair use does not apply

      Yes, cause we know how hidden legalese is sooooo enforceable when it actually hits a judge.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      DJ (profile), Aug 13th, 2009 @ 1:36pm

      Re: If you agree not to use them fair use does not apply

      "The waiver of your constitutional right of freedom of speech cannot be usurped by a legal paragraph printed on the back of a ticket" from taoareyou

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Sue Nugent, Aug 13th, 2009 @ 11:37am

    Copyright-Burning Man

    yeah what actually started out by clip art pirates now is OWNED by people-interesting-I guess my burning man book will now have to be BURNED

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Shawn (profile), Aug 13th, 2009 @ 11:38am

    I am going to print out a bunch of my burning man pix and tape them to the Wall Street bull and take pictures of that....it will be come to be known in the future as 'The event that caused the vortex'

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Michael Kirkland, Aug 13th, 2009 @ 12:11pm

    This is to protect people who've had their picture taken at Burning Man without their permission.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      DJ (profile), Aug 13th, 2009 @ 1:39pm

      Re:

      Here's a big shocker:
      If you're out in public, YOU are public domain. ANYONE has the right to take your picture. Publishing said picture for profit needs permission, but simply taking the picture doesn't.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        taoareyou (profile), Aug 13th, 2009 @ 3:12pm

        Re: Re:

        f you're out in public, YOU are public domain. ANYONE has the right to take your picture. Publishing said picture for profit needs permission

        No, permission is NOT required to publish any photo you take of any person. If I see you in public, and I take your photo, I can sell and/or publish that photo of you without your permission.

        If permission were required, papparazzi's would never be able to sell any photos, you would never see photos of celebrities in clubs in magazines, etc. If I take your picture legally (i.e. not tresspassing or taking a photo of you in a place where you have a reasonable right to privacy, such as using a public restroom) I can do whatever I like with my photo...including making a profit from it.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous, Aug 13th, 2009 @ 2:38pm

      Re:

      Exactly... Eric Schmidt doesn't want anymore Burning Man pics of him in a pink cowboy hat and pink shirt partying with a skinny naked guy painted silver circulating on the Internets.

      http://valleywag.gawker.com/260194/eric-schmidt-at-burning-man

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Alan Gerow (profile), Aug 13th, 2009 @ 12:21pm

    I've had run-ins with the Burning Man IP police on 3rd party sites that didn't question the validity of the borg's claim.

    I had a design on Cafe Press that only had "BRC" in a sans-serif font within a circle ("BRC" can be the initials for "Black Rock City", the official name given to the temporary city by event organizers). Evidently, the borg claims ownership of "BRC" as a trademark (which I thought went along with logos and identity, not simply putting 3 letters in succession in any context). Cafe Press, without question, took down my design.

    I've also had event organizers claim I couldn't use burningman.spacemonkeymafia.com as a sub-domain to my website when I was creating a website for my theme camp. I had already come up with a better idea and went with playa.spacemonkeymafia.com, since playa is a generic Spanish word for "beach", in addition to the name given to land where Burning Man is held which is an ancient sea bed and very beachy.

    It's utterly ridiculous how far the Burning Man organization takes their ownership over the event so far to the totalitarian extremes, that it's almost hypocritical in that they feel the ends justify the means. They stand on the pillars of radical self-reliance, radical self-expression, and radical inclusionism, but act as a school yard bully, extinguishes as much expression that it doesn't like as it can, and creates a walled barrier between them and everyone else.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Jiminoid, Aug 13th, 2009 @ 12:33pm

    hippy

    As someone I used to know would say: "Scratch a hippy, find a fascist."

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    dieselm, Aug 13th, 2009 @ 12:47pm

    So is it legally binding?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    bob, Aug 13th, 2009 @ 1:39pm

    Hippies and Helmets

    When one attempts to impose their will upon another that is fascism.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Dark Helmet (profile), Aug 13th, 2009 @ 1:44pm

      Re: Hippies and Helmets

      You know hippies that are IMPOSING their will on others? What hippies are these, who are they, and where are they? Because I need to send them a letter stating very simply: "Dear whoever, you are not a hippy."

      On the other hand, most of the hippies I know are too stoned and/or lethargic to IMPOSE anything. In fact, I'm fairly certain there's something in the definition of a pacifist that would directly contradict any imposition at all, whatsoever. I'm not a particulaly big fan of the hippie culture, specifically since so many of them were hypocrites, but IMPOSE...nuh uh.

      So....what are you talking about?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      DJ (profile), Aug 13th, 2009 @ 1:45pm

      Re: Hippies and Helmets

      umm no THIS is fascism:
      noun-a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.

      attempting to impose your will upon another is just wanting to control someone. There's no simple classification into which you can lump all people who do that. GTFOY

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Dark Helmet (profile), Aug 13th, 2009 @ 2:11pm

        Re: Re: Hippies and Helmets

        "umm no THIS is fascism:
        noun-a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism."

        You're technically absolutely correct, just don't forget 2 important points:

        A. The definition of fascism has changed several times in the past 100 years, altered slightly but meaningfully.

        B. The people that put out the English dictionary are large companies that have a vested interest in controlling speech and thought.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Sallo, Aug 13th, 2009 @ 1:47pm

    banning the pics

    Ok, my theory is this:

    With all the naked people running taking pics of other naked people, the organizers of BM want to make sure that only the pics of the good looking naked people get posted. By having the copyright disclaimer they can try and get the pics of the fat and ugly naked people taken off of websites...because we all know that fat, ugly naked people is not good for marketing.

    Why this theory you ask? it is simple.

    Look at who they cater to these days. It just so happens I live just down the street from one of the popular supermarkets that is a last stop for a lot of peeps on the way out of town...for those who know the area it's on the corner of Pyramid & McCarren.

    By the end of the month it is going to be a parade of late model Escalade's & Navigator's being driven by thirty-something yuppies towing the dirtiest and nastiest camper trailers that could find and spray painted the shit out of it in the parking lot of the local Salvation Army parking lot while buying the 'fugliest' clothes they could so they can look like they belong.

    Don't get me wrong, I am not bitter, it is actually good for the local economy and I even quite a few of them that go.

    But it comes down to marketing. If your target audience is the thirty-something yuppy, you don't want to advertise hairy pitted chicks that are old, fat, ugly and naked to them.

    This is just a theory and I could be way WRONG!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 13th, 2009 @ 7:06pm

    burning man === burned out.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Joshua, Aug 13th, 2009 @ 9:27pm

    I'm an organizer of Alchemy, a Burning Man regional burn in Georgia. Here's what we did with our IP:

    http://alchemyfestival.com/about/terms.html

    In the interest of giving as much ownership of the event as possible to the participants in the event, we waive all copyright and IP rights to the Alchemy Logo. This means that you are free to use the Alchemy Logo, pictured to the left, in whatever way you want, including ways that we personally might disagree with, such as for personal profit. This also means that it is up to you to use the logo responsibly and to decide whether or not you want to reward others who might use the logo in ways that are not consistent with the Principles around which the event is organized. It's your (intellectual) property; please take good care of it.

    Although we waive all rights to the logo, we retain all rights and trademarks to the phrase, "Alchemy: The Georgia Burn." If you would like to use this term, please contact us at board@alchemyfestival.com to request permission. Blanket permission is granted to use this term on any item or in any performance that is distributed for free and exclusively at an Alchemy-sponsored event. In other words, if you're making schwag to give away at the event, or if you're planning a performance at the event, you are free to use the event's title. If you're not sure, email us to ask for permission, and we'll probably give it to you.

    Currently, Alchemy LLC sponsors only two events: The Alchemy Festival itself and the Alchemy Art Fundraiser that occurs in the summer. If you see any other events using the Alchemy logo to promote themselves, you are welcome to contact board@alchemyfestival.com to determine whether they are actually associated with Alchemy or not.

    [CC0 LOGO]

    To the extent possible under law, Alchemy Festival, LLC has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to The Alchemy Logo. This work is published from United States.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Dale Scott, Aug 15th, 2009 @ 9:52pm

    Burningman copyright

    So, how is OK for Cliff's Variety to advertise 'Burning Man Stuff' on a 4x6 foot poster on the wall of a downtown SF BART station? Where's the outrage?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This