RSS
Are Facebook Groups the New (and Improved) Online Petitions?
from the point-and-click-political-activism dept
There was a time when online petitions were pretty common, but they never were that effective at actually lobbying government, mainly because there's no easy way to validate signatures. The concept was ported straight from the analog world to the digital, but it's interesting to see how government lobbying has evolved online. The Ontario government recently backed down from proposed restrictions on young drivers in the face of a significant backlash, which included a Facebook group that gathered over 150,000 members. The Premier, Dalton McGuinty, mused about conducting consultations through Facebook and, though that never materialized, the group was cited as one of the major indications that the government had "stepped in it." Earlier this year, another Facebook group, Fair Copyright for Canada, had caught the attention of the national parliament in Canada.
What is it that Facebook groups have that online petitions don't? First of all, 150,000 members in a Facebook group is not the equivalent of 150,000 signatures on a (real) petition. A portion of this group's members are probably not even from Ontario (though at least Facebook provides some assurance that most members are real individual people). But, in the same way that 150,000 signatures isn't the same as 150,000 people at a rally outside the legislature, you take the context into account. It's a pretty significant number for getting a sense of a public reaction -- the government definitely hit a nerve here. A Facebook group also contains associated debate and discussion, links to other efforts (websites, YouTube videos, etc.) and a means for members to coordinate further efforts online and offline. It's more about organizing protest efforts than simply presenting a list of names.
Obviously, there are other relevant services besides Facebook (and there are lots of silly Facebook groups), but the Facebook example serves as an interesting illustration of how this sort of political activism has evolved from the digital attempt at petitions to a more involved hub of activity. In Canada, we see examples of politicians now beginning to pay attention, but to get involved -- like McGuinty suggested through consultations and like the Obama team has demonstrated through a campaign -- would take things to another level.
5 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Canadian Politician: You're Either In Favor Of Letting The Gov't Spy On Your Internet Usage... Or You're For Child Pornography
- Can Facebook Really Bring About A More Peer-to-Peer, Bottom-Up World?
- Canadian Songwriters Want To Embrace File Sharing, But Do They Have The Right Approach?
- Protest Via Plugin: Facebook Users Bring The Fight To Lamar Smith's Website
- Entertainment Industry Lobbyists Don't Want To Let Canada Into Secret TPP Negotiations Until Canada Passes More Bad Laws
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
OMFG! THEY ARE GOING TO SHUT DOWN TECHDIRT!!!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
RE: Facebook "Petitions"
Another other problem with Facebook "petitions" is that one must join the Facebook group in order to participate in discussion...so, even if one is actually opposed to the "petition", if you want to debate the issue you'll be counted as in favour of it.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: RE: Facebook "Petitions"
Very true. I've often done the join,comment,leave,read,join,comment,leave thing and it's a real pain.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Brock Lesnar
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
facebook groups
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment