Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1.  

   

   Anonymous Coward, Jul 10th, 2009 @ 2:11am

   
   

   Still though, compared to Cuomo's rants against Usenet and the like, this is almost sane.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2.  

   

   Anonymous Coward, Jul 10th, 2009 @ 2:27am

   
   

   Shouldn't we be abusing someone for not calling it "identity infringement?"

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

3.  

   

   Blatant Coward (profile), Jul 10th, 2009 @ 3:42am

   
   

   Facebook him Dano!

   Hm either he wants to start the charges big and reduce them to charges more reasonable later, or he's a politician looking for headlines.
   
   No, neither one of them make sense, he must think they are pirates and is trying to lull them into a false sense of security.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

4.  

   

   imfaral (profile), Jul 10th, 2009 @ 4:29am

   
   

   It's not identify theft

   just social engineering. While I am sure it was really annoying and obnoxious it wasn't identify theft.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

5.  

   

   Anonymous Coward, Jul 10th, 2009 @ 5:34am

   
   

   Is it trademark violation ? /s

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

6.  

   

   Anonymous Coward, Jul 10th, 2009 @ 5:44am

   
   

   People like that are the worst kind of idiot. People who sign up for stuff like that are the third worst kind of idiot (behind adults who still jam things up their noses).

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

7.  

   

   Robb Topolski (profile), Jul 10th, 2009 @ 6:52am

   
   

   How do we charge Andrew Cuomo with "issue theft?" He's created so many feel-good non-issues, usually resulting in needless restrictions our net freedoms rather than fighting any crime.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

8.  

   

   itchyfish, Jul 10th, 2009 @ 7:27am

   
   

   Maybe it is

   I could actually see how one could consider it "identity theft". If Tagged takes my address, which it sounds like they did from the article, and spams my friends using *my* email as the original sender, then yeah, I can see it. They've hijacked my address book and sent emails that are "from" me, recommending they join. You've hijacked my email service and represented yourself as me, that's identity theft. You didn't really cost me anything monetarily, but you *did* steal my identity, however briefly.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

9.  

   

   dieselm, Jul 10th, 2009 @ 7:38am

   
   

   I was on the receiving end of a wave of these. This was closer to phishing than to merely "deceptive practice".
   
   *Many* companies are loosey goosey about the way that they use your address book data (when given permission) and "encourage" you to "spam" your friends. Facebook at times, Zynga at times, etc. That would be deceptive and annoying. This is far beyond. The way Tagged did it, privacy invasion and identity theft actually characterizes the act well.
   
   Without permission, they misrepresent to get credentials, use those credentials to access your address book, spam friends pretending to be you, claiming to be sharing photos which are non-existent in order to induce your friends to click to repeat the process which results in (by their metric) a material gain for the company.
   
   If Techdirt asked me for a username and password for one reason and then gave it a whirl to see if they could access my gmail account and download my address book with it, I would call that privacy invasion. Foolish me for using the same credentials, but that doesn't give the company a reason to rifle through accounts on multiple other services. Using that information sending out unsolicited emails pretending to be me inducing others to do the same and furthermore, doing it en masse, charging them with identity fraud sounds right too.
   
   I'm more amazed the Attorney General was on the ball enough to notice this was different enough to file suit. Normally, I'd expect even this sort of egregiousness to fly completely under the radar.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

10.  

    

    Anonymous Coward, Jul 10th, 2009 @ 8:28am

    
    

    Linkedin

    They're deceptive and annoying, and companies that engage in them don't tend to last very long because no one really wants to use their service.
    
    Like Linkedin? I know someone who recently joined is this is precisely what Linkedin did. So you say they won't last very long and no one wants to use their service? We'll see.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

11.  

    

    Anonymous Coward, Jul 12th, 2009 @ 6:30am

    
    

    Tacking on attacks about privacy invasion and identity theft seems like bit much.
    
    Identity theft, no, but how can you deny invasion of privacy? It seems pretty clear cut in that respect.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

12.  

    

    tim@elementary-finance, Jul 17th, 2009 @ 7:41pm

    
    

    Fraud

    In my recent article, I talk about the fact that online credit card theft often results in 600 hours of work on the victim’s part to fix the damage. Amazing isn’t it? What could you have done in those 600 hours?

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

13.  

    

    kevin (profile), Apr 18th, 2011 @ 1:48am

    
    

    Making treatment with Avodart recommends both a decline in prostate size and lasting symptom development for up to 4 years. The smaller prostate gives less pressure on the urethra, which tends to treat inconvenient urinary symptoms. Wood Pelleting Plants

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

14.  

    

    Johnny, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 1:27am

    
    

    I have seen different people contact me with
    different names, different countries ,ages but
    Using the same person in pictures. Careful out there.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

15.  

    

    Jo Atua, Feb 22nd, 2012 @ 1:29pm

    
    

    ID Theft

    I am not sure of this - it is not really ID theft because they haven't actually used someone else's info, but have not been truthful of their intentions for the need for these people to contact their friends. Identity theft is when someone actually uses your identity obtained illegally - shred your documents, Office shredders are good for this

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment