Apple Forgets About the Moron In A Hurry Test, Threatens School With An Apple In Its Logo
from the comparing-apples-and-oranges dept
It was just a few years ago when Apple used the moron in a hurry test to defend itself against a trademark suit, but their own legal department seems to have forgotten about it already. Apple has sent a cease and desist letter to the Victoria School of Business and Technology for the use of a blue and green apple element in their logo. The Canadian school has created a comparison page on their website in an attempt to highlight the differences between the logos, hoping to dissuade Apple from launching a lawsuit by building public support. The page also contains the legal correspondence to date, including a letter in which the school's president asks if Apple is "suggesting that anyone using any variation of an apple for technology education related use is infringing on Apple's trademark."
The legal question is really about consumer confusion, as the Canadian Supreme Court has understood in the past. Trademark law doesn't grant the holder an exclusive right over every use of a mark, just the right to prevent confusing or misleading use of it. The school is a technology school, but they're also a school -- an apple is a pretty common symbol for education. It seems like "even a moron in a hurry" would recognize the difference between the two logos, especially since the acronym "VSBT" is part of the school's. The real problem here seems to be the requirement of trademark law that the holder of a mark actively polices its use. This requirement encourages these sorts of cease and desist letters, even if it seems like a comparison between apples and oranges.
21 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Shattering pyrex To Show A Massive Weakness In Trademark Law
- Hey Advertisers! Stop Believing The NFL's Lies About Trademark Law And Call The Super Bowl The Super Bowl
- Jenzabar Continues To Try To Censor Criticism Via Trademark Bullying
- DailyDirt: Ads Are Content
- Why Apple Will Not Be Part Of The Real Tablet Revolution





Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Upcoming Economy
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Attn; Apple Mouth Pieces
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
What next, suing a high school for having Jobs name?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Upcoming Economy
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
That means we don't worry what a moron (or Apple lawyer) would confuse only what the average reasonable person might think. I know what you're thinking, reasonable people don't exist in law. But, that's the precedent.
Apple's only chance is to get the school to run away from law bills.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
They should go after New York too since they are sometimes known as 'The Big Apple'
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Oh, the irony
This is fact, and Apple Computer has had to settle lawsuit after lawsuit as their company has grown.
Oh, the irony!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Apple sues NYC too
http://www.crainsnewyork.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080403/FREE/769974920/1057/newslet ter01
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Why not...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Llgunu-FlX4&feature=related
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Apples and Logos
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
It used to be, until the mid to late '80s, that matters such as these were typically handled by IP firms that were thoroughly grounded in all aspects of IP law, due in large part to the critical need to understand how all of these various IP law operate in tandem. Since then general practice firms have inserted themselves into this area of law, and in many instances have an imperfect understanding of what the body of law actually represents...and letters such as this exemplify much of the problem (not only in trademarks matters, but also in copyright and patent matters, and in particular litigation).
Hopefully cooler heads will prevail and Apple will direct the firm, if the firm has not done so already, to change its stance and work with the school to cooperatively develop a mutually acceptable solution.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Apple Forgets About the Moron In A Hurry Test
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Give Apple a taste of its own medicine.
That'll shut 'em up. /sarcasm
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Not Particularly Impressed
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
So, the Moron in a Hurry...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
http://www.schoolvictoria.com/files/0064-web-VSBT_day_2007-11-20OFS_0045.jpg
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
free PR
there is then no dilution of the trademark since its being 'licensed' probably for a minimal amount, possibly with the "value" of the agreement equalled by a corporate donation to the organisation (in the case where it will allow a tax write down).
the company (e.g. apple) doesn't make a huge song and dance, but gets a one liner at the bottom of the poster or paperwork using the logo (not on the basic signs) indicated the logo appears with the agreement of "x"
no actual need for this, but it avoids expensive legal spats and _bad_ PR.
then this can be used as an example of how open to discussions the company is when they feel the need to drop the hammer on something that "harms" the brand?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
My old primary school
http://www2.eddept.wa.edu.au/schoolprofile/display_image?schoolID=5525&type=SCH_LOGO
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment