France Continues Its Campaign To Pass The Worst Internet-Related Laws Around

from the who-can-keep-up? dept

Perhaps it's a race of some sort to see which country can pass the worst laws related to the internet possible, and France feels that it's falling behind other countries? After approving a "three strikes" law that will kick those accused (not convicted) of file sharing off the internet, someone in our comments reminded us that France is also looking to implement a file sharing tax on ISPs (Google translation) -- even though there's already such a levy on storage media. So... your connection gets taxed in case you're sharing music, your storage gets taxed again for that same shared music... and you can get kicked offline for it anyway.

And then a bunch of folks have pointed out that French politicians are looking to implement new laws that give police the ability to use keylogging software, force ISPs to censor certain sites on a "banned" list, and create a massive database of information on citizens. All of these things have appeared in other forms around the globe. All with great controversy. So it's quite impressive that France is trying to take them on all at once. Who knows if this latest bill will pass, but it really cements the idea that Sarkozy seriously dislikes the internet, and would like to put as many controls on it as possible.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    identicon
    Lucretious, May 20th, 2009 @ 6:25am

    It's France, does anyone expect less?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    UBW, May 20th, 2009 @ 6:27am

    They are simply trying to prove that all of these are bad ideas at once to prevent other nations from copying them. We should be thanking them for taking on this challenge.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 20th, 2009 @ 6:36am

    InternetPhobia or netphob

    Sarkozy and Michael Lynton have something in common

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    :Lobo Santo, May 20th, 2009 @ 6:37am

    Generational...

    This problem will die... it'll take the span of one or two generations though.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Tgeigs, May 20th, 2009 @ 6:37am

    It is indeed kind of enjoyable to watch the member countries of the EU, who banded together in order to compete with the Americas, subsequently shit all over themselves and their citizens. I mean, I get it, you guys want to to be socialist, which there's nothing wrong with, but why does that mean you have to piss on your constituents' feet?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 20th, 2009 @ 7:50am

      Re:

      I mean, I get it, you guys want to to be socialist, which there's nothing wrong with....

      Nothing wrong with being socialist? I think we've seen socialism to its extreme before, and that didn't work out so well. They were called NAZI's.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Kent, May 20th, 2009 @ 7:57am

        Re: Re:

        Yeah... to the extreme where it become something not truly socialistic. You're an idiot.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Tgeigs, May 20th, 2009 @ 8:41am

        Re: Re:

        "Nothing wrong with being socialist? I think we've seen socialism to its extreme before, and that didn't work out so well. They were called NAZI's"

        You seem to have two viewpoints.

        1. Socialism is wrong
        2. Extreme socialism resulted in the Nazi party

        Those two don't have much to do with one another. Extreme forms of any government tend to be counterproductive. Socialism is a perfectly acceptable form of government. If that's what the people want, that's what they should get.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, May 20th, 2009 @ 8:52am

        Re: Re:

        Arrgh my brain hurts.

        Extreme Conservatives are Nazis/fascists.
        Extreme Liberals are communists.

        Why do you think Hitler's Nazi army were trying to overthrow the current powers that be? It was to "go back to the good ol days" where you had only Aryans and clean ethnic races in control and not all these new comers. While they were all for technological progress their social progress was to stay at worst what it currently was, and at best what they think historically was the best through gestapo policing methods.


        What the hell does socialism have to do with any of this? If anything this is a highly conservative stance they are taking against new technologies since the internet challenges and changes the playing field for politics, economics, information, etc. So all of this change is BAD.

        I know there seems to be plenty of bashing against conservatives here but there is plenty of bad to be had with extreme liberal policies much like extreme conservative policies is bad.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, May 20th, 2009 @ 9:20am

        Re: Re:

        Nothing wrong with being socialist? I think we've seen socialism to its extreme before, and that didn't work out so well. They were called NAZI's.

        Actually, the Nazis were anti-socialist right wingers.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Tgeigs, May 20th, 2009 @ 9:43am

          Re: Re: Re:

          mmmm, not really. They were anti-COMMUNIST rightwingers, more than anything else at least.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, May 21st, 2009 @ 9:34am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            mmmm, not really.

            Yes, really. The fact that they were also anti-communist did not somehow make them pro-socialist by any means. The Nazi's were strong believers in survival of what they considered to be the fittest (e.g. Aryans) and believed that socialism only served to support those who were not fit to survive.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Tgeigs, May 21st, 2009 @ 10:12am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              Right but, interestingly, they supported Socialism WITHIN the Aryan race, which is why I said not really. Their chief platform in the 20's and 30's was Anti-Communism.

              But you're correct, as well. National Socialists would not support today's socialism.

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              •  
                identicon
                Anonymous Coward, May 21st, 2009 @ 4:46pm

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                National Socialists would not support today's socialism.

                They didn't support it in their day either. Don't confuse "national socialism" with "socialism" because of the semantic similarity of the names. "National socialism" referred to the belief that individuals had a social duty to support their national government. That was pretty much the opposite of "socialism" both then and today.

                 

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        chris g, May 20th, 2009 @ 11:40am

        Re: Re:

        now im one of the more conservative people in my group of friends but i must defend socilism from your claim. The objectionable policies of the nationalist-socialist party in germany had nothing to do with the ideology of socilism. A true socialist believes in the equality of all.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Jason, May 20th, 2009 @ 11:46am

        Re: Re:

        Point of correction: the Nazi's were fascists.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 20th, 2009 @ 10:06pm

      Re:

      Excuse me, but there is A LOT wrong with being socialist. It's a failed, inhumane, horribly ineffecient system compared with free enterprise and capitalism.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Azrael, May 21st, 2009 @ 12:26am

        Re: Re:

        Oh, and the free enterprise and capitalism is so successful that it needed to be rescued by a chinese communist regime from bankrupcy.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Tgeigs, May 21st, 2009 @ 6:24am

        Re: Re:

        "Excuse me, but there is A LOT wrong with being socialist. It's a failed, inhumane, horribly ineffecient system compared with free enterprise and capitalism."

        Riiiiiight. Well, now we get to play the definitions game, namely, how are you defining the following: capitalism, free enterprise, socialist, and failed.

        Most of Europe is socialist to one degree or another, and by most definitions I don't think you would define Europe as a "failed" state. We are also socialist in this country to a much lesser degree as well. FDA? Socialism. EPA? Socialism.

        So, unless you happen to be from or supporting supposed "free market" societies like South Africa (hey, there's a winner!), I can only guess that you're arguing about the DEGREE of socialism, despite the verbage of your comment.

        Unless of course you know of a successful capitalist, free market state that I'm ignorant of?

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Mike C., May 20th, 2009 @ 6:51am

    France surrenders again???

    Actually, I'm just beginning to think this is the inevitable direction that France would have to take. They are "under attack" from major media to "control piracy" and have "surrendered" to their demands... gotta keep the running joke alive somehow... right?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Another AC, May 20th, 2009 @ 6:51am

    Unfortunately it will not matter soon...

    Once ACTA is passed we will all be screwed anyway. I don't know why individual countries even bother with this at this point.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Ima Fish, May 20th, 2009 @ 7:05am

    "France is also looking to implement a file sharing tax on ISPs"

    I'm confused. If the file sharing tax is implemented you'd be paying for your P2P use. So why would it still be illegal to use P2P?!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 20th, 2009 @ 7:16am

    Re: #8

    So they can have their cake and eat it too, digest it and them crap the rest of it down our throats, while telling us it's for our own good.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    NullOp, May 20th, 2009 @ 7:20am

    France!

    Sounds like its time for another revolution to me! It also sounds like the French government does not know its internet from a hole-in-the-ground. AND the French government wants to tax you on that which they will fine you for and then kick you off the net so you can't get any more files for which they can tax you and then fine you...

    What the Hell, over

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Desertboy, May 20th, 2009 @ 7:21am

    French Internet Laws

    What a silly country. Maybe they should get that committee of French Architects who designed the new airpirt (that collapsed after completion) to design some really cool, French Internet Laws?

    It is SO NICE to have a different country be the International Laughingstock for a change.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 20th, 2009 @ 7:40am

      Re: French Internet Laws

      country != citizens

      Americans should be aware of that, of all people.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Tgeigs, May 20th, 2009 @ 7:47am

        Re: Re: French Internet Laws

        I completely agree, but we democratic people believe that it's YOUR responsibility to go kick your government's ass when they start acting like drunken inbred monkeys.

        Not that we always practice what we preach, but I'm just sayin...

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Ross Nicholson (profile), May 20th, 2009 @ 7:55am

    Glorious France is right.

    Lobbyists for thieves and pornographers here may decry valiant French and European efforts to protect copyright holders from wanton depredations, but the people of France and Europe and the west generally know that protecting intellectual property is in everyone's best interests. For instance, if left to the savage people of Saudi Arabia, pornographers would have their uh, well, something else cut off for infractions rather than paying a tax.
    The idea to tax blank media imposes burdens on law-abiding people, but the greatest burden is upon 'downlow' ders, streaming porn. Apple's system would seem to be preferred, but downloaders always go cut rate if they can.
    God bless the French Republic for trying and doing their best to uphold the values and the interests of all people everywhere.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Steven, May 20th, 2009 @ 8:05am

      Re: Glorious France is right.

      *Hunting desperately for the sarcasm tag...

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Tgeigs, May 20th, 2009 @ 8:54am

      Re: Glorious France is right.

      So...much....wrong....can't contain....hatred.

      "Lobbyists for thieves and pornographers here may decry valiant French and European efforts to protect copyright holders from wanton depredations"

      First of all, this isn't a children's book, so tone down the adjectives, you smelly wanton vile villainous jackass, they're distracting. Second of all, where are the lobbyists for thieves and pornographers? I tend to see lobbyless individuals being persecuted as thieves (which is an inherently incorrect characterization) against the lobbyist kings (RIAA, ASCAP, etc.). So where is "here"?

      "For instance, if left to the savage people of Saudi Arabia, pornographers would have their uh, well, something else cut off for infractions rather than paying a tax"

      Hello, my name is cultural tolerance and understanding that American values don't apply to every society on the planet. I don't think we've met.

      "The idea to tax blank media imposes burdens on law-abiding people, but the greatest burden is upon 'downlow' ders, streaming porn"

      Uh...what? Childish sentence structure aside, how does taxing blank media impose ANYTHING on people "streaming porn"? Do you know what streaming means? And how can taxing EVERYONE on blank media possibly put the greatest burden on a specific group? When you tax everyone blindly, you tax...you know...everyone...like....blindly.

      "God bless the French Republic for trying and doing their best to uphold the values and the interests of all people everywhere"

      No, God DAMN the French government for infringing on other people's basic rights and having ANYTHING to say about what goes on outside of their borders.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    TDR, May 20th, 2009 @ 8:44am

    Sounds like the French people may need to bring the ol' guillotine back out 'till their government gets its act together...

    [/humor]

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Jim, May 20th, 2009 @ 9:09am

    Download Tax

    The download tax is a bad idea, if combined with the ludicrous "three strikes" law; however, I think it's potentially a great idea, if combined with a law that makes ALL downloading legal. It's possibly the most realistic way to allow people to get all the downloads they want efficiently and at a low cost, and still ensure that rights holders will get paid for their work. Companies like BigChampaign already know what people are downloading. A service like that could be used to determine how much rights holders get paid (based on popularity).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Steven, May 20th, 2009 @ 9:45am

      Re: Download Tax

      except 'right holders' don't get paid for their work under these schemes. Collection services collect all this money and then just can't seem to find where it all needs to go, so they keep it.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Jim, May 20th, 2009 @ 2:38pm

        Re: Re: Download Tax

        "except 'right holders' don't get paid for their work under these schemes. Collection services collect all this money and then just can't seem to find where it all needs to go, so they keep it."

        Could you give me a real life example?

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Willynailer, May 20th, 2009 @ 9:50am

    Download Tax

    As for as trying to get all the other laws passed at the same time. It is a case of throwing everything at the wall and see what sticks.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    specnaz, May 20th, 2009 @ 11:02am

    Down here in Poland we got a entity called Kopipol. Basically it charges 1 up to 3% of value on digital media,
    such as cds,dvds, hard disks, pen drives -you name it.
    And all this "taxation" is in the name of crative communities, artists - but only those artists associated with collective societies.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    trollificus, May 20th, 2009 @ 2:47pm

    O rly?

    "Fascism IS the far right end of the spectrum, no?"

    Huh? Why would you say that? Besides knee-jerk response, having heard it said so many times before.

    See, you have all these little tags on the word "socialist"...and they are "progressive", "tolerant", "enlightened", "well-intnetioned"...clearly all the "good" and "right" things.

    And you have little tags on the Nazis..."evil", "murderous", "genocidal", "depraved" etc...clearly a whole bunch of bad things.

    But the tags represent value judgements that don't really work to aid comparison between the two. I propose that these tags, however accurate they may be, preclude your accurately assessing how much the Nazis actually had in common with those we, today, label socialist.

    After all, they (the Nazis) nationalized industries, which is a VERY socialist thing. And they tried to control political expression to make sure everything was "correct", also a very socialist thing. And they wanted to enroll all the "correct-thinking" people into service to the state, which is very, very, very, almost Obama-like, socialist. Also, they were very strong on gun control, a position most socialists support. They were anti-smoking, believed in vegetarianism, mysticism and perfect health and fitness...you recognize any of that?

    No, once you move past the labels, it's clear the Nazis had a lot in common with today's socialists.

    Starting with top-down control of other people's lives. (and there's nothing much different there than the real right-wingers, I'll admit.)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Tgeigs, May 20th, 2009 @ 3:02pm

      Re: O rly?

      "Huh? Why would you say that? Besides knee-jerk response, having heard it said so many times before"

      -According to the simplest left-right axis, communism and socialism are usually regarded internationally as being on the left, opposite fascism and conservatism on the right- from the Wiki article on the political spectrum...

      So, in addition to hearing it poli/sci classes in college...yeah, kind of. When it's the generally accepted view, I suppose lots of people say it.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 20th, 2009 @ 5:46pm

      Re: O rly?

      citations ?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    trollificus, May 20th, 2009 @ 3:04pm

    dichotomies

    Virginia Postrel has proposed a much more useful dichotomy...between 'stasist' and 'dynamist' viewpoints.

    It goes a long way towards explaining the strange bedfellows we seen opposing NAFTA and genetically-engineered products, luddites and technocrats, sleeping together, mass hysteria!!

    Ghostbuster refs aside, I won't go into a long explication, but rather recommend her book "The Future and Its Enemies".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    trollificus, May 20th, 2009 @ 3:16pm

    well, you have to admit it requires a lot of unsatisfactory and awkward mental gymnastics to make every political position fit along that "simplest axis".

    When I read Postrel's book, I thought it provided original and amazingly useful alternative axes to such thinking.

    Your mileage may vary, especially if you have vested any self-esteem in being on the "good" political side.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    PrometheeFeu (profile), May 21st, 2009 @ 7:45am

    To be fair

    To be fair, when your Internet connection is cut off, you still have to pay for it. (And of course the tax if it gets passed)

    Though the most amusing thing is that the 3-strike law has an interesting loophole where if you have a government approved bug setup, (most likely software it seems) you are considered to have your Internet connection "secured" and are immune from the 3-strike law. (Basically, it is assumed that someone went out and hacked the government bug and then downloaded with your Internet connection) Now, I don't know how many of you have a background in computer security, but the idea that you can create such a system such that a competent person cannot hack it and bypass it while it still looking like it works fine is ridiculous.

    Oh, also, the government bug will not be free, (let's make people pay for the device that spies on their private communication) and there is no provision for incompatible OSs. (Who said anti-trust?)

    To the attention of the socialist debate:
    The US is a socialist state. Medicare, social security, medicaid, unemployment benefits, free education etc... Get over it. It's not that bad as long as you are smart about it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Nelson Cruz (profile), May 21st, 2009 @ 9:24am

    Calm down, it's not gonna happen!

    This idea of a file sharing tax, which they called "global license" or "cultural license" was actually defended by the opposition (socialist party) in the parliament as an ALTERNATIVE to the 3 strikes law, and strongly rejected by Sarkozy's government.

    So this is not gonna happen. At least not until 3 strikes fails miserably and/or the socialists rise to power in France again.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    PrometheeFeu (profile), May 21st, 2009 @ 10:41am

    Socialists are not NAZIs

    OK, the first guy to have called socialists NAZIs gets a Godwin Point. Also, just to set the record straight, while the NAZI party did support some aspects of socialism, the implication that NAZI=socialist is demonstrative of a lack of historical understanding and political awareness. Some fascists supported some aspects of capitalism. I don't suppose many of you here would argue that because you defend the free market, you also support killing off the opposition. (At least I hope) Similarly, there are people who support government services without supporting killing the Jews.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Sir Prank-a-chiff, May 26th, 2009 @ 12:01pm

    " What luck for rulers that men do not think. "

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Mihat Micoat, Jan 23rd, 2011 @ 8:03am

    France and the Internet

    The biggest problem with the internet in France is that French Telecom have a monolopy. It doesn't matter what company you are with, they all use FT lines. Once you are out of the cities, you pay the same for 128/512 kbs as you would for 20 megs in the big cities. Total rip off!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This