Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1.  

   

   Chunky Vomit, Sep 24th, 2008 @ 1:35am

   
   

   I was wondering where a giant chunk of spam went all of a sudden. It will be interesting to see if it comes back in a day or two.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2.  

   

   Jake, Sep 24th, 2008 @ 3:05am

   
   

   That kind of company is exactly why I have grave doubts about the wisdom of absolving platform providers of any responsibility for keeping their own house in order at all via the CDA safe harbours.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

3.  

   It's about time.

   

   Art, Sep 24th, 2008 @ 4:52am

   
   

   I think if all internet providers took this zero-tolerance approach then our internet would be less congested. I am sure that with all of these spam messages and scams that some of our troubles from the internet are directly related to these things.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

4.  

   Close enough

   

   Todd, Sep 24th, 2008 @ 5:06am

   
   

   The other 22% just haven't been caught yet

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

5.  

   

   spammed, Sep 24th, 2008 @ 5:29am

   
   

   So that's why my spam email count dropped over the past couple of days, I was wondering why it seemed so quiet. But today I woke up to the usual 8 emails in the spam box after just 10 hours of being offline.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

6.  

   Re:

   

   Anonymous Coward, Sep 24th, 2008 @ 5:53am

   
   

   Wow, that is a neat story. Thanks, spammed.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

7.  

   Maybe the 22% were not so innocent

   

   Anonymous Coward, Sep 24th, 2008 @ 6:31am

   
   

   They didn't *find* malware on 22% of the sites. Some of these sites may not have been under development, and some might have had malware that was not detected. I am definitely guilty of assuming guilt by association, but if I understand how Intercage worked, they did not solicit regular websites. It is unfortunate if some innocents did get swept along in this, but any small business (even brick and mortar shops)has a risk of getting swept away due to outside forces.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

8.  

   

   Anonymous Coward, Sep 24th, 2008 @ 7:33am

   
   

   I sense a disturbance in the Force... It's as if a million spams cried out in terror and were silenced.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

9.  

   Re:

   

   mobiGeek, Sep 24th, 2008 @ 7:35am

   
   

   But typically the market will take care of the problems. It takes longer than if there was a gov't regulation to invoke police action (or whatever), but in the case of a platform that allows users to abuse its service, either they will resolve the abuse or they will simply lose customers to the competition.
   
   No one wants to be on a platform full of comments from drooling txt spk mor0ns.
   
   And since the internet truly is a peering system, if you allow rampant stupidity, your peers begin to ignore you.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

10.  

    Re: It's about time.

    

    mobiGeek, Sep 24th, 2008 @ 7:36am

    
    

    Which congestion are you talking about? Other than a clogged spam filter, I haven't seen any slowdowns on the 'net in quite some time...and when I do it is typically a problem with my ISP, not with "too much traffic".

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

11.  

    

    Nick, Sep 24th, 2008 @ 7:39am

    
    

    Tempts me to just block their entire AS on my network!

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

12.  

    Re:

    

    Anonymous Coward, Sep 24th, 2008 @ 7:42am

    
    

    8 spam in 10 hours? You must have another filter level between so you don't see the rest. I get that many in less than 30 seconds.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment