Is It A Crime To Watch The Naked Erin Andrews Video? No, But It Makes You A Total Jerk

from the didn't-stop-the-NY-Post dept

You may have heard that some miscreant somehow surreptitiously filmed well-known ESPN sportscaster Erin Andrews naked in her hotel room using some sort of pinhole spy camera installed the room. Obviously, this was incredibly illegal (apparently, the suspicion is that it was an insider at ESPN who knew which room she was in) and hopefully the person/people responsible are caught and punished. However, CitMediaLaw points out that some legal analysts are apparently claiming that it's criminal just to watch the video. But, that's not true. It makes you a terrible person, but it's not illegal. After talking about how a talking head legal analyst on CBS claimed it was illegal to watch the video, Carlos Miller checked in with a First Amendment lawyer who balanced the questions clearly:
According to Photography is Not a Crime's legal analyst Marc Randazza (yes, I have a few, so take that, CBS), Bloom is talking out of her ass.

"That CBS analyst needs more legal education and less melodrama," the Florida First Amendment attorney said in an email responding to my question.

He also added that although it is completely legal to download and view the video, he didn't have much respect for anybody who would.

"Anyone who does download it is kind of an asshole," he said. "She did have an expectation of privacy. We live in a society where the sleazes and the lowest common denominator individuals seem to thrive. If we dried up their mud flats, they would die off.

"What I mean by that is that downloading the video is legal. but doing so is a douchebag move. I certainly won't be downloading it (although I personally would love to see her naked too)."
As if to prove the point, apparently, the NY Post posted still images from the video -- and ESPN has responded by banning NY Post writers from ESPN. The Post didn't break the law, but that doesn't make it any less evil a move.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    icon
    Shawn (profile), Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 11:44am

    Banning Post writers from ESPN isn't a crime either and is a reasonable 'Up Yours!' response.

    I do not think I am a jerk cuz I only watched the movie stream I did not download it :D

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    yozoo, Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 12:12pm

    Just Awful

    I just cant believe people today, disgusting . . . anyone got a link?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Ryan, Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 12:21pm

      Re: Just Awful

      I laughed at a comment made on a torrent of it on TPB that went something like this:

      "I agree with you guys, this is a horrible thing to do to somebody. I hope the guy gets caught and spends several years in prison. Just disgusting.

      However, I have been waiting for this video for a long time! I've already jizzed to it five times..."

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        :Lobo Santo (profile), Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 12:29pm

        Re: Re: Just Awful

        Every female out there (if she's not a whale or a dog) should realize: if she's on TV--there's somebody (likely alot of somebodies) who want to see her naked.

        Like, duh.

        The quickest way to diffuse the situation would be for her to pose nude for 2 minutes and then be all like "here ya go" and put in online.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 1:14pm

          Re: Re: Re: Just Awful

          "Every female out there (if she's not a whale or a dog) should realize: if she's on TV--there's somebody (likely alot of somebodies) who want to see her naked."

          LMAO how do ya think they get on TV

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 2:10pm

      Re: Just Awful

      try searching video at bing.com

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Dark Helmet (profile), Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 12:33pm

    The sad part

    The truly sad part of all this is that she isn't that bad of a sideline reporter. She's got a decent voice, a clear camera presence, and (for whatever reason) the players seem to be willing to discuss her questions at some length.

    It's a shame that the fact that she's pretty has caused her to be victimized by all kinds of people: USC football players air-humping her, pinhole cameras, ESPN going out of their way to exploit her looks, etc. etc. etc. I'm not normally on board with the whole feminism thing, but I feel bad for this poor girl who clearly has some degree of talent.

    Just not bad enough to not go download that video once I get off work...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      josh (profile), Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 1:27pm

      Re: The sad part

      OMG DH. I was nodding along agreeing with you. Then I read your last line.

      I so needed that laugh. I just spent the last 2 1/2 hours in a boring ass tele-con. Thank you.

      And of course I know you live for comments like this. :)

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anshar, Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 12:36pm

    Any minute now...

    the words "streisand effect" will actually sink in and people will stop calling attention to these things.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      :Lobo Santo (profile), Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 12:39pm

      Re: Any minute now...

      .... umm, yeah. And what's Paris Hilton famous for?

      K... anything else?

      What, just that? Hmm.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Shawn (profile), Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 12:43pm

        Re: Re: Any minute now...

        Curing Polio?

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Ryan, Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 12:55pm

        Re: Re: Any minute now...

        If you're implying that she may enjoy the additional exposure(heh) from this, I disagree.

        She really didn't need any additional popularity, and it's not like she seeks it out when she's not on camera doing her job. She's never publicly been very pleased with the erotic controversies surrounding her(the USC LB humping her, pictures of her eating a hot dog, allegations of flirting in the locker room, etc.), but she's not stupid; she knows a large part of her popularity is in her attractiveness. Nevertheless, she makes every effort to be prepared and attempts to focus attention on the sport, not on her, and to make it fun.

        I read a few interviews with her, and she sounds really honest, passionate, nice, down-to-earth, and just generally appreciative of the games she covers. The more I read, the worse I felt. One recent interview even quoted her dad saying they thought the Playboy award honoring her for being the hottest sportscaster was amusing, but that she would never appear in the magazine for any other reason(believe that or not, but I did).

        With the nature of this publicity and sports, I wonder if she'll ever really be able to do her job the same way again, and if she'll derive the same enjoyment of it. Hopefully she'll get over it, the crowds and atheletes will be classy to her, and the incident will be forgotten. She adds a fun, attractive, somewhat tongue-in-cheek element to watching while remaining a dedicated professional that makes it more enjoyable for many of us.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          :Lobo Santo (profile), Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 1:03pm

          Re: Re: Re: Any minute now...

          I takes the right kind of crazy to be truly famous...
          Is she the right kind of crazy?

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          ToySouljah (profile), Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 7:12pm

          Re: Re: Re: Any minute now...

          Actually, I didn't know who she was until I read about this...lol. I don't really watch ESPN since I'm not really big on sports. I've always respected women for everything they have to offer and of course their body is a part of that. Now, the way these images were acquired is highly disrespectful to her privacy, and the people responsible should be punished. If she had posed for Playboy or something then it would be a completely different story, but she really should consider it since the pics are out...might as well make them artful and shot by a pro.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        DJ (profile), Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 2:17pm

        Re: Re: Any minute now...

        The difference is that Paris knew the video was being taken. I don't know/care whether or not she likes the fact that it got leaked, but, again, she knew about it.

        Erin Andrews did not.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 3:44pm

          Re: Re: Re: Any minute now...

          Ummm, Paris signed a model release and profits from the movie. Erin Andrews did not.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Lucretious, Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 12:45pm

    so.....anyone got the link to the video?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Kevin Stapp (profile), Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 1:03pm

    Good for ESPN. That's an appropriate response to the NY Post's decision to post pics from this video.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Shawn (profile), Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 1:03pm

    More to the point.. is it a crime to watch Erin Andrews while naked?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 1:16pm

    For all the geeks out there that didn't know about the video and then downloaded it to see what Mike was talking about, that's 'The Masnick Effect'.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 1:17pm

    HEY WAIT A MINUTE!

    I just figured it out . . . Mike just wants to be google indexed on "Naked Erin Andrews Video" . . . you sly fox you!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 1:31pm

    Actually, here is an interesting take. Without proof (model releases), there is no way to prove that the video in question isn't child pr0n. Undocumented sex videos are really bad things to have. There is no way to know the age of the people appearing in the video.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    case, Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 1:33pm

    Look at this silly response from a sport media journalist, here. He wants the internet regulated because of this.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    NullOp, Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 1:49pm

    Naked...

    It isn't a crime to watch it, but it's probably a crime to have it on your computer. It was most certainly a crime to record it!

    By the way, all you drooling geeks, there's a million beautiful, intelligent ladies out there. Stop typing one-handed and leave the house to meet one...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Dark Helmet (profile), Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 1:56pm

      Re: Naked...

      "By the way, all you drooling geeks, there's a million beautiful, intelligent ladies out there. Stop typing one-handed and leave the house to meet one...in an internet chatroom or on adultfriendfinder.com"

      Fixed that one for you.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      DJ (profile), Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 2:20pm

      Re: Naked...

      Leave the house?!?!?!?
      You can DO that???

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    technomage (profile), Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 2:05pm

    could be...

    ESPN finally got it right, and coordinated something like this to increase their ratings. I think I would be looking at her ratings on ESPN and see if they have gone downhill recently. If they have, it is a good argument that this was staged in order to bolster her reputation. Someone made a comment about how women got in TV to begin with, well if what I said is true, she just proved that point, she just did it with Streisand Effect combined with Viral Video.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 2:16pm

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erin_Andrews

    "the press release and the video's subsequent removal spurred tremendous interest in it online.... Two of the top four search queries on Google Search on July 21, 2009 were related to the video.[14]"

    streisand effect hits again

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Sam Bayard, Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 2:32pm

    Some additional legal analysis

    I posted some additional legal analysis on watching/downloading the video, as well as hosting it, on the Citizen Media Law Project site -- http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2009/news-flash-watching-erin-andrews-video-perverted-not-illegal

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 2:34pm

    It's not illegal to film naked people in their hotel rooms (even their homes) if there's no audio. Please read the law Mike.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Clueby4, Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 3:36pm

    TechPuritan is now, eh?

    I don't find it surprising in the least print entertainment going after tv entertainment on this one.

    To me it appears to be karma. Yes, the invasion of her privacy is wrong and should be punished but the resulting interest is a result of the whole entertainmentsurface > newssubstance that exist in today's media.

    The false indignity surrounding this is quite surreal.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    tygreen101, Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 3:37pm

    possible diffusion

    Personally, I think if she would have said, "It's a really good fake. I commend the creater, but you didn't include my tattoo", that the matter would have gone away very quickly. Because of the media attention, everyone wants to see it.

    and before you say, "but what if she doesn't have a tattoo?" does it matter? The point is to redirect it so the matter goes away. If it does surface again that the video is real, she could be coy and say, "I leave that to the perv's imaginations, like I always have."

    but that's my 2 cents.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 4:30pm

    YET!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 7:34pm

    Horrible.

    I've seen the video about a couple dozen times, and I find it dispicable that the picture quality is so poor.

    Anyway, I've reviewed the tape, and I'm pretty sure it's not her, but I want you to be the judge:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hczaiM3LH0M

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    John Doe., Jul 23rd, 2009 @ 7:37pm

    Makes me a jerk? lol what a joke lol, I am the biggest then.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 8:07am

    *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap*.....

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 9:39am

    Well, I guess we can reliably say that ESPN and Erin Andrews are not firmly in the "if you don't have anything to hide, you shouldn't be worried about cameras" way of thinking.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Majdi, Sep 4th, 2009 @ 5:10pm

    Erin Andrews Hotel Video

    Who want the video? I have a copy, but nothing special in it

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Dan, Dec 10th, 2009 @ 7:22pm

    I watched it and it does look staged to me.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This