by Mike Masnick
Tue, Jul 14th 2009 12:34pm
Well, this is rather disappointing. Just days after caving in and agreeing to new webcaster rates that will harm pretty much everyone, Pandora has gotten right into bed with the RIAA/SoundExchange in supporting the Performance Right Act (the RIAA Bailout Act) to extend a similar unnecessary tax on radio. Pandora's reasoning is no surprise: basically it's saying that if it has to pay such a silly tax to help promote musicians, it's unfair that radio stations get away without paying something similar. But, still, it's disappointing. Rather than looking at adding value to the overall market, Pandora has basically decided that it's "enemy's enemy is a friend" and is supporting such a law simply because it will harm radio stations. This makes me think significantly less of Pandora.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Recording Industry Lobbyists Accuse Pandora Of Deliberately Not Selling Ads To Plead Poverty To Congress
- Welsh Radio Station Forced To Play Classical Music, English Songs After Royalty Talks Stall
- El-P To Radio: Let DJs Be DJs, And Stop Thinking Of Yourselves As Gatekeepers
- First Amendment Concerns About Internet Radio Bill Not Just Overblown But Completely Backwards
- Michael Robertson Continues To Tempt Copyright Fate With UberTalk: Recordable Radio Directory Online