RSS
EC's Latest Rules Govern Its Coffee Machines
from the politicians dept
The European government's penchant for regulation is well-documented: its generally fruitless battles against Google and Microsoft are but two examples. Now, though, it's taking on the really serious stuff: the quality of the espresso in the European Commission's offices. The NYT says the EC bought 21 high-tech coffee machines at 5,000 euros each for its headquarters, "as a perk to keep top officials and visiting dignitaries from having to line up in cafes on other floors of the star-shaped Berlaymont Building." The big bill attracted criticism as another example of wasteful spending, but a bigger problem emerged for Commission employees -- the coffee didn't taste good. The Italian company that made the machines plans to replace them with some modifications (apparently water softeners in the coffeemakers were partly to blame), and it will also train "coffee monitors" in "coffee tasting theory and sensorial techniques," "recipes and hints," and "ordinary machine maintenance procedures." I'm not sure if it's heartening or frustrating to learn that bureaucrats' penchant for wasting time, money and other resources is pretty much the same the world over.
18 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Cybersecurity Bill Backers Insist This Isn't SOPA... But Is It Needed?
- Mass Protests Against ACTA All Across Europe
- It's Time To Let Politicians Know That Using Secretive Trade Agreements To Meddle With The Internet Is Unacceptable
- 'The Economist' And 'Financial Times' Already Writing Off ACTA As Dead
- Watch Out: Widespread Protests Against ACTA Spreading Across Europe
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Espress Yourself
Alton Brown did a great analysis on his show "Good Eats" on this topic, back in 2007. The episode was called "Espress Yourself" (Episode ID: EA1018H).
In 1/2 hour, this Proud American explains the secrets and four parts to making a great Italian Espresso.
La Miscela, La Macinazione, La Macchina, and La Mano.
If you watch only one episode of "Good Eats" make this the one.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
If the Italian company was a Haliburton subsidiary you wouldn't wouldn't be writing this smart ass nonsense.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
The History of Europe
The difference in bureaucratic stupidity seems to be negligible except for the scale. European bureaucrats waste 105,000 Euros on coffee. American bureaucrats ignore banking misconduct and bring down the World's economy. USA! USA! We're number one!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
....................................,.-'"...................``~.,
.............................,.-"..................................."-.,
.........................,/...............................................":,
.....................,?......................................................,
.................../...........................................................,}
................./......................................................,:`^`..}
.............../...................................................,:"........./
..............?.....__.........................................:`.........../
............./__.(....."~-,_..............................,:`........../
.........../(_...."~,_........"~,_....................,:`........_/
..........{.._$;_......"=,_......."-,_.......,.-~-,},.~";/....}
...........((.....*~_......."=-._......";,,./`..../"............../
...,,,___.`~,......"~.,....................`.....}............../
............(....`=-,,.......`........................(......;_,,-"
............/.`~,......`-...................................../
.............`~.*-,.....................................|,./.....,__
,,_..........}.>-._...................................|..............`=~-,
.....`=~-,__......`,.................................
...................`=~-,,.,...............................
................................`:,,...........................`..............__
.....................................`=-,...................,%`>--==``
........................................_..........._,-%.......`
...................................,
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I'm optimistic
We should confine them to regulating everything in the building: stairs, elevators, the wall paint...
That way they will be too busy to regulate away the individual.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Government versus Industry
I believe the point being made here is that taxpayers are paying for these (pardon the pun) perks.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
...the ridiculous get ridiculouser (yeah, I know it's not a word)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Enabling you to do stupid things faster
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
However, their ability to spend money this stupidly = bad.
Damn! They equaled themselves out to nothing more than zeros again.
Expensive zeros, but zeros none-the-less.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
perks? Ha! I get it!
Wait!
Having to make do with coffee produced in a pot costing LESS THAN $5,000 constitutes "suffering"???
Were you also sympathetic to hedge fund operators whose bonuses were decreased from 8 figures to 7 JUST BECAUSE THEY LOST MONEY FOR THEIR INVESTORS?? Why should they have to suffer??
You must be the kind of person* who believes campaign reform that "gets big money out of elections" is done for a purpose other than increasing the current 95% re-election rate of incumbents. Why should incumbents have to suffer the inconvenience of uppity challengers?
Jebus. This country is going to die of Cynicism Deficiency.
*-i.e.: a sucker
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Correction...not.
Somehow, I did not think calculating out the exact number would have improved the post.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Formed comittee to determine whether the "training" in good coffee making and appreciation should be handled by the EU Education Department or the EU Consumer Affairs Department. Result: Members of both departments would hash out shared responsibility at a conference held in a Columbian resort.
Formed committee to choose outside consulting firm to develop, test and administer "Coffee Education" course.
Result: Outside firm belonging to partner of committee member chosen. Consulting firm then hired members of committee as contract agents to actually do the work.Hands on all sides well-washed, backs well-scratched.
Consulted legal department about whether damages could be sought against Italian coffe-maker company.
Result: After meeting in resort city somewhat near coffee-maker factory and many, many hours of "work", legal reports "No."
Committee formed to mandate coffee quality across the EU, and penalties for advocating use of inferior coffee, coffee brewing devices and non-approved holding/dispensing devices (coffee cups).
Result: 5,000-page report issued favoring coffees from countries amenable to EU foreign policy, brewers produced by companies employing the most generous lobbyists and banning use of "I [heart] XXXX" and "World's Greatest XXXX" forumlations on coffee mugs as "resisting American cultural imperialism".
I may have gotten a detail wrong here and there, but...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
follow up on above.
But they should be back from Cannes any day...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Public vs Private Waste
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re; Public vs Private Waste
This type of waste is reserved for government beuracracies, where the price tag never matters. Why would it? What happens to them if they waste too much money? Will there be some sort of cosequence? They can't go out of business that's reserved for, well, business.
If some company spends this much on coffee machines, who cares? It's their money, if it's a bad investment, it's their loss. What's it to you?
If it's your taxpayer money, though, you might want it spent slightly less frivolously.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment