RSS
Intellectual Ventures Gets Transmeta Patents
from the patent-hoarding dept
Transmeta, of course, was the massively hyped semiconductor company that was going to revolutionize the computing world with inexpensive microprocessors. Things didn't exactly work out as planned, as the company never was able to match the hype. By 2006, the company had been reduced to suing for patent infringement, as it no longer was making any products. Basically, it was the classic story we've seen over and over again: a company fails in the market place, and then falls back on suing those who actually succeeded. Letting such companies sue seems to go against every concept of free market capitalism. It's letting the marketplace losers make a claim on the earnings of the marketplace winners.
Still, Transmeta was having some problems with its go-it-alone strategy, so now it comes as little surprise that it's sold off its patents to Nathan Myhrvold's patent hoarding monster, Intellectual Ventures, whose business model is very troubling to those of us who believe in letting companies actually innovate. Myhrvold has been squeezing tons of money out of companies to effectively immunize them from future lawsuits from the massive number of patents he's been acquiring. It's taking money out of bringing products to market, and giving it to those who have nothing to market. It's basically a multi-billion dollar example of a patent system gone wrong.
11 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- If Google Is Serious About Reforming Patent Mess, It Should Make A Bold Statement And Stop Using Motorola Patents To Demand Cash
- One Reason Why The USPTO Granted Ridiculously Stupid Internet Patents: Patent Examiners Were Banned From Using The Internet
- The Web Is Saved: East Texas Jury Says Eolas Patents Are Invalid
- Nikon Sued By Intellectual Ventures For Refusing To Pay The Shakedown Demand
- College Student/Developer Gives Up, Pays Lodsys
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Let the whining begin
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Real problem
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Is Intellectual Ventures an opt-out from the patent system?
Companies sign up with IV and hand over some of the rights to their patents, plus some cash, in exchange for defensive (only?) use of IV's extensive patent portfolio.
Not cheap, I'm sure, but this may amount to an opt-out from the patent system - pay in, contribute your patents, and you're free to innovate without worry of being sued to death. If somebody tries, you threaten to sue them back with IV's portfolio. It's Cold War style mutually assured destruction.
Of course, it wouldn't work against a pure troll with no business of their own.
But maybe this should be viewed as a modest step in the direction of clawing back the right to innovate.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Is Intellectual Ventures an opt-out from the patent system?
You mean like Intellectual Ventures ?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
umm, no one else notice the similarity
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
thieves
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
thieves
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
save our souls
it's also a call to anyone who can save us from such legally endorsed idiocy
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
But if companies are infringing someone else's patents, then they aren't innovating.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment