Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1.  

   

   Anonymous Coward, Mar 6th, 2009 @ 4:14pm

   
   

   True dat man.. Tru dat..

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2.  

   Proxies anyone?

   

   Undumb criminal, Mar 6th, 2009 @ 4:54pm

   
   

   Um, anyone with half a brain that knows they are posting self-incriminating evidence or is committing a crime knows that they should be doing such over a high-anonymity proxy from outside of the country. I guess these guys don't have half a brain.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

3.  

   Re: Proxies anyone?

   

   Anonymous Coward, Mar 6th, 2009 @ 5:02pm

   
   

   Because that totally hides your face on the camera while you do something illegal.
   
   Moron.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

4.  

   Re: Re: Proxies anyone?

   

   LOL, Mar 6th, 2009 @ 5:25pm

   
   

   Huh, how will they know your name from your face.
   
   I guess in this special case they would know cuz he's already a felon.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

5.  

   A Federal Case

   

   Anonymous Coward, Mar 6th, 2009 @ 5:42pm

   
   

   Not only was the gun unregistered, but it was manufactured outside the state, making it a federal offense.
   
   I wouldn't have thought that would make it a federal case. If someone commits a crime using a vehicle manufactured outside the state, does that make it a federal case?

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

6.  

   I'm assuming ATF would be involved?

   

   Anonymous Coward, Mar 7th, 2009 @ 12:26am

   
   

   Transporting unlicensed firearms across state lines? my best guess.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

7.  

   True dat man.. Tru dat..

   

   Oldfart from Wisconsin, Mar 7th, 2009 @ 4:48am

   
   

   It is fairly safe to assume that the miscreant spoke in such a manner.
   By the way, is that supposed to be English??

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

8.  

   cant blame youtube

   

   LtJackboot, Mar 7th, 2009 @ 8:42am

   
   

   If you're gonna tell the whole freakin' world about your crimes you're gonna get caught.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

9.  

   

   Joe, Mar 8th, 2009 @ 4:12pm

   
   

   Most states, including Virginia, do not require guns to be registered. Not even gun-hostile New Jersey requires registration of firearms.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

10.  

    Re:

    

    boost, Mar 9th, 2009 @ 10:28am

    
    

    Hand guns must be registered in most states.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

11.  

    Re: A Federal Case

    

    Anonymous Coward, Mar 9th, 2009 @ 11:07am

    
    

    Yeah I wondered about that one too - is that specific to firearms . . . seems a little rediculous

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

12.  

    Re: Re:

    

    BTR1701, Mar 10th, 2009 @ 6:34am

    
    

    > Hand guns must be registered in most states.
    
    Only to carry them. Mere ownership of them doesn't require registration except in a handful of states. Certainly not "most" states.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment