Guns N' Roses Loves Online Music, On Its Own Terms

from the release-it-already dept

It will be great when Guns N' Roses' Chinese Democracy album comes out -- if only because it'll end 14 years of speculation and hype, and maybe we'll stop hearing about it for a while. It's scheduled for release on Sunday (and will be available only at a single chain of stores, thanks to an exclusive agreement), but the band is already streaming the record on its MySpace page. This comes after the band got the FBI to investigate a blogger who posted some songs from the album online a few months ago; the blogger was eventually arrested, and recently plead guilty in a plea bargain. So, like so many people in the music business, it appears that GNR love the power of online music as a promotional tool, as long as it's on their own terms. Having the guy who posted the songs prosecuted did nothing to stem the tide of illegal downloads of GNR songs, while his actions helped to promote the band and their work. Furthermore, what's the real difference between streaming the songs on MySpace, and having them freely available elsewhere online? Those who are so inclined can still find a way to convert the streams into downloaded files, while the streams could just point some users to download the album via BitTorrent, where it's readily available.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    identicon
    Annony, Nov 20th, 2008 @ 2:59pm

    I think when a person/band or company create something it should be up to them to to decide how, when & where it is released/sold/streamed. No one else even if they are creating business for the group should be allowed to distribute the music in any form or method

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous, Nov 20th, 2008 @ 3:05pm

      Re:

      Ideally, they have control over how their product is released.
      However, they don't. They know they don't. For quite some time now, bands don't have absolute control over their product's release.
      So, maybe, they could quit suing and accept and live with reality.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous, Nov 20th, 2008 @ 3:06pm

        Re: Re:

        Have had absolute control. Typing moron.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          ed stres, Apr 28th, 2009 @ 2:15am

          Re: Re: Re:

          It's not a typo, but wrong grammer,if that. I think (s)he means to say 'have', the proggessive. It's restricted by that 'ideally'. My focus goes on that word 'ideally'; who's ideal: not mine. The most irksom aspect to me though, is that (s)he seems to take for granted that their is not even a logical possability this 'ideal' might not be shaired by all.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        some old guy, Nov 20th, 2008 @ 3:29pm

        Re: Re:

        The bands (artists or mass production type) don't have any control over their creations at all. Their Label has absolute control and makes all decisions NOT in the bands best interests.

        Also, since the bands only interactions with the industry as a whole are directly through their label, the label gets to brainwash them in the way that suits the labels.

        The bands think sharing is bad because their labels told them it is. The labels think sharing is bad, because THIS CURRENT business model is the only one where the label gets to keep the vast majority of the bands revenue.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          eleete, Nov 20th, 2008 @ 3:41pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          Excellent point. Seems like no one gets their feathers ruffled when the RIAA doesn't pay the artists. God forbid the 'pirates' do the same though.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Xanthir, FCD, Nov 21st, 2008 @ 6:24am

      Re:

      I think when a person/band or company create something it should be up to them to to decide how, when & where it is released/sold/streamed. No one else even if they are creating business for the group should be allowed to distribute the music in any form or method

      Despite being radically against copyright, I agree with this (I think, at least - you may be saying something other than what I think you are).

      Several months ago, G&R did not authorize their music to be released. It was at that point solely their intellectual property, and taking it without permission is thus stealing.

      Now that they're willingly releasing it, though, it's the property of whomever downloads it. If the blogger chose to release the tracks on his site now, it would be completely ethical (as long as G&R is streaming the whole album).

      In other words, go read some Crosbie Fitch. He's got the right idea here that pulls copyright down but keeps up the rights to privacy.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Nitrodist, Nov 20th, 2008 @ 3:25pm

    The difference is that by streaming you aren't letting people download the music to their drives directly (without trickery), and therefore letting the people who sell it for money have a chance to make money as well as the actual artists.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Nov 21st, 2008 @ 5:35am

      Re:

      Why would I buy your CD when I can just listen for free on MySpace?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Nitrodist, Nov 21st, 2008 @ 8:51am

        Re: Re:

        Because you have to be online to listen to it, you can't bring the internet with you in a car (or on a bus) (excluding some kind of mobile internet package from a mobile provider), and going to myspace.com and then navigating around on the site every time you want to listen to the CD or a specific song is downright inconvenient in the long run.

        So yeah, buying a CD (or purchasing the tracks off iTunes/other service) is preferable to streaming, mostly. If the person who was questioning whether they wanted to buy the music already had the music on their HDD instead of not having it (e.g. downloaded vs. streaming), I would say that the person who doesn't actually have the music is more likely to purchase it.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Killer_Tofu (profile), Nov 21st, 2008 @ 5:59am

      Re:

      .. and therefore letting the people who sell it for money have a chance to make money as well as the actual artists.
      It has been shown time and again that the people who sell the music itself share very little revenue with the artists. Many artists have directly stated this themselves.

      Also, plenty of bands give away music for free. Radiohead tried it. Nine Inch Nails does it. There are plenty of other bands that do it. They still make a lot of money.

      And lastly, its not trickery, its just technology. A different tool.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Nov 21st, 2008 @ 6:15am

        Re: Re:

        Re: downloading streams -- I think what Nitrodist was referring to is that, in general, people still don't know how to convert streaming media to downloaded files, and that's not the "intended use." Contrast that to actual files ready to download, which everyone is familiar with and knows how to work with.

        Substitute "trickery" with "tech savvy" and I think the point works.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    eleete, Nov 20th, 2008 @ 3:25pm

    Defendant

    "what's the real difference between streaming the songs on MySpace, and having them freely available elsewhere online?"

    I believe the difference is I cannot name myself as both plaintiff and defendant, nor can I litigate against myself till I am in poverty ? Something like that sounds about right.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    bob, Nov 20th, 2008 @ 4:54pm

    I like it RAW Baby

    The new G&R is to processed like most of today's music.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    freemp3blogger, Nov 23rd, 2008 @ 6:30pm

    streaming=radio

    I think streaming is comparable to traditional offline radio. Sure, you could record it if you want to, but but most people don't becuase its an inconvenience. If you record offline radio and give away cds of the track to few hundred people, you would still potentially stir up legal problems for yourself. All that being said, thanks for the pointer about their Myspace page because I think the tracks rock.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This