Why Couldn't Cisco And FSF Come To An Agreement?
from the this-makes-no-sense dept
There's lots of talk in tech circles about the fact that the Free Software Foundation is now suing Cisco for copyright infringement, over Cisco's misuse of GPL'd code in its Linksys routers. What seems odd is that this got as far as it did. The issue with Linksys and its use of GPL'd code has been talked about for years, and it seems like there should have been a simple solution from the very beginning: Cisco/Linksys should have made the code available, as per the terms of the license. So why didn't they? Well, the details from the case suggest that, while Cisco did drag its feet in releasing the code, FSF then came back with additional demands, specifically:
- Cisco needed to appoint a "free software compliance officer."
- Cisco needed to try to inform all past customers of its failed compliance
- Cisco needed to pay FSF a chunk of money