RSS
Twitter
Students Using Speed Cameras To Frame Other Kids
from the guilty-until-proven-innocent dept
In general, we have trouble with things like speed cameras and red light cameras -- both of which don't tend to do much of anything to make the roads safer (rather, there's evidence that they lead to more accidents). The reality is that they are really about boosting revenue for local governments, not about safety -- which explains why plenty of places have been found illegally changing parameters to make them bring in more revenue.
But the biggest problem of all is just that these cameras aren't reliable at all, and without any human witness it seems unfair to charge someone with a crime -- especially when they do things like charge a stationary brick wall with going 58mph or accuse a woman of driving a car at a stunning 480 mph. And, of course, when you have an automated system sending out violation notices, you just know it's going to get gamed. That's exactly what appears to be happening. Slashdot points out a story of students in Maryland making fake license plates matching other students' plates, slapping them on their cars and speeding by speed cameras in order to get other students slapped with fines. And, of course, others have seen similar attempts for more nefarious reasons. At what point did we decide it was okay for automated systems to issue fines without any human review?
Reader Comments
(Flattened / Threaded)
Demolition Man
Just like the swearing fines from "Demolition Man"...
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
I thought you liked technology, Mike. Wait if they are digital tickets does that mean they are an infinite good. Maybe instead of issuing tickets local PDs could sell t-shirts or ride-alongs.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
Dammit!
Looks like my rant script has malfunctioned! It's not even properly filling in the "name" field.
Plus, that's one pretty lame rant. *sigh*
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re:
We know that wasn't you, because you didn't call him, Mikey.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
"Wait if they are digital tickets does that mean they are an infinite good."
Idiot, stop making Mike's argument for him if you dislike it so much. The fact that these are automated, extremely cheap to put in place, and have nearly zero maintenance and operational costs... means the tickets they hand out should be extremely low value for basic offenses.
Its clear they are used for generating massive amounts of revenue without the overhead costs of funding adequate numbers of law enforcement officers... which could be a major problem when it gets eventually taken to extremes and we lack the law enforcement to properly protect and serve.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Electronic tickets ARE an infinite good
Electronic traffic fines are an near-infinite good: anybody who wants one can have one at low cost. Back in the old days you had to find a real cop and goad him into pulling you over; now all you have to do is drive by the camera. You might not even have to violate the law.
The problem is the government wants to give them to people who don't want one.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Electronic tickets ARE an infinite good
I guess that makes traffic cops should change their business models.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Not crimes
"But the biggest problem of all is just that these cameras aren't reliable at all, and without any human witness it seems unfair to charge someone with a crime "
Traffic violations are not generally "crimes", this gives the state alot of leeway (this is why traffic court was invented). Certainly there is no question that these cameras and most traffic enforcement is about revenue generation though, I dont even think anyone bothers to argue otherwise anymore.
Maryland was the last state I saw actually using a strategy to make roads safer. They would put cardboard cop car cutouts on the road side and everyone would slow to the speedlimit (works like magic). The police know all they have to do to get drivers to comply with the law, is be visible. They hide of course, because its about revenue generation, not safety.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Not crimes
But, but, but.., the reason they hide is to make you THINK there is a cop behind every bush and around every corner so they don't have to have a physical presence everywhere! It's not about the revenue.
Sincerely,
Local government official.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Not crimes
"Maryland was the last state I saw actually using a strategy to make roads safer. They would put cardboard cop car cutouts on the road side and everyone would slow to the speedlimit (works like magic)."
I imagine they do that in all states. I know it's been done in Pa. But it only works if people don't know about it. They can't just leave the car on the street, people figure it out.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Not crimes
"I imagine they do that in all states. I know it's been done in Pa. But it only works if people don't know about it. They can't just leave the car on the street, people figure it out."
I can promise you this is not and has never been done by the state of virginia. Traffic enforcement in Virginia at least is about revenue generation first. Once again if the goal was to slow people down, then simply having the police drive up and down the highway would work far far better, but thats not the goal, so they hide.
In a small town were my parents had a summer home, the shariff would often park his car at the main intersection of town and simply put his hat on the seat headrest. This was the best of all possible speeding deterents, becuase it worked 100% on tourists. Since locals wouldnt speed through that intersection anyway, it was a nearly perfect (and cheap) solution.
Visibility prevents speeding, hiding generates revenue. Its really just that simple.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
it was never okay
Not enough people put up a 6th amendment claim in court. This is their mistake. All you have to do is defend this part: "to be confronted with the witnesses against him"
There are no witnesses. Speed all you want, get it dismissed, hope the supreme court of each state notices.
It's all a cashgrab for the idiots not smart enough to fight it in court (fight in court + success = no fee).
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: it was never okay
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right... to be confronted with the witnesses against him;"
A speeding ticket is not a criminal prosecution. Do not expect this defense to work.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: it was never okay
It will be once you fail to show up the first time. ;)
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Matt, these things are not brought as criminal offenses (at least not in Texas) that's how they are getting away with this crap. They are brought against citizens as civil actions. Like a code violation. (high grass, trash, etc) In these cases, I don't believe you have the right to speedy trial, witnesses, etc.
I just have to live with the hope that the increased revenue is paying for officers to police high crime areas INSTEAD of laying up for traffic violations.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Without addressing red light and other cameras, I support "hiding" to catch law breakers. I think in addition to generating revenue, issuing tickets does more to dissuade speeding and make roads safer.
When the officer is parked on the corner, of course speeders slow down when they pass the patrol car. Once they are around the corner, though, it is the same unsafe behaviour. If they get two tickets in the same week, however, surprise, surprise, they drive slower and safer for a while.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
issuing tickets does more to dissuade speeding and make roads safer
Properly designed roads and driver training will make roads safer.
it is the same unsafe behaviour
You assume that the speed at which the vehicle is travelling at is unsafe. The posted speed limit does not necessarily represent the safe AND efficient speed. Many speed limits, especially in residential areas, are politically motivated not based on engineering.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Good way to go to jail
If the cops happen to see someone driving around with a fake plate over their real plate they can easily wind up in jail. The cop could see the violation, stop the car, run the plate, find out it comes to a different vehicle, and boom you're in cuffs.
And if you go to court to challenge the ticket when it't not for your car, you can show that the car/color on the photo is not your car. A reasonable judge would dismiss the charges. If you could identify the car that's faking yours, the cops would be interested.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Good way to go to jail
i love it what is the licence plate number, color make and model of you car now I can build a copy of yours that you cant dispute.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Safety considerations and $$$ for fines aside, why am I left with a feeling in my gut that Big Brother in the book "1984" has arrived and is slowly and inexorably growing in scope?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Fantastic....
The ingenuity of American teenagers makes worthless a piece of fascist technology....
I'd encourage all teenagers all over the world to do this. It would make this type of automated enforcement absurd.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Maryland was the last state I saw actually using a strategy to make roads safer. They would put cardboard cop car cutouts on the road side and everyone would slow to the speedlimit[...]
They also do this in Bulgaria.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Why would government care? As long as it's bringing in more cash - there's no other concern for them.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Texas litigation
Texas private investigator legislation is causing problems for robo-cop traffic enforcement. A Texas judge said the company running a red-light camera was acting illegally because it did not have a private investigator license. On the basis of this ruling, motorists are challenging traffic tickets. The problem started when the legislature said computer forensics experts needed to be licensed like private eyes. See deails --Ben
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Hmm...
"students in Maryland making fake license plates matching other students' plates, slapping them on their cars and speeding by speed cameras in order to get other students slapped with fines"
Does anyone else think it would be quite amusing if someone were to game the system in exactly this way, but using the license plates of the city officials who had the cameras installed?
I, for one, would LMAO if I heard a story like that on the news.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
In my town (Ventura, CA population 100,000), the city council listened to the song and dance about increased safety (revenue) from installing red light ticket cameras. The company that sold them swore the city would recoup its $3 Million+ investment within the first year due to ticket revenue. It has now been over 3 YEARS, and they have not gotten half that amount. The camera company has "generously" (and illegally) agreed to suspend the city's payments on the cameras until revenue is more in the expected range. Now they are playing with shorter yellow timing to fool people into "running" lights. Oh, and rear end collisions at intersections are up, so the body shops and chiropractors in town are seeing more business. Win-Win for all!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
"In general, we have trouble with things like speed cameras and red light cameras -- both of which don't tend to do much of anything to make the roads safer "
Where is your evidence for this counter intuitive statement?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re:
you should learn to follow the links, use google, etc... but I'm nice, so here are two sites
http://www.theagitator.com/2008/03/13/study-says-red-light-cameras-cause-death-mayhem-acne/
http://hscweb3.hsc.usf.edu/health/now/?p=404
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
I know this story isn't really meant to be funny, but LOL
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
genius...
pure genius!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
When I received my latest license plate I noticed a reflective film with something like a hologram on it. Will this protect me from the vandals described in the article?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
"When I received my latest license plate I noticed a reflective film with something like a hologram on it. Will this protect me from the vandals described in the article?"
No but it does make the plate considerably more expensive for the state to buy . . . so thats something?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Anyone who knows about traffic radar technology will tell you it is crap. The systems they use are not infallible and can be tricked with multiple cars, hell even a bird could screw up the signal. It is all about one thing, money. They don't care about anything else. If they cared about actual crimes cops would actually show when you needed them but they don't because there is no money in anything but little things like traffic violations.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Sometimes they do care.
In this case the police cares-- but someone else wants the cameras...
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
thank you...
You just gave me my defense in court for my next photo radar ticket... prove that its actually MY plate on the car and not a fake...
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: thank you...
you got it reverse. in traffic court you are guilty until proved innocent. I have a friend who was accused of going 70+ during lunch rush on the busiest, most backed up street, without his hands on the handle bars of his bike. they claimed they had video tape evidence but never showed it in court and after months of fighting the ticket (sometimes the cop wouldn't show, then the tape wasn't available so they'd delay time and time again) he still was forced to pay the fine.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
anyone have a plate number for someone at the RIAA?
hint hint
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
This worked very well, when Hawaii had its van cam working. Got someone who looked like the governor speed through the cameras with a picture of the Governors license plate Soon no more camera vans.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Santa Will Help
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T43LtGNFLPw
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment