Are Breach Notification Laws Anything More Than Window Dressing?

from the fresh-paint-on-an-eyesore dept

Given how often credit-card data is leaked from retailers, payment processors or banks, most of us are familiar with the breach-notification letters card issuers send out -- and many of us probably don't pay a whole lot of attention to them, since they're often followed by a new card for us to start using. These notifications are required in many states by law, but they've become so common, and provide so little useful information, that some people wonder if they serve any use at all. Yes, argues another blogger, mainly because he says the notifications provide consumers with information regarding the source of the breach, giving them extra warning to change any other card number they've used there, or the opportunity to no longer patronize a particular business. But is that really the case? In my experience, the breach notifications I've received have never provided any specific information about the source of a breach, and neither banks or credit-card companies have ever been willing to disclose a source. And if the breach occurs at a company like a payment processor, with which consumers have no direct contact, they can't take their business elsewhere. For consumers, the notifications themselves may not help much, but they do have value in forcing companies that have lost data to disclose it to other players in the ecosystem. But the big risk of the notifications is if they're viewed as a security solution in and of themselves, such as if thinking that the shame of having to disclose a breach will guilt companies into better security. That hasn't worked, as the breaches continue unabated, so it's high time to find some new and effective solutions.

6 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    Good ol' cash could be making a comeback!

    identicon
    R. Miles, Mar 12th, 2009 @ 4:07am

    That hasn't worked, as the breaches continue unabated, so it's high time to find some new and effective solutions.
    After reading the story of the group who successfully cracked the encryption using several PlayStation 3 consoles, I've pretty much given up hope on any "effective" solution.

    All solutions will break, in time. It's a constant cat & mouse game, and one day, it'll reach an impasse. I'm sure the costs to continue developing new solutions is taking its toll, especially on the consumer who ends up paying for it in the long run.

    Cards are convenient, but I see a day when cash begins to make a comeback for local purchases as consumer trust in electronic transactions diminishes. How many times do you think consumers will tolerate having to receive new cards on every breach? They'll tire of it eventually.

    Meh. What can anyone do.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    It's no big deal

    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 12th, 2009 @ 6:22am

    until someone with influence is affected - then let the whining begin.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    Another Marketing Ploy

    icon
    Steve R. (profile), Mar 12th, 2009 @ 6:48am

    When we receive these notices, we also get in the mail the sales pitch for signing-up for "identity theft protection". I have also gotten phone calls, that I assume are related to marketing the identity theft protection product. I didn't answer the phone, but got the vague voice mail requesting a call back concerning an "issue".

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  

    Proper Punishment

    identicon
    TheStuipdOne, Mar 12th, 2009 @ 7:48am

    It seems logical to me that if a company loses my credit card information then they need to be punished and I need to be compensated. So they should be forced to pay off ALL the debt on ALL the cards they lost info on, and cover all the bank's costs in replacing the cards.

    To be honest not that much money for me cause I keep mine payed off, but that can be $10,000 or more for some people. If I assume an average of $500 per card and 60,000 lost cards we are talking 30 million dollars. A slap on the wrist to some big companies but definitely worth improving security.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  

    notifications no longer useful

    identicon
    Man from Atlanta, Mar 12th, 2009 @ 8:53am

    I worked on a few breach responses over the last few years. When notification laws first came out, notifications were useful. Execs took their duties seriously. Recipients responded and reviewed their credit reports, wrote letters, etc. There was a reaction.

    But even as long ago as two years ago, the public became too used to the notices. They became commonplace. As responders, we watched this and knew our responses were becoming less important.

    The content of notices changed too, they became less useful. Companies figured out that the lessening furor did not require offering cheap credit monitoring, so they stopped offering it. Notification became a nuisance, not a moral duty. Steve R. is right, some businesses also began trying to turn breaches into profitable events!

    Notification is no longer the guilt-tinged mea culpa it used to be. The notification laws no longer perform their intended function.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  

    Re: Proper Punishment

    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 12th, 2009 @ 11:08am

    no, I think there should be fines, but that is a bit prohibitive to smaller companies and could also wrongfully punish an unavoidable breach.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This