Share/E-mail This Story

Email This



Student Found Guilty Of 'Disturbing The Peace' For Sending Nasty Political Email To Professor

from the wow dept

As we all know, online debates can spiral out of control pretty quickly -- with name calling and people quickly jumping to extremes. This is especially true in the political arena, where various positions are stereotyped and extreme passions come out quickly. I tend to find such discussions tiresome. However, they occur all the time (occasionally here in our own comments). But could you consider such a conversation disturbing the peace? It appears that's exactly what happened to a student in Nebraska who had a rather nasty political email exchange with a professor.

The student and the professor exchanged a series of emails over a short period of time. The two were at opposite ends of the political spectrum (which side was which, honestly, doesn't and shouldn't matter), and the student used some nasty language and accused the professor of being a traitor among other things. To be honest, if you've spent any time in online political discussions, this really isn't particularly out of the ordinary -- and (somewhat amazingly) after a back-and-forth exchange where the professor asked the student to stop emailing him and noting how insulted he was by the emails, the student did send a long apologetic email, telling the professor he was sorry that he got so riled up, and he really liked the professor and just wanted to debate someone intelligent who viewed the world from a very different perspective.

A few months went by, and then the professor received two anonymous emails from a new Yahoo email address that used the professor's name as part of the address (the username was "averylovesalqueda"), again ranting politically against the professor. The professor found the emails threatening and turned them over to the police. The police eventually tracked the emails down to the same student who was then charged with disturbing the peace. Yes. Disturbing the peace. For sending a nasty email.

First Amendment scholars look out. Who knew that sending a private ranting email could disturb the peace?

Amazingly, a lower court and now the appeals court agreed and the student has been convicted of disturbing the peace for sending those emails. The court even claims that the email address itself is libelous which seems quite difficult to square with reality. No one would look at that email address and assume that it was actually from the professor in question, and there's no indication that anyone outside of the professor himself ever saw the email address in question. O'Toole, in his post, puts the blame not on the judges, but on the student, who chose to defend himself, and appears to have done a pretty poor job of it, now leaving this ruling to be used as a citation in other cases. This is bad news no matter how you look at it. Even granting O'Toole's premise that the student is at fault for defending himself (and doing such a poor job of it), it's still bothersome that a judge wouldn't take basic First Amendment rights into consideration here.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    barren waste, Jun 18th, 2009 @ 12:20pm

    Disturbing the peace

    First of all, I would like to ask Mike to stop disturbing my peace. I was sitting here all peaceful like, thinking nothing , doing nothing, when this story forced itself open, grabbed me by my scalp and forced me to read it....wait.

    How can it be disturbing the peace when you can just hit delete. It isn't in your face screaming that you CANNOT ignore. Not only that, but only those who actively seek out this kind of arguement get sucked in. I get a ton of emails everyday spouting what I consider trash....thats why my email comes equipped with "mark all" and "delete all marked" options. I could be wrong, but I bet this professors email has very similar options. Maybe we should sue him for disturbing the peace. At least we would have a physical case against him, as he brought it out from private email to the general public, where those in that particular courtroom were exposed to it. Hey, kid who got sued, counter sue...your rights have been violated, your dignity has been violated, and if you cry hard enough maybe your lawyer will be able to make a case for other...violations..

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    chris (profile), Jun 18th, 2009 @ 12:33pm

    email is serious business

    this looks like a case of idiots colliding.

    first off, since when do people actually care about what happens via email?

    crazy email from some fool on the internet is nothing to get worked up about. same with forum comments. if someone sends you something incendiary, just forward it to a couple of friends and have a good laugh, or post it to the web where other people can have a good laugh at it, or just delete it. no good will come from caring what people say electronically.

    people on the internet aren't real. they don't have actual feelings that count for anything. honestly, if you show an ounce of human emotion on the internet you are begging for hassle and torment.

    and for the jackass that sent professor alqaeda the email, haven't you heard of anonymous remailers?

    you wouldn't make a crank phone call from your house (that's what burners and unsecured PBX's are for) so why would you send an email from a location that can be traced back you?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Mechwarrrior, Jun 18th, 2009 @ 12:42pm

    It would have been more plausible if the professor said he was being harassed. Of course, he could have just failed the student instead, for being a pretentious dilettante.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 18th, 2009 @ 12:51pm

    Has anyone heard of the new E-Mail extortion scandal? You get some E-Mail that says something to the extent of

    "Someone hired a hitman to kill you for $100. If you want to prevent this you have to pay him more. Send him $1000 and he won't kill you"

    lol

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    icon
    Robb Topolski (profile), Jun 18th, 2009 @ 12:57pm

    I read the case record...

    ... and it's quite extensive (and even entertaining).

    http://pub.bna.com/eclr/nebraska_v_drahota_061609.pdf

    Nebraska also has a 1989 case that extends "Disturbing the Peace" to include fighting words and the peace/tranquility of an individual (see http://www.legislature.ne.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=s2813022000) where other states might have a disorderly conduct, assault, threats, or harassment statute that covers that conduct.

    Fine $250 for being a dumbass and Prof. Avery just might deserve that "kick me" sign if he makes a habit of pressing cases like this.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    icon
    Overcast (profile), Jun 18th, 2009 @ 1:00pm

    Re: email is serious business

    this looks like a case of idiots colliding.

    Haha, that's awesome :)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    IdislikeLawyers, Jun 18th, 2009 @ 1:11pm

    Re: Disturbing the peace

    My outlook on this case is simple. Maybe you will disagree, but here it is anyway. If the Student had hired a lawyer he would have won. The reason for his loss is simple. Judges(really just lawyers that wear a dress), extremely dislike anyone, even another lawyer that represent themselves. They believe it makes a mockery of the legal system. they believe that so much that even if the self represented is in the right, they will find for the other side.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    Jim G., Jun 18th, 2009 @ 1:16pm

    I agree that "disturbing the peace" is a strange legal category for this particular issue. However, I notice that no one here is asking the question as to whether the contents were actually threatening or not. The actual content of the email is significant, not just that the rant was delivered via email. It's still illegal to call someone on the phone and threaten to kill them even though "they can just hang up."

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    icon
    Sailingmaster (profile), Jun 18th, 2009 @ 1:19pm

    It just goes to show. . .

    The Right to Free Speech has been superseded by the Right to be Offended. Take note.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    angry dude, Jun 18th, 2009 @ 1:28pm

    Disturbing The Piece of Shit

    Disturbing the piece of shit Al Qaeda lover by being patriotic? Shameful that people think that just loving freedom is disturbing the peace.

    All you idiots who think saying stuff online is harassment are a bunch of nose picking tards. "WAA WAA, somebody called me a name!"

    What a pathetic piece of shit you are.

    I wish Bush were back in office to send that Liberal Professor back to GitMo where he came from.

    Try to relax your collective sphincters, hippies, and take the freedom enema you so desperately need.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    barren waste, Jun 18th, 2009 @ 1:30pm

    Re:

    Well, I'm fairly certain that if there had been threats on the prof's life they would have come up in the article. It would no doubt have resulted in stiffer charges than disturbing the peace, and that would have negated the charge of the article. Responding legally to threats made over the internet is much different than responding to personally offensive material and arguementative students.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Danny, Jun 18th, 2009 @ 1:46pm

    too much we don't know

    There is too much here that we don't know.

    Perhaps one could make an argument for libel. Perhaps one could make an argument for harassment.

    Disturbing the peace makes no sense at all.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 18th, 2009 @ 2:11pm

    delete it or...

    Just delete the email or forward it to the whole middle east. Do you write letters these days? I don't think so.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    icon
    Dark Helmet (profile), Jun 18th, 2009 @ 2:13pm

    Re: Disturbing The Piece of Shit

    Ahem, punky:

    "Disturbing the piece of shit Al Qaeda lover by being patriotic?"

    Here's why that's a dumb statement, because even IF you agree with the substance of what he said (and from the legal brief I saw, I saw little political opinion and a lot of hateful vernacular), you wouldn't say he was JUST being patriotic. By the kids own admission he acted like a jackass, which is why he apologized for what he'd said. Regardless of which side of the aisle you come down on, you ought to be able to describe your philosophy without personally attacking the other person, otherwise you don't have a definable philosophy, only one defined by opposition.

    "All you idiots who think saying stuff online is harassment are a bunch of nose picking tards. "WAA WAA, somebody called me a name!""

    I 100% agree, you cock-smoking fucktard :)

    "I wish Bush were back in office to send that Liberal Professor back to GitMo where he came from."

    Finally, an admission that Bush abused and would continue to abuse Gitmo. Plus, if I'm reading the Appellate brief correctly, this professor became a Congressman during the course of the trial, or just before. So Bush would send a sitting Congressman to Gitmo because of what he thinks? Sadly, I think you're right. I just wouldn't want it to happen.

    "Try to relax your collective sphincters, hippies, and take the freedom enema you so desperately need."

    If you're trying to be ironic, that is one of the funniest things I've ever heard. If not, then it's just sad that you don't have any idea what freesom actually means.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    icon
    lux (profile), Jun 18th, 2009 @ 2:17pm

    Anyone surprised?

    Teachers abusing power because they feel threatened by their intellectual inferiority? No way!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    Kilgore Trout, Jun 18th, 2009 @ 2:18pm

    If they don't want the peace disturbed

    Why do they keep disturbing us?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 18th, 2009 @ 2:18pm

    (which side was which, honestly, doesn't and shouldn't matter)
    (the username was "averylovesalqueda")

    I kinda get who's on which side, though, and just based on username , side with the teacher...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    icon
    Stephen Downes (profile), Jun 18th, 2009 @ 2:46pm

    The original debate? No problem. The anonymous attack emails with the rude sender username? Harassment.

    The two cases should not be confused. And indeed, the presentation of the first case simply serves to prejudice discussion of the second.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    identicon
    madjack, Jun 18th, 2009 @ 2:52pm

    Libel In Email Address

    I've never been comfortable with claims of "disturbing the peace" as one person's threshold for peace may be quite low compared to another person's making it difficult to establish a reasonable standard. However, I am certain an email address can libel.

    If someone registered john.doe-is-a-pedophile@hotmail.com and e-mailed all the local schools and parks officials in his community without saying anything libelous in the body of the e-mail, I think Mr. Doe would be libeled, with the only defense being if it were true.

    In this case, if the professor was the only one to see it, maybe it's truly not even libel. However, something tells me the kid probably showed it to his friends. That would make him vulnerable to civil litigation, if not criminal prosecution for disturbing the peace.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    identicon
    Pongoriyobi, Jun 18th, 2009 @ 3:35pm

    Re: Re: Disturbing The Piece of Shit

    don't feed the trolls.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    identicon
    bob, Jun 18th, 2009 @ 3:43pm

    Stupid

    When dissing a liberal/commie/socialist/fascist Prof always go through 2 anonymous proxy servers.
    They can still find you but is makes it very manhour intensive.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    identicon
    angry dude, Jun 18th, 2009 @ 4:04pm

    Re: Re: Disturbing The Piece of Shit

    If you're trying to be ironic, that is one of the funniest things I've ever heard. If not, then it's just sad that you don't have any idea what freesom actually means.

    oh, I think I know what a "freesom" is...

    It's when 2 or more commie pinko hippie liberals get together and circle-jerk into each other's gaping pie-holes.

    That's what a Freesom is.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 18th, 2009 @ 4:53pm

    Scary

    Gotta watch those wing-nuts, they don't forget. You think they've moved on, but they haven't. They're just seething. And then one day, when you least expect it, wham!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24.  
    identicon
    CleverName, Jun 18th, 2009 @ 6:05pm

    Re: Re: Disturbing The Piece of Shit

    Damn - that's funny !

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  25.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 18th, 2009 @ 6:39pm

    Cyber intimidation is a real issue, it might be funny to those of us who let the crap roll off our backs like water off a duck, but for other people, it can cause issues.

    The student's comments would appear to be enough to make the teacher change his ways of doing things to avoid problems. That is intimidation, plain and simple.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  26.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 18th, 2009 @ 6:58pm

    Re: Re: Disturbing The Piece of Shit

    Dark Helmet - I don't know what a freesom is, but I am game to try anything.

    Angry Dude - If freedom involves putting anything up the ass I will have to pass... some gas

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  27.  
    identicon
    doubleshot, Jun 18th, 2009 @ 7:17pm

    avery

    Looks like this is the guy here:
    http://www.averyforlegislature.com/

    Bill’s devotion to teaching earned him numerous awards and teaching honors, including the Douglas Bereuter Distinguished Teaching Award for Undergraduate Instruction; Mortar Board Society Professor of the Month; four Certificates of Recognition for Contributions to Students; Beta Theta Pi Award for Excellence in Education; Who’s Who Among America’s Teachers; and two-time finalist for Educator of the Year by vote of student body at UNL. He also wrote or edited six books and 30 published articles.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  28.  
    identicon
    natefrog, Jun 18th, 2009 @ 7:45pm

    Content of e-mails

    Available @ http://pub.bna.com/eclr/nebraska_v_drahota_061609.pdf

    Excerpt:
    You can go f**k yourself if you are going to get that way. I’d kick your a** had you said that right in front of me, but YoU don’t have the guts to say that. If you think you do, just try me. . . We call you people turncoats. . .

    This wasn't just a simple "nasty e-mail." There were threats involved.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  29.  
    icon
    barrenwaste (profile), Jun 18th, 2009 @ 8:57pm

    In regards to the email

    Quite infantile, but hardly intimidating. I heard worse on the playground in elementary school. If that is enough to cause a person to change thier actions/views, then they truly are the cowards the words call them. I'm not defending the student, mind you, but this is hardly the kind of thing to lose sleep over. Put the kid in detention, slap a dunce hat on him, and get back to teaching. To take this kind of thing to court is not only a waste of our resources, but an admission of failure on the part of the school system. After all, a large part of public schooling is to teach people how to interact socially.

    Hmm, come to think of it, with those kind of role models and teachers it's no wonder that ninety percent of our youth is worthless.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  30.  
    identicon
    John Doe, Jun 19th, 2009 @ 4:24am

    Maybe he typed in all CAPS?

    MAYBE HE TYPE IN ALL CAPS AND THUS WAS SCREAMING AND THEREFORE DISTURBING THE PEACE?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  31.  
    identicon
    SunKing, Jun 19th, 2009 @ 7:28am

    This article got it wrong. The professor was in his kitchen at the time of reading the 'offending' email and was so startled that he knocked over some tins of processed food. The student was actually charged with "disturbing the peas".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  32.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 19th, 2009 @ 11:17am

    Re: In regards to the email

    I heard worse on the playground in elementary school.

    Yeah, kids often don't know any better than to do certain things. That's why we cut them a little more slack. As an adults, however, people are expected to know better.

    Put the kid in detention, slap a dunce hat on him, and get back to teaching.

    The person in this case is an adult. Please at least read the story before commenting on it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  33.  
    identicon
    Gene Cavanaugh, Jun 19th, 2009 @ 1:23pm

    Disturbing the peace with an email

    Knee-jerk reaction again, Mike.
    From the article, we don't have the foggiest idea if the email went ONLY to the professor, or was broadcast to the world - we don't know what else went into it, such as why the student went from apologetic to offensive.

    WE JUST DON'T KNOW enough to decide if this was a good decision, bad decision, or "in-between".

    Mike, you are an excellent journalist - don't descend into yellow journalism (as too many newspapers have)!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  34.  
    icon
    Almost Anonymous (profile), Jun 19th, 2009 @ 1:26pm

    Re: Libel In Email Address

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  35.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 19th, 2009 @ 11:11pm

    Re: Disturbing the peace with an email

    Mike, you are an excellent journalist... blah blah blah

    That's pretty good, considering he doesn't even claim to be a journalist at all.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This