RSS
Microsoft Tries A 'First One's Free' Strategy To Lure Startups
from the you-know-you-want-to-try... dept
Microsoft certainly recognizes the fact that most startups these days are automatically gravitating to a LAMP infrastructure (Linux, Apache, MySQL and PHP). So, now it seems to be trying out a new program to lure startups by offering them free software for a few years and combining it with additional services that they hope will appeal to startups. It's an interesting approach, though, in the long run, it still seems like they may have the equation backwards. While they are giving some stuff away free initially, the ultimate goal is to lock companies into paying for infinite goods like software, rather than scarcities like services.
13 Comments | Leave a Comment..
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Do The Differences Between Software Piracy And Media Piracy Matter?
- Congress Actually Helping The Internet, Rather Than Mucking It Up?
- Another Answer To Dealing With Piracy: Keep Creating Better Tools & Business Models
- Microsoft Finally Makes It Official That It Opposes SOPA.... As Written
- Demolishing The Reasoning Behind Senators Bogus Grandstanding Against Google
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
It's been said before...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's been said before...
LAMP is free....
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: It's been said before...
Its been talked about here before. The free business model works only if you have a way to charge people later. Free software is the hook to get paid for services later.
So yes, LAMP = Free now, Pay later!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: It's been said before...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
It's a trap !
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
NOT FREE!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: It's been said before...
So actually LAMP = Free now, Free later unless you're just dumb...so I'm guessing I know why you think someone has to pay for it. Idiot.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's been said before...
some old guy wrote:
Sallo wrote:
No such thing as a free lunch!!!
LAMP is free....
...nicely conflating two different meanings of "free".
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
The key word is "lock"
Key to the proprietary-software business model is the fact that, once you've become accustomed to using the vendor's product, switching away from it becomes a lot more expensive than simply continuing to pay the licence fees. It's hard to see how this might work with a LAMP-alternative, given that all the data has to be in open-standard formats (HTML, CSS etc) anyway.
Unless this is Microsoft practising "give-it-away-and-pray", or at least "give-it-away-for-now-and-hope-we-come-up-with-some-way-to-monetize-this-before-it-bleeds-us-into-th e-ground"...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: It's been said before...
I see.
So the entrepreneur who knows how to start and build a successful business, but doesn't understand the nuances of linux, is just dumb.
The executive who has his hands full running a business and doesn't have time to deal with such details is just dumb.
Got it.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: It's been said before...
> and doesn't have time to deal with such details is just
> dumb.
Yes.
That said, you don't have an "executive" running startups.
If the man at the top doesn't have a clue, then he's good
at surrounding himself with people that do. That's the only
way you can survive in that kind of environment.
A "startup" environment much less forgiving than the sort of environment that allows an "executive" to play stupid power games and build petty fiefdoms.
You certainly can't trust someone that's trying to sell
you something. That's much like putting your trust into
a used car salesman.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Why this makes sense
I know it might be hard to believe for all of you who are convinced that selling software is evil, but it is a workable business model, and you could do much worse than Microsoft for a platform stack.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment