New FTC Chair's Views On Google, Broadband Competition And Behavioral Advertising

from the sounds-decent-so-far... dept

We've been receiving a series of different reports from different folks about a recent interview that new FTC boss, Jon Leibowitz, gave on CSPAN. Leibowitz has been in the FTC for a while, though, he's yet another former entertainment industry lobbyist in the administration (he was VP of Congressional Affairs for the MPAA from 2000 to 2004). So far, however, he seems to be taking quite reasonable positions on a variety of topics (though, some questionable views on other areas). Questioned about Google's dominance in the market (something that the FTC has been investigating for a while now), he pointed out that dominance is "the American way" and not necessarily an antitrust violation:
Google has certainly has a dominant position in search advertising. There's no doubt about that. From our perspective, just having a dominant position doesn't in any way violate the law. It's if you do something -- as the Justice Department in the 1990s alleged that Microsoft did -- to exclude competitors illegally, that's when it becomes a problem.

If you get to a dominant position or a monopoly position by virtue of your own acumen, that's really the American way.
Then there's broadband competition, where he definitely does appear to be concerned about the lack of competition and the lack of transparency from current broadband providers:
We believe consumers need to have notice and consent about what they're getting. It's very, very important that these providers tell consumers about the speed they're getting, and whether (ISPs) are making any types of management decisions in terms of the network that affect consumers....

In a perfect marketplace where you had more competitors, you wouldn't need the government necessarily to be terribly involved. Particularly in the consumer protection area, we have a big roll to play. Broadband is a deregulated product. That's good, we like deregulation generally. But when you have deregulation, you also have law enforcement to make sure people do the right thing.
And, then, there's the question of behavioral advertising, where he believes that opt-in, rather than opt-out, makes a lot of sense:
I think some of the more enlightened companies do do opt-in. I think a lot of them don't. I think the better practice is always opt in.
On the whole, then, he seems to not be too quick to bash companies for being successful, and seems to recognize that competition and transparency are important issues. Those are all good things. There are some fears however, that he's a bit quick on the trigger when it comes to regulating over that behavioral advertising issue, and doesn't seem to mind metered broadband, so long as customers know what they're getting.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    IanK, May 14th, 2009 @ 8:18pm

    What's the point of this story. Another brain fart?

    Ok, all this means is that you agree on some points, and disagree on others. Wow. Welcome to Earth.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Luci, May 14th, 2009 @ 8:45pm

    Re:

    Welcome to Techdirt, where we like to DISCUSS the issues instead of asking what they're about. I'm sorry, but that means you need to read what's posted, maybe follow some links, and then begin or add to meaningful dialog.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Paul`, May 14th, 2009 @ 8:56pm

    "and doesn't seem to mind metered broadband, so long as customers know what they're getting. " What is the problem with this?

    An internet connection isn't a god given right, and so long as ISP's advertise their products truthfully then you get what you sign up for.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    William, May 14th, 2009 @ 9:16pm

    Re:

    I would agree with that, if there was more competition. But currently in many places were only one service provider is available, then the customer should have the option of 'unlimited internet.'

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    YouAreWrong, May 14th, 2009 @ 9:42pm

    I'm happy for the new AG

    Other than Google's treatment of a handful of publishers with adsense accounts, I have yet to hear of them do anything that's predatory. Hell, when you search on their page, THEY EVEN DIRECTLY LINK TO COMPETITORS at the top of the page in a very prominent position, just so you can see how much better Google's results are. I love Google, and I support them.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Matt, May 14th, 2009 @ 10:38pm

    eh, step in the right direction

    overall from your summary sounds like its a good start towards progress with this guy at least.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    icon
    Mike (profile), May 14th, 2009 @ 10:51pm

    Re:

    What's the point of this story. Another brain fart?

    The FTC has massive regulatory control over a number of issues impacting tech. I figured a lot of people might be interested in what the guy had to say...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    icon
    Mike (profile), May 14th, 2009 @ 10:53pm

    Re:

    An internet connection isn't a god given right, and so long as ISP's advertise their products truthfully then you get what you sign up for.

    I'd agree... except for the fact that thanks to regulations and gov't subsidies, it's not a private issue. The companies have relied on gov't money and support and rights of way to build their network with little competition. That gives them an unfair advantage to then do bad things with the network.

    If there were actual competition, it wouldn't be an issue.

    But there isn't... in part due to gov't activity. Thus, this is a space where unfettered abuse of their position should in fact be monitored by the gov't.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Paul Kersey, May 15th, 2009 @ 3:46am

    Oh man, I can't resist. I've seen this twice this week now.

    roll = wrapping around, like a "cinnamon roll"
    role = a part in something, i.e. a "role to play"

    tisk tisk

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Jake, May 15th, 2009 @ 5:21am

    Re:

    I'd go one step further and say that natural monopolies belong under government control; if you're not satisfied with their performance you can vote for someone else, but a fat lot of real choice you get from three or four resellers buying from the same wholesaler.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Steven, May 15th, 2009 @ 1:28pm

    "Broadband is a deregulated product. "

    This is only part that really seemed really wrong to me.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2009 @ 3:02pm

    Re: Re:

    at a cost set by who or what?

    Is it the government's job to force a company to deliver a certain product?

    Why doesn't the consumer move somewhere else? Somewhere that *has* the services they want?

    You can't go into Burger King, order a Big Mac, and expect to get one. Then, demand the government force Burger King to sell you one.

    In the case you're describing, the government needs to tune the regulations and incentives, to make sure that profitable competition is possible in the market.

    If there's money to be made, someone will step in to make it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Edward Izzys, Jun 4th, 2009 @ 8:30am

    Interesting!

    In the past, offline media was one of the major mediums to promote one’s business and brand awareness. However, with the increasing popularity of the online media and its positive results, more people are turning to online marketing techniques to build a strong business presence across the globe. There are several online marketing strategies we can use for our Internet marketing solutions, but SEO (search engine optimization) today has taken a stance much ahead of any other technique.

    SEO brings with it tremendous scope for business improvement with improved keyword positioning, improved ranking and overall increase in the ROI and cuts down on the PPC cost extensively in the long run. This is a proven marketing solution if done the right way using the right techniques based on your website requirements.

    I thought this information would be helpful for those who wish to promote their website and get great results.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This