RSS
Twitter
Google Not Liable For 'Defamatory' Search Result Snippets In The UK
from the good-ruling dept
For many years there have been legal disputes over the way that Google shows a short "snippet" of a page in its search results. Some have charged that the results themselves may be libelous. In fact, in a bizarre recent Dutch court ruling, the site that such a snippet linked to was found liable, even though the problem was the way Google's algorithm constructed the snippet. So... of course, there are lawsuits against Google for its snippets as well. However, some good news out of the UK, as a court has found that Google should not be liable for search result snippets even if the content of the snippet is defamatory. The judge seems to clearly recognize that Google is just a search engine, and blaming it as if it were the publisher of such content makes no sense at all.
Reader Comments
(Flattened / Threaded)
I think if I get in an accident, say a drunk driver hits me, then since the town/city/state provide the roads I should sue the town/city/state.
That makes as much sense as suing Google or any other search engine for search results that catalog something that they did not create or even like or agree with. What next, suing God because a wild animal attacks a human and causes injury?
In my opinion we live in a society of wimps and idiots!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
"What next, suing God because a wild animal attacks a human and causes injury?" Way to bring god into an otherwise good eaxmple.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
If I were Google, I would simply drop anyone who complains about the search results from the index. They can get their traffic somewhere else. (I expect that they would soon come crawling back after realizing that a large portion of their traffic had just disappeared...)
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment