No, Guitar Hero Doesn't Infringe On Gibson's Patent
from the good-news dept
Last year, we wrote about yet another highly questionable patent lawsuit, involving famed guitar-maker, Gibson, claiming that Activision and pretty much every retailer who sold Guitar Hero violated its patent on "generating and controlling a simulated musical concert." The whole thing seemed pretty ridiculous (the patent itself seemed to describe something entirely different from what happens in Guitar Hero.
It took almost a year, but Colin Ross points out that, earlier this year, a California court didn't just toss out the lawsuit against Activision, but told Gibson that the lawsuit "bordered on the frivolous." This was especially true of Gibson's claim (I kid you not) that "the '405 Patent covers any system where a user controls something 'musical' with any device." Yes, really. The court wasted little time smacking down that idea:
It took almost a year, but Colin Ross points out that, earlier this year, a California court didn't just toss out the lawsuit against Activision, but told Gibson that the lawsuit "bordered on the frivolous." This was especially true of Gibson's claim (I kid you not) that "the '405 Patent covers any system where a user controls something 'musical' with any device." Yes, really. The court wasted little time smacking down that idea:
By arguing that any sound made by any controller can potentially be musical, Gibson would have everything in the world -- from the buttons of a DVD remote, to a pencil tapping a table -- be an 'actual musical instrument' within the '405 Patent....The lawsuits against the retailers and other companies associated with the game are still ongoing, but hopefully will be tossed out on similar grounds shortly.
No reasonable person of ordinary skill in the relevant arts would interpret the '405 Patent as covering interactive video games.






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Except
"What do you call ten thousand lawyers buried up to their neck in sand? Not enough sand."
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
I know the guy
Now get this. I talked about this issue with him when he mentioned it. Even HE doesn't seem to feel that Guitar Hero and similar games infringe on the patent. Although, from what I hear from other people who have worked at Gibson, the owner of the place is pretty freaking nuts. It really doesn't sound like a very good place to work to me.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
First Guitar Purchase
Instead of suing them, Gibson should be thanking the makers of GH for making guitars more widely desired.
But, lawyers gots to get paid.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Yeah, sad... kinda like Neil Young ;).
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment