Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

•  

  

  Ima Fish (profile), Aug 7th, 2009 @ 2:01pm

  
  

  I was hoping to find the statute for the charge of possession or selling of unlabed recordings in Westlaw, but had no luck. A search for "unlabel!" (without the quotes) brought up nothing of relevance. Mmmm...

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, Aug 7th, 2009 @ 2:03pm

  
  

  Maybe it has to do with rules within the prison itself, specifically if they are trying to keep porn or whatever out.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Ben (profile), Aug 7th, 2009 @ 2:17pm

  
  

  Re:

  I think Mike is referring to the original charge which landed him in prison?

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Ben in TX (profile), Aug 7th, 2009 @ 2:23pm

  
  

  I live in TX and have never heard this before, but am now a little worried that I may be at risk... I've certainly burnt discs for personal use in the past and taken them with me in the car without ever adding a label.
  
  Silly me, WHAT was I thinking???

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, Aug 8th, 2009 @ 2:46pm

  
  

  Re:

  OMG..... TERRORIST.... you have burned CDs and are contributing to the terrorists by not buying the all those awesome products 500 times.
  
  :)

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Glaze (profile), Aug 7th, 2009 @ 2:26pm

  
  

  Wha wha what!!!

  "Harris County District Attorney's spokeswoman Donna Hawkins said both charges are third-degree felonies, punishable by two to 10 years in prison upon conviction."
  
  I guess I would like to know how possession of an unlabeled recording is 3rd degree felony? Anyone got any answers on that one... And as far as the gun goes... no wonder they couldn't find it he was 500+ lbs. and never had to go through a metal detector or be wanded.
  
  Now I know someone who was a prison guard for quite some time... and all the inmates were required to go through metal detectors and be wanded, but she told me there were a few times when some of the larger ones would get in with some sort of metal weapon becuase the metal detectors couldn't penetrate the mounds of fat and flesh...

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  chris (profile), Aug 7th, 2009 @ 2:34pm

  
  

  does the label have to be correct?

  clearly you can be hanged in texas for unlabeled CD's, what about mislabeled CD's?
  
  sometimes i accidentally spell "New Kids On The Block" as "Child Pornography". i have an old label maker and the keys are right next to each other.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, Aug 7th, 2009 @ 2:53pm

  
  

  Re: does the label have to be correct?

  PNSFW text (new window)
  
  :-)

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  VRP, Aug 8th, 2009 @ 12:04pm

  
  

  Re: does the label have to be correct?

  It's my understanding that in the Republic of Texas anyone arrested for anything gets two things; a death sentence, and "cert denied" from SCUS -- likely a form notice, pre-signed, mimeographed a million copies that's dated by a lowly clerk and automatically sent to all petitioners from TX.
  
  VRP

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Kevin Stapp (profile), Aug 7th, 2009 @ 2:44pm

  
  

  Houston Chronicle

  I called the Houston Chronicle and they stated the charge is really possession 'illegally bootlegged albums'. The issue isn't that the CD's are 'unlabled' but the fact he was running a bootlegging operation.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  BullJustin (profile), Aug 7th, 2009 @ 2:47pm

  
  

  Does this mean that anyone who burns some music to a blank-DVR could be in trouble?

  Did you mean blank-CDR?

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  mike42 (profile), Aug 7th, 2009 @ 2:50pm

  
  

  Uh, Illinois...

  It IS illegal to possess unlabeled DVD's in Illinois. Why not Texas?
  
  http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp?DocName=072000050K16-8

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  JD, Aug 7th, 2009 @ 3:23pm

  
  

  Re: Uh, Illinois...

  IANAL, but readying it's clear that the statute deals with for profit bootleggers. It specifically calls for "for profit", and not you or I just having blank CD-Rs or compilation CDs....

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  ChurchHatesTucker (profile), Aug 7th, 2009 @ 4:35pm

  
  

  Re: Re: Uh, Illinois...

  "IANAL, but readying it's clear that the statute deals with for profit bootleggers. It specifically calls for "for profit", and not you or I just having blank CD-Rs or compilation CDs...."
  
  And you can tell the difference how?

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Vic, Aug 7th, 2009 @ 4:44pm

  
  

  Re: Re: Uh, Illinois...

  I can see it on eBay already:
  
  Up for sale a brand newly burned CD with some unidentified sounds supposedly from a recent UFO landing. I have not marked the CD, since I am not sure what kind of sound it is.
  
  Bidders from IL - please do not bother bidding. It's illegal in your state!

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, Aug 7th, 2009 @ 10:32pm

  
  

  Re: Re: Uh, Illinois...

  So, if I were to make my own recordings, and didn't label them, and then sold them, I would be commiting a 3rd degree felony? I don't get it. I'm definitely doing it for profit aren't I?
  
  I could type a line of text in my notepad and save it in the discs, and they would have to be classified as recording, wouldn't them?

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Spaceman Spiff (profile), Aug 8th, 2009 @ 7:48pm

  
  

  Re: Uh, Illinois...

  The statute states:
  
  "A person commits unlawful use of unidentified sound or audio visual recordings when he intentionally, knowingly, recklessly or negligently for profit manufactures, advertises or offers for sale, sells, distributes, transports, vends, circulates, performs, leases, or possesses for such purposes, unidentified sound or audio visual recordings or causes the manufacture, advertisement or offer for sale, sale, distribution, transportation, vending, circulation, performance, lease, or possession for such purposes, unidentified sound or audio visual recordings."
  
  Note, the phrase "for profit". It sounds that if you aren't doing this for profit, then you aren't in violation of the statute. I think I'll ask my lawyer (I live in Illinois) who owes me a couple of hours quid pro quo for some work I did on his computers.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Simon, Aug 7th, 2009 @ 2:50pm

  
  

  He should have moved to Canada

  At least they only you 'fine' you $0.29 per CD!

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  TW Burger (profile), Aug 7th, 2009 @ 3:31pm

  
  

  I am Canadian! Tax the Sh*t out of Me!

  The recording industry has received hundreds of dollars from me due to this this CD/DVD tax they somehow convinced the Canadian government to levy. I have only used my purchased CDs or DVDs to make a (very few) backups of what I had already paid for or for backing up computer data. The record companies owe me and many others a large amount of money. I do not believe for a moment that the artists and song writers get a single penny from the CD tax. If they do get most of the money I would be OK with it. Can anyone give me an example of a Canadian artist that gets any CD tax money?

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  ..., Aug 7th, 2009 @ 5:28pm

  
  

  Another reason to avoid texas

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Guillermo, Aug 7th, 2009 @ 6:11pm

  
  

  Illegal to cross the border with CD-Rs

  I live in the northeast part of Mexico, just 2 hours south of the Texas border. There were a couple of articles in the local newspaper (in spanish) about how it was 'illegal' to cross the border with an unlabeled CD-R containing mp3s or any other kind of audio and/or video file, and that it could mean the revocation of your border crossing VISA (also called Laser VISA). In the latest article there was also mention that the INS patrol (the guys who check your visas and allow you entry into the US) would be able to search if you had an iPod or other mp3 device and deny you entry. TBH I don't know how much of the article was true, but it scared many people I know into not bringing any mp3 player or mp3 CDs when travelling to the US.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Silver, Aug 8th, 2009 @ 5:18pm

  
  

  No such law.

  I went through the TX statutes and found *nothing* regarding possession of unlabeled CDs.
  
  However, Sec. 641.051 specifically forbids unauthorized duplication of recordings for sale, and Sec. 641.054 addresses unlabeled recordings for sale.
  
  I think your avg. Joe Blow isn't looking to sell that mix CD he's listening to on his way to work, so wouldn't be prosecutable under those statutes.
  
  For reference: Business and Commerce Code Title 14 - Chapter 641

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  quash, Aug 10th, 2009 @ 7:07am

  
  

  Re: No such law.

  Nice catch, thanks.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Richard, Aug 9th, 2009 @ 3:16am

  
  

  Unidentified - vs unauthorised

  So if I sell clearly identified but illegal copies of some music or films I am OK but if I sell copies of my own films or music - just without labels - I am breaking the law.
  
  Are the people who wrote this law sane?

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, Aug 10th, 2009 @ 9:19am

  
  

  Re: Unidentified - vs unauthorised

  So if I sell clearly identified but illegal copies of some music or films I am OK

  You're safe under this particular law. But there are so many others... 8^)

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Vic, Aug 10th, 2009 @ 9:19am

  
  

  Re: Unidentified - vs unauthorised

  So if I sell clearly identified but illegal copies of some music or films I am OK

  You're safe under this particular law. But there are so many others... 8^)

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Silver, Aug 10th, 2009 @ 11:50am

  
  

  Re: Unidentified - vs unauthorised

  You're missing the *unauthorized* part - obviously if you're selling unlabeled copies of your own works, it's not *un*authorized....

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Matt, Aug 9th, 2009 @ 8:58pm

  
  

  ...Unidentified - vs unauthorised

  I think that if you are selling your own films or music you would be ok, as long as you could prove you own the copyright... Now as to the first part...that still goes under current anti-piracy laws, and I tend to stay away from anything that the FBI have jurisdiction over...

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Steve C, Aug 10th, 2009 @ 4:28pm

  
  

  Re: ...Unidentified - vs unauthorised

  Tell that to the cop that has you pulled over.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  sprearson81 (profile), Jun 9th, 2012 @ 6:28am

  
  

  Tell the cops nothing, ever.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

Add Your Comment