RSS
New Bubble? Investing In Lawsuits
from the how-very-american dept
It's depressing, though perhaps not too surprising, to see how many readers have been sending in the NY Times story from this week about how some investors are dumping their money into lawsuits, with the idea of taking a piece of the profits. The article notes that a growing number of investors are doing this and that some see it as a "good investment during a recession" -- especially as various class action lawsuits have been springing up by people upset with the financial collapse and looking for parties to blame. Can you imagine investors who funded the real estate bubble now investing in the lawsuits over who's to blame for that bubble?
Of course, in many ways, many of the patent lawsuits by "non-practicing entities" (or as many prefer, "patent trolls") are exactly this as well. NTP, the company that stung RIM for $612.6 million over patents that the US PTO said were invalid was really just a bunch of investors, who all got to share in the "winnings," some of which they're now investing in more patent lawsuits. While the theory may be good, the problem is that it encourages bad lawsuits. One would hope that such investments wouldn't encourage such bad lawsuits because investors would rather invest in lawsuits that have a strong foundation, but that isn't always what we see. Since so much of these sorts of lawsuits (and certainly various class action lawsuits) feel like something of a crap shoot, what you end up getting is a case where these "investors" are better off "diversifying" across a bunch of questionable lawsuits, in the hopes that a few hit homeruns and pay off big time.
12 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Copyright Troll Submits Entire Filing About How 'Radical, Quasi-Anarchist' EFF Should Be Blocked From Participating In Case
- What Is Ron Paul Thinking? Sues To Unmask Anonymous Internet Users
- Max Mosley Sues Google For Unflattering Search Results -- Creating Even More Unflattering Search Results
- Famed Patent Troll Smacked Down Over 'Anonymous' Threat Letter
- Cisco Calls Out HP For Suing Former Employees Who Leave HP To Work For Cisco
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Idle hands are the devil’s….
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
No problemo
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
The Force Is not with Them
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
RE:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Oddly, there used to be laws against this
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: RE:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Damage
Would be better if we had more reasonable payouts.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Thanks for sharing!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Suits not frivolous.
Big companies are really complaining about lawsuits which have merit. They steal, get caught, and face large judgments because their theft is on a very large scale.
The companies doing most complaining are losing one lawsuit after another. They have much more money than any inventor and yet with that huge litigation advantage they still lose.
What does that tell you about their conduct?
RIM is a perfect example of this. They lost big. They appealed all the way to the Supreme Court and lost at every stage. The reason is simple, they lost because they were wrong. They lost because they were caught foisting manufactured evidence on the court. They lost because they tried to use political influence to sway the court.
When all that failed a massive PR campaign was used to distract people from the real reason RIM lost.
Virtually every member of the Coalition for Patent Fairness is guilty of the same sort of conduct.
Returning to the issue of costs. Small businesses are not being sued for patent infringement because it is not economical to sue for any infringement less than ten million dollars. In most cases it is not economical to sue unless the value of infringement is a hundred-million or more.
Any business with that kind of infringement is hardly small.
Why is TechDIRT being used to shill for companies stealing more than a hundred million dollars? Are they speaking on behalf of small business or on behalf of rather large businesses?
Ronald J. Riley,
Speaking only on my own behalf.
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (810) 597-0194 - (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 8 pm EST.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
fog
you're lost in a fog as usual. NTP backed the inventor who otherwise had no chance of benefiting from his invention. big corporate thieves don't like that...and neither do you. coincidence?
Call it what you will...patent hoarder, patent troll, non-practicing entity, etc. It all means one thing: “we’re using your invention and we’re not going to pay”.
please see http://www.piausa.org/ for a different/opposing view on patent reform
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment