South Korea Implements New Copyright Law; ISPs Ban P2P Ads; File Sharers Get Summary Trials

from the ch-ch-ch-changes dept

Looks like a bunch of things are happening in South Korea concerning copyright law there, as I keep seeing new (seemingly unrelated) stories pop up having to do with changes in South Korea. We'd already discussed how South Korea had agreed to a three strikes plan a little while, and how other oddities in the new copyright law were leading Google to forbid uploading any music to blogs for fear of running afoul of an incredibly, broadly-worded law.

It appears that Google's not the only one. Basically any kind of copyright infringement can get you a "strike" -- meaning all kinds of the typical "unintentional infringement" that people do every day that are really harmless can now get you kicked offline. So, all sorts of social networking sites are basically warning their users not to do anything potentially infringing. No homemade videos with music in the background. No mentioning song lyrics. On top of this, South Korean search engines have agreed to stop accepting ads for any sort of P2P file sharing service -- even if it has perfectly legitimate uses.

About the only slightly reasonable thing we've heard is that South Korea is changing the rules for handling lawsuits against those accused of file sharing, basically shifting it from a full trial to something more akin to a small claims court, with the idea being that if someone is found guilty to give them a small fine, rather than the ridiculous numbers the industry usually requests. There was one interesting quote in explaining the reasoning why:
The police say targeting youngsters is unfair because the parents are usually unaware of the illegal activity, and then desperate to come up with the money, the kids resort to theft or other crime to come up with the settlement money demanded by copyright holders.
Nice work, recording industry: apparently you've been driving kids to real crime in your effort to stop file sharing. That said, now that the industry has a massively broad three strikes tool to use, it probably doesn't even need to take as many kids to court. It can just kick them offline.

The crazy thing about this, too, is that the music industry in South Korea has actually been doing a really good job adjusting to the changing market. A huge percentage of folks in South Korea have broadband connections (by which we mean real broadband connections, not what they call broadband in the US), and smart entrepreneurs like JY Park have adapted by changing the business model, recognizing that selling music directly no longer makes sense, but there are plenty of other business models that do. And by embracing that, he's been able to create some massive stars, and bring in a ton of money. So why do we need this drastic change in the law?


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 5:04pm

    Mike, please!

    "Basically any kind of copyright infringement can get you a "strike" -- meaning all kinds of the typical "unintentional infringement" that people do every day that are really harmless can now get you kicked offline"

    Using Torrent Freak as a "source" is and entirely bad idea on a story like this, because their scare factor on reporting is so high. This is anti-torrent, do you expect them to give a truly honest rendering of the facts?

    Sort of like asking a Republican about Obama - you aren't going to get a straight answer.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 5:15pm

      Re:

      Using Torrent Freak as a "source" is and entirely bad idea... blah blah blah

      OK, I'll bite. What source do you recommend for this story? Or would you just prefer that it not be mentioned at all?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 6:08pm

        Re: Re:

        I would say if torrent freak is the only source for the story, then perhaps the story isn't real, or at least not well explained. Take the Torrent Freak story, then go searching for material that supports or debunks it, and work from there.

        Torrent Freak is an involved party, so you have to assume their take is going to be strident and probably a massive over reaction.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Oh My !, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 6:44pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          and why should I take your word for it ... you are probably over reacting because you are an involved party.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 7:00pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            I am not an involved party. I neither make music, nor sell it, nor do I run a torrent site. Sorry, fail.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Luci, Jul 25th, 2009 @ 4:15am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              Which just means you are a disinterested party, and therefore going to err on the other side of caution. There are always two sides to a story, true enough, but your reaction is just as bad as what you purport TorrentFreak's to be.

              If they are such a bad source, then cite some others for us, please. Your blanket comments are otherwise useless.

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Anonymous Coward, Jul 25th, 2009 @ 6:48am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              "I am not an involved party"

              Doesn't sound like it

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Anonymous Coward, Jul 26th, 2009 @ 12:11pm

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              You dislike Torrent Freak, clearly you are a biased source.

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Jul 26th, 2009 @ 10:12pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          I would say if torrent freak is the only source for the story, then perhaps the story isn't real...

          Heh, that's what I suspected. You don't have any better source or anything to dispute it. You just want people to stop talking about it. Now why would you want that? My guess is that you're anything but a disinterested party: Probably someone associated with those behind pushing this kind of legislation in the first place who doesn't want the public aware of what they're up to. Like cockroaches, you industry tools hate it when the light is turned on.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Kate in Korea, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 11:54pm

        Re: Re: Another source

        There's been some talk about this here in Seoul for a few months now. The Korea Times ran a short article about it back in April - http://www.koreatimes.co.kr

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Luci, Jul 25th, 2009 @ 4:30am

          Re: Re: Re: Another source

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            CleverName, Jul 25th, 2009 @ 6:57am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Another source

            from the linked article - koreatimes.co.kr
            "When the Wonder Girls came out with 'Nobody,' netizens uploaded video clips of their versions of the song. The Wonder Girls themselves loved the clips that greatly helped the song gain wider popularity. From now on that will be illegal.
            "It's illegal because any second-hand creations will have to have permission from the original source," complained one netizen.


            Overreaction ? - I dont think so. The artists liked clips that helped their popularity ... but opps ... now look what has happened. So I guess that copyright has nothing to do with the interests of the artist. How does this promote the arts ?

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Anonymous Coward, Jul 25th, 2009 @ 9:29am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Another source

              All the Wondergirls need to do is set up a website to collect these videos, and brand them official and push them off onto the tube sites. It would give them a massively great reason to interact directly with their fans. "Submit your NObody video for official status!".

              Nobody thinks past the ends of their noses!

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              •  
                identicon
                Anonymous Coward, Jul 25th, 2009 @ 11:55am

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Another source

                All the Wondergirls need to do is set up a website to collect these videos, and brand them official and push them off onto the tube sites.

                If you think that setting up your own website or "pushing" has anywhere near the same impact as having your material shared around by large numbers of fans, then you've got a serious perspective problem and a general lack of understand of the scale and dynamics of the situation. That's very short-sighted thinking.

                Nobody thinks past the ends of their noses!

                Indeed.

                 

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                •  
                  identicon
                  Anonymous Coward, Jul 25th, 2009 @ 8:11pm

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Another source

                  Why? It matches the CwF part of Mike's model exactly no?

                   

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                  •  
                    identicon
                    Anonymous Coward, Jul 26th, 2009 @ 10:18pm

                    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Another source

                    Why? It matches the CwF part of Mike's model exactly no?

                    I don't think prosecuting your fans is exactly the kind of "connecting" Mike had in mind.

                     

                    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Leishtek, Jul 25th, 2009 @ 9:33am

    well....the MPAA/RIAA are thieves to begin with...

    ...and their shakedown tactics will draw the "scene" underground, and then it will be harder to track & will involve things not necessarily about trading music. Perhaps dark, sinister things as well.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Hephaestus (profile), Jul 27th, 2009 @ 6:52am

    Just to funny ......

    Just wondering when the tipping point will occur and all of these laws backfire on the Media industry. that causes a great public out cry and politicians to realize this has gone to far.

    Anyone want to speculate on what the catalytic event will be? Or When?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Marcia Neil, Jul 27th, 2009 @ 6:10pm

    substitution

    Forcefeeding copyright law scandal to Korean diplomats and their constituencies will not bring their severely-hazed VA-Tech 'reporter' back to life; the sudden substitution of one scandal type for another in no way brings such shootings to a halt and can be classified as a diversion. The Koreans do not need 'help' to formulate or enforce their own copyright laws; they can also help route out the telephone call-demand network that orchestrated the VaTech massacre unless blocked with copyright-law diversion.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    rocco sifredi, Oct 10th, 2009 @ 11:25pm

    Korea art

    So finally, they did it!!! I have to say that I am very happy to hear that now a law has been made to protect the CREATION. All the new Music industry in Korea is a copy of the American culture. They sometimes only sing on the song in Korean.I am tired of watching the TV and see that only the way they look (sometimes quite nice)is the only talent they do have.
    Korea is not known to be very creative. Everything socks.Everything is copyed from somewhere. They are empty headed.

    Now guy's, do like everybody else, CREATE on you OWN!!!!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This