RSS
Twitter
Politician Recognizes That Students Deserve Free Speech Rights Too
from the free-speech-is-good dept
There have been a number of cases recently concerning students getting punished for writing mean things about teachers or school administrators on social networking sites or blogs. In the past, there was a pretty clear legal line in terms of what was and what was not allowed: if the speech took place on campus, the school had the right to do something about it. If it took place off campus, it was the student's free speech rights. However, some courts have begun to change that bright line, by saying that since internet sites can be reached from the school, schools now have the right to punish students for things they say online. This has numerous troubling implications when it comes to basic free speech.
Amazingly, there appear to be some politicians who actually recognize this. Up in Connecticut, where a 16-year-old girl was disciplined for calling school administrators "douche bags" on her blog, state Senator Gary LeBeau is actually proposing a law that would protect student free speech in such cases. Even more impressive, LeBeau was a teacher for 35-years, so he certainly understands where teachers and administrators are coming from -- but he says that the free speech issue is more important. He says that it's not right that a school should be able to interfere with a student's conversations. Not surprisingly, the National School Boards Association is fighting against the bill, and it would be surprising if it got enough support to pass -- but it's nice to know at least one politician out there recognizes a student's right to speak their mind from home.
Reader Comments
(Flattened / Threaded)
I wish those sites had existed when I was in high school. I probably would have been disciplined all the time, with the things I had to say about some of my teachers and administration.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Cool
I agree, it's about time. Let's buy this guy a cup of coffee!!!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
As the father of a 16 year old, it is my opinion that the limits of his speech are established, primarily, by me. Until he is legally an adult, his actions, especially those that don't violate the law, are my responsibility, unless I have authorized another entity to deal with them. If he says or does something that violates the school's rules while he is in their care (ie. at school) then they have some recourse. If my son does something outside of school, the school has no responsibility, no authority, and therefore no recourse. It is my job to appropriately discipline him for actions such as those done by the girl in Conneticut, not the school's or the state's.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
If your views were in the majority, we'd have many fewer moronic lawmakers trying to act like it's their job to raise our kids.
I have a friend who is a teacher, and there are plenty of parents who really do think it is the school's job to teach character and morals so the parents don't have to.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
its about time
wow, great job Senator LeBeau !
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Free Speech = Free Speech (except when it's not?)
Why does it matter where a student is if they choose to comment on their educators? Since when is it not permissible to have an opinion about others?
Granted, there is a line between opinion and libel, but this is not exactly a person screaming "Fire!" in a crowded theater. At what point do we become hypocritical about being such a free and open country where innovation and new thought are rewarded when we have to adopt a form of McCarthyism to keep some kind of theoretical internet order in our schools? (Are you no longer a blogger about your professors?)
Educators are there to educate. It is of no consequence what students think about these individuals if they are learning and performing. I have had many teachers that I would have written nasty and/or funny things about online, and the ones that would've been derided the worst were probably my best and most inspiring professors.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Free Speech = Free Speech (except when it's not?)
I almost see your point Erik but if I go to court and continually refer to the judge as Douche Bag, I'm getting contempt and spending some time in jail.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Free Speech = Free Speech (except when it's not?)
If you refer to the judge as a douchebag when you're not in the courtroom? I hope there would be no consequences for that, but if there are do you think that would be appropriate? If so, why? If not, why is the situation with a school different?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Free Speech = Free Speech (except when it's not?)
Just as you would be punished if you were in school and started talking shit about the teachers. You can talk shit about the judge outside of the courtroom and... oh well.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Free Speech = Free Speech (except when it's not?)
Yes, anonymous coward, but if you decided to write a letter to the editor of your news paper saying that and they print it, no court in the land would support a contempt charge. What if the comments made by the students were made in a letter to the editor or a private newsletter. Those can be read on campos.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
As far as blogging goes...why don't they just block access to the sites from school? Wouldn't that solve a majority of these problems?
Why don't the teachers post myspace blogs making fun of the kid's grades, problems...etc? "Awwww little Avery Doninger failed math this semester, she may have an astonishing career cooking fries at McDonalds. Congratulations Avery!"
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Senator seems pretty level headed
This is the same Senator who is in favor of loosening the State of CT drug laws, and in fact was a co-sponsor (among many) of our 2007 law decriminalizing medicinal marijuana. http://www.votesmart.org/issue_keyvote_detail.php?cs_id=13533&can_id=30210
Unfortunately it was vetoed by the Governor.
What's with all the Connecticut focused stories lately? Between Atty. General Scott Blumenthal and now this, it seems this state is in national headlines way too much for such a small state.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Not just schools.
This is just like Kentucky claiming ownership of all gambling sites, regardless of location of ownership, because they have a law and they can "see" the internet. Or other examples of countries attempting to apply their laws to sites outside of their country, because they can "see" them on the internet (which specific examples I know I'll get wrong if I try to cite them off the top of my head).
Unfortunately, it's nothing we haven't seen before, just in a much more local context.
It also shows off a bit of the Streisand Effect:
Good for Senator LeBeau.
I'd like to know what logic the courts applied, though, when they "repeatedly sided against [the family]" in suits against the school.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
More applause
Any teacher or administrator who instinctively reacts to being called "douchebag" by punishing the student probably is one. Do teachers really have such fragile egos that they need to fret some casual name-calling from a frustrated student?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Conflict of interest
It's about time someone steps up for children's rights in school. Their education should not be affected by their opinions of their teachers or school staff.
Schools shouldn't have access to the internet for kids, and if there is access it should be heavily filtered to keep them on task. I bet though that these sites are being browsed by faculty and that's where the problem is. Now, what is the faculty doing browsing a 16 year old girls personal page? Seems like a conflict of interest here on the schools part.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Conflict of interest
First of all, online communities are not just for kids.People of all ages are members of these social networks. Group posts on FACEBOOK,MySpace,etc. can be viewed by any and all who use a search tool with a person's name on it.
Individual's profiles cannot be viewed if they select privacy settings on their profile. Students can now make libelous statements online and then cry "free speech". There is a difference between venting frustration and catty comments about a teacher or professor and putting into print libelous comments that could possibly affect someone's personal life or career.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
administrators
sounds like the girl was right about the administrators.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
It seems ridiculous to me that this is even a question and not just common sense. Of course students have a right to free speech, just like all other human beings. Now I can understand the school's point of view in a case where a student is disrupting their class, but outside of the classroom, the school has no say in what a student says or does. Now, if a student starts writing libelous statements rather than obvious opinion, that would be a different situation entirely. But calling an administrator a douche bag, as that 16 year old did, is obviously not meant to be a statement of fact, and therefore is not libel. And I'll bet that blog posting got a lot more views after the school brought so much unwarranted attention to it. Just another example of schools overreacting to student behavior, what's next? Handing out dress code violations to girls wearing short skirts in their myspace pics?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
It's even more potentially dangerous than that. If a student rights a note, off school property, to a friend and that friend takes the note onto property can the writer be suspended? If I write a blog calling our president a Douche Bag dose the government have a right to retaliate? What we do to the weekest members of our socioty we will eventually do to eachother.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
A student or teacher can be sued for libel and or slander. This is the proper and legal path to resolution. A generalized derogatory reference is neither, so ignore the comment and get on with your life. Better yet contact the complainer to see if they have a legitimate complaint, its called growth by learning. The attempted revenge by school officials is not effective and makes them look really petty and vindictive. If my child was in this school system I would demand an independent investigation and public report of this incident.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
Dan is correct. A general statement that "school administrators are douche bags" is a constitutionally protected opinion. A statement that teacher John Doe or Judge Jane Doe is a douche bag is slander or libel and is legally actionable.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Ahhh the sad decline of respect for teachers and other people. A lot of students do NOT like teachers who are strict [even though it is for their own good and they only realise that later in life]. If only people were taught to respect others - I think a lot of this would not be happening. Respect for older people is also a thing of the past.
Students need to learn that teachers are there to teach them and should be participating not fighting that.
That being said - there are also a small number of teachers who should not be teachers, BUT i think that is not the norm.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
...And out come the reactionaries
"Ahhh the sad decline of respect for teachers and other people. A lot of students do NOT like teachers who are strict [even though it is for their own good and they only realise that later in life]. If only people were taught to respect others - I think a lot of this would not be happening. Respect for older people is also a thing of the past."
Of course. It was all better in the good old days when students showed proper deference to their elders, regardless of their shortcomings, and teachers never had to adapt their teaching methods to meet the students' changing needs because the job of a student, after all, is to shut up and listen.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
The schools are owned by the state.
Public School = Government
Look at it in this light removing the stuff like age and sex which are irrelevant here:
Someone calls a goverment employee a bad name on their own property, governement keeps a look out for these things in its spare time, finds out about it, punishes that person.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
So these administrators
just had to prove that they were douchebags then.
Sounds about right.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Go LeBeau!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
The LeBeau law does look great - especially in creating a "bright line" between state control and free expression. There's so much panic about students online in general that schools are quick to cry cyberbullying and clamp down on student speech. Cyberbullying is so vague, the concerns about online speech overblown (Evans' infamous blog post was read by three people), and schools are in positions of power to claim that off-campus, online speech can be treated like on-campus speech. I've written more about it here: http://ncacblog.wordpress.com/2009/02/11/when-teachers-are-criticized-principals-mocked-is-it-cyberb ullying/
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
that is not right
i think its not right from our school to get us in trodlem because what we did its non of their buiness what we do after school. they should let our parent handle it. if a kid is bothering me and i told the teacher and the teacher didn't do anything then i will hanle it my self or tell my mother.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
student free speech
student free speech means when you are allow 2 do anything outside of school hours and the school shouldn't worry on what we do outside of school its other life and students should be able to have freedom outside of school case some students don't like school and we are foced to go to school to learn and when we get out of school thats when we get to talk to other friends and more
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
omg omg oooomg
teacher should mind they buisness they odn't need to know what we do after school if i want them to know then i will tell them..............
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
STUDENT FREE SPEECH
HI MI NANE IS CERAAAAZZZY GIRLS
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
student free speech
i agree so much nd lets get2her
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
sfs
hi im memi aka eumis nd the first memi is mi twin lumis
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
sfs
hi im memi aka eumis nd the first memi is mi twin lumis
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
student free speech
i hate it when school do that. Look i am going th say that i hate avello and i am proud of it.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment