Yahoo Removing Your Stock Board Comments Is Not A Violation Of Your First Amendment Rights
from the freedom-to-post? dept
Eric Goldman points us to the latest silly lawsuit against Yahoo. This time, it's a guy who posted a bunch of comments on various stock forums, and when Yahoo appears to have canceled his account, he sued the company for violating his First Amendment rights. You can read the full lawsuit below:
11 Comments | Leave a Comment..
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- One Reason Why The USPTO Granted Ridiculously Stupid Internet Patents: Patent Examiners Were Banned From Using The Internet
- The Web Is Saved: East Texas Jury Says Eolas Patents Are Invalid
- MPAA Uses Anon Attacks To Make Nonsensical Comments About Free Speech
- Supreme Court Chooses SOPA/PIPA Protest Day To Give A Giant Middle Finger To The Public Domain
- Senator Wyden Demands Answers About Feds' Seizure Of Dajaz1





Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Huh?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
duh?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: duh?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
If the courts think this person is wasting their time they can say so .... what exactly is your point ?!!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Will he win, that depends
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
"I'm American. I respect the Bill of Rights. Freedom of Speech is one of the greatest parts of being American. That being said, you have no rights in here, whatsoever."
Private companies can do what they want with their property. Yahoo can take down any comments they want and block whoever they want for basically whatever reason they want. They won't win awards for overusing the power, and using it too much will probably get some negative publicity, but it's their right. Same as the way newspapers aren't legally obligated to publish letters you send in to them; it's not a violation of your rights, it's an enforcement of theirs.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
unrelated tangent: if it's a spoken untruth it's slander; if it's a written untruth, it's NOT slander, it's libel.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Free speech is vs the government, not vs. private property
Accusing someone of a crime or unethical act with no evidence to back it up is indeed a good reason for an admin to ban your account, and it appears that's what happened here.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment